van Loon Austin, Goldberg Amir, Srivastava Sameer B
Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 6;2(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00087-4.
Dehumanization of others has been attributed to institutional processes that spread dehumanizing norms and narratives, as well as to individuals' denial of mind to others. We propose that blatant dehumanization also arises when people actively contemplate others' minds. We introduce the construct of imagined otherness-perceiving that a prototypical member of a social group construes an important facet of the social world in ways that diverge from the way most humans understand it-and argue that such attributions catalyze blatant dehumanization beyond the effects of general perceived difference and group identification. Measuring perceived schematic difference relative to the concept of America, we examine how this measure relates to the tendency of U.S. Republicans and Democrats to blatantly dehumanize members of the other political party. We report the results of two pre-registered studies-one correlational (N = 771) and one experimental (N = 398)-that together lend support for our theory. We discuss implications of these findings for research on social boundaries, political polarization, and the measurement of meaning.
对他人的非人化归因于传播非人化规范和叙事的制度过程,以及个人对他人心智的否认。我们提出,当人们积极思考他人的心智时,公然的非人化也会出现。我们引入了想象的他异性这一概念——即感知到一个社会群体的典型成员以不同于大多数人理解的方式来理解社会世界的一个重要方面——并认为这种归因会引发公然的非人化,其影响超出了一般感知差异和群体认同的作用。通过测量相对于美国概念的感知图式差异,我们研究了这一指标与美国共和党人和民主党人公然将对方政党成员非人化的倾向之间的关系。我们报告了两项预先注册研究的结果——一项相关性研究(N = 771)和一项实验性研究(N = 398)——它们共同为我们的理论提供了支持。我们讨论了这些发现对社会边界、政治极化和意义测量研究的启示。