• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多的线上互动,更多的股票流动性:--来自中国股票交易所线上互动平台的证据。

More online interaction, more stock liquidity:--Evidence from Chinese stock exchange online interaction platform.

机构信息

School of Economics, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

The Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-rural Integrated Development, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308160. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308160
PMID:39240876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379302/
Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of online interaction between investors and enterprises on stock liquidity, using data from A-share listed companies in China from 2010 to 2021. Firstly, our findings reveal that more frequent interaction leads to better stock liquidity, and this result remains consistent across various robustness tests. Secondly, we observe that the expected tenure of senior executives and the ratio of institutional investor ownership exert a significant moderating effect on this relationship. Thirdly, this effect varies across enterprises at different development stages and with different ownership structures, being more pronounced in growing and privately-owned companies. Furthermore, this paper finds an inverted U-shaped relationship between reply length and stock liquidity, indicating that excessively long replies may introduce noise and negatively affect liquidity. This study provides new insights into how online interactions can improve market efficiency and offers practical implications for corporate governance and investor relations.

摘要

本文利用 2010 年至 2021 年中国 A 股上市公司的数据,研究了投资者与企业之间的在线互动对股票流动性的影响。首先,我们发现更频繁的互动会导致更好的股票流动性,这一结果在各种稳健性检验中仍然一致。其次,我们观察到高管的预期任期和机构投资者持股比例对这种关系有显著的调节作用。第三,这种效应在不同发展阶段和不同所有制结构的企业之间存在差异,在成长型和私营企业中更为明显。此外,本文还发现回复长度与股票流动性之间呈倒 U 型关系,表明过长的回复可能会引入噪音并对流动性产生负面影响。本研究为在线互动如何提高市场效率提供了新的见解,并为公司治理和投资者关系提供了实际启示。

相似文献

1
More online interaction, more stock liquidity:--Evidence from Chinese stock exchange online interaction platform.更多的线上互动,更多的股票流动性:--来自中国股票交易所线上互动平台的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308160. eCollection 2024.
2
Enterprise digital transformation's impact on stock liquidity: A corporate governance perspective.企业数字化转型对股票流动性的影响:公司治理视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0293818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293818. eCollection 2024.
3
Forward looking statement, investor sentiment and stock liquidity.前瞻性陈述、投资者情绪与股票流动性。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 11;9(4):e15329. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15329. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Does institutional quality moderate the relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity? Evidence from the emerging market of Pakistan.制度质量是否会调节公司治理与股票流动性之间的关系?来自巴基斯坦新兴市场的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:912796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912796. eCollection 2022.
5
Does financial transparency substitute corporate governance to improve stock liquidity? Evidence from emerging market of Pakistan.财务透明度是否能替代公司治理来提高股票流动性?来自巴基斯坦新兴市场的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 14;13:1003081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003081. eCollection 2022.
6
Air pollution, investor sentiment and stock liquidity.空气污染、投资者情绪与股票流动性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;10:989457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.989457. eCollection 2022.
7
Can Enterprises in China Achieve Sustainable Development through Green Investment?中国企业能否通过绿色投资实现可持续发展?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031787.
8
Institutional investors and cost of capital: The moderating effect of ownership structure.机构投资者与资本成本:股权结构的调节效应。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249963. eCollection 2021.
9
How do Institutional Investors Influence Corporate Governance under Legal Psychology.机构投资者如何在法律心理学下影响公司治理
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;2022:5004309. doi: 10.1155/2022/5004309. eCollection 2022.
10
Can the Market Recognize the Value of the Corporate Governance Mechanism of Chinese Listed Companies?-Empirical Evidence From COVID-19.市场能否认可中国上市公司治理机制的价值?——来自新冠疫情的经验证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;9:812253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.812253. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploration or exploitation? A study on equity incentive design, dynamic decision making, and economic consequences.探索还是开发?股权激励设计、动态决策与经济后果研究
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0277965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277965. eCollection 2023.
2
Will executive equity incentives affect investor relations management: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies.高管股权激励会影响投资者关系管理吗:来自中国上市公司的实证证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 19;13:968677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968677. eCollection 2022.
3
Dynamic Analyses of Contagion Risk and Module Evolution on the SSE A-Shares Market Based on Minimum Information Entropy.基于最小信息熵的上证A股市场传染风险与模块演化动态分析
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;23(4):434. doi: 10.3390/e23040434.