UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308302. eCollection 2024.
Efficient utilisation of allied health workforce may help address the predicted shortfall of 18 million health workers estimated by 2030. Knowledge about allied health professionals' attrition, or intention to leave, and factors influencing attrition can assist in developing evidence-informed strategies to mitigate this issue. The review aimed to map attrition and attrition intention rates, and its attributing factors for allied health professions worldwide.
Adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across academic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database) and grey literature (Google, Google Scholar, organisational websites). Two reviewers independently undertook a two-stage screening process along with data extraction using customised data extraction forms. A narrative synthesis was used to synthesise the data.
Thirty-two studies published between 1990 and 2024 were included. Attrition rates ranged from 0.5% to 41% across allied health disciplines. Pharmacists demonstrated the lowest attrition rates, while audiologists reported the highest. Radiographers reported the lowest intent to leave at 7.6%, while occupational therapists showed highest intent to leave, ranging from 10.7% to 74.1%. The analysis revealed three recurring themes contributing to attrition: profession-centric factors (e.g., career progression, job satisfaction, support, and professional growth), systemic-centric factors (e.g., compensation, staffing challenges, clinical practices, patient care, workload), and individual-centric factors (e.g., recognition, the need for change, and burnout).
Attrition in allied health remains a significant challenge. Addressing this issue requires a systemic, nuanced, and evidence-based approach, given the complex, interlinked, and multifaceted factors contributing to attrition. The younger workforce, characterized by changing generational values, necessitates innovative thinking, intersectoral collaboration, and the potential for co-created solutions with, for, and by the allied health workforce.
有效利用辅助医疗人员可能有助于解决到 2030 年预计将出现 1800 万卫生工作者短缺的问题。了解辅助卫生专业人员的离职率或离职意向以及影响离职的因素,可以帮助制定基于证据的策略来缓解这一问题。本综述旨在绘制全球辅助卫生职业的离职率和离职意向率及其归因因素。
根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南,我们在学术数据库(PsycINFO、MEDLINE、Embase、Emcare、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库)和灰色文献(Google、Google Scholar、组织网站)中进行了全面检索。两名审查员独立进行了两阶段筛选过程,并使用定制的数据提取表提取数据。采用叙述性综合方法对数据进行综合。
共纳入 1990 年至 2024 年期间发表的 32 项研究。不同辅助医疗学科的离职率范围为 0.5%至 41%。药剂师的离职率最低,而听力学家的离职率最高。放射技师的离职意向率最低,为 7.6%,而职业治疗师的离职意向率最高,范围为 10.7%至 74.1%。分析显示,有三个反复出现的主题导致离职:以职业为中心的因素(如职业发展、工作满意度、支持和专业成长)、以系统为中心的因素(如薪酬、人员配备挑战、临床实践、患者护理、工作量)和以个人为中心的因素(如认可、变革的需要和倦怠)。
辅助医疗人员的离职仍然是一个重大挑战。由于导致离职的因素复杂、相互关联且多方面,因此需要采取系统的、细致入微的、基于证据的方法来解决这个问题。以年轻劳动力为特征的代际价值观不断变化,需要创新思维、跨部门合作以及与辅助医疗人员共同创造解决方案的潜力。