Suppr超能文献

日本老年人多个虚弱领域的流行程度及其对预后的影响。

Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Multiple Frailty Domain in Japanese Older Adults.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Nov;25(11):105238. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105238. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the independent and overlapping effects of multiple frailty domains on long-term care insurance (LTCI) use.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort design.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In total, 9804 community-dwelling older adults were recruited from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Study of Geriatric Syndromes.

METHODS

The physical domain of frailty was assessed using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. The cognitive domain of frailty was identified as impairment of memory, attention, executive function, or processing speed using standardized thresholds established for each domain in population-based cohorts. The social domain was operationalized using the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Social Frailty Scale. The use of LTCI was prospectively determined over 60 months using data extracted from the Japanese long-term care insurance system.

RESULTS

The data from 7745 participants were analyzed, of whom 793 (10.2%) required LTCI certification within 60 months (interquartile range: 60-60 months). The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated that a high number of frailty domains was associated with incident LTCI use. The proportions of incident LTCI use were 6.0%, 12.4%, 30.1%, and 43.9% for non-frail participants and those with impairments in 1, 2, and 3 frailty domains, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression model, physical, cognitive, and social domain impairments independently increased the risk of incident LTCI use [physical domain impairment, hazard ratio (HR), 1.67; 95% CI, 1.39-2.01; cognitive domain impairment, HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.84; social domain impairment, HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.50].

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Overlapping frailty domains were strongly associated with incident LTCI use among community-dwelling older adults. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing multiple frailty domains and tailoring interventions according to the unique circumstances of older adults to prevent functional disabilities.

摘要

目的

在这项观察性研究中,我们旨在评估多种虚弱领域对长期护理保险(LTCI)使用的独立和重叠影响。

设计

基于人群的队列设计。

地点和参与者

共招募了 9804 名居住在社区的老年人,他们来自日本全国老年医学和老年学中心-老年综合征研究。

方法

使用修订后的心血管健康研究标准的日本版评估身体虚弱领域。使用基于人群队列中为每个领域设定的标准化阈值,将认知虚弱领域确定为记忆、注意力、执行功能或处理速度受损。社会领域通过国家老年医学和老年学中心-社会虚弱量表来运作。使用从日本长期护理保险系统中提取的数据,前瞻性地确定 LTCI 在 60 个月内的使用情况。

结果

对 7745 名参与者的数据进行了分析,其中 793 名(10.2%)在 60 个月内需要 LTCI 认证(四分位距:60-60 个月)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析表明,虚弱领域的数量与 LTCI 使用的发生有关。非虚弱参与者和在 1、2 和 3 个虚弱领域中存在障碍的参与者发生 LTCI 使用的比例分别为 6.0%、12.4%、30.1%和 43.9%。在多变量 Cox 回归模型中,身体、认知和社会领域的障碍独立增加了 LTCI 使用的风险[身体障碍,风险比(HR),1.67;95%置信区间(CI),1.39-2.01;认知障碍,HR,1.59;95%CI,1.37-1.84;社会障碍,HR,1.26;95%CI,1.05-1.50]。

结论和意义

重叠的虚弱领域与社区居住的老年人 LTCI 使用的发生密切相关。这些发现强调了评估多种虚弱领域的重要性,并根据老年人的独特情况制定干预措施,以防止功能障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验