• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极情绪通过调节奖励预测误差的影响来调节记忆。

Positive affect modulates memory by regulating the influence of reward prediction errors.

作者信息

Qasim Salman E, Deswal Aarushi, Saez Ignacio, Gu Xiaosi

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Commun Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;2(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00106-4.

DOI:10.1038/s44271-024-00106-4
PMID:39242805
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11332028/
Abstract

How our decisions impact our memories is not well understood. Reward prediction errors (RPEs), the difference between expected and obtained reward, help us learn to make optimal decisions-providing a signal that may influence subsequent memory. To measure this influence and how it might go awry in mood disorders, we recruited a large cohort of human participants to perform a decision-making task in which perceptually memorable stimuli were associated with probabilistic rewards, followed by a recognition test for those stimuli. Computational modeling revealed that positive RPEs enhanced both the accuracy of memory and the temporal efficiency of memory search, beyond the contribution of perceptual information. Critically, positive affect upregulated the beneficial effect of RPEs on memory. These findings demonstrate how affect selectively regulates the impact of RPEs on memory, providing a computational mechanism for biased memory in mood disorders.

摘要

我们的决策如何影响记忆,目前还不太清楚。奖励预测误差(RPEs),即预期奖励与实际获得奖励之间的差异,帮助我们学会做出最优决策——提供一个可能影响后续记忆的信号。为了衡量这种影响以及它在情绪障碍中可能出现的偏差,我们招募了一大群人类参与者来执行一项决策任务,在该任务中,在感知上令人难忘的刺激与概率奖励相关联,随后对这些刺激进行识别测试。计算模型表明,积极的奖励预测误差提高了记忆的准确性和记忆搜索的时间效率,超出了感知信息的作用。至关重要的是,积极情绪上调了奖励预测误差对记忆的有益影响。这些发现表明情绪如何选择性地调节奖励预测误差对记忆的影响,为情绪障碍中的记忆偏差提供了一种计算机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/650768c38d58/44271_2024_106_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/cc642b4e0114/44271_2024_106_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/ae5a2267de0c/44271_2024_106_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/4bc01a3facf8/44271_2024_106_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/a05f0f57ddc7/44271_2024_106_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/650768c38d58/44271_2024_106_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/cc642b4e0114/44271_2024_106_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/ae5a2267de0c/44271_2024_106_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/4bc01a3facf8/44271_2024_106_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/a05f0f57ddc7/44271_2024_106_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e83/11332028/650768c38d58/44271_2024_106_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Positive affect modulates memory by regulating the influence of reward prediction errors.积极情绪通过调节奖励预测误差的影响来调节记忆。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;2(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00106-4.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Reward motivation influences response bias on a recognition memory task.奖励动机影响识别记忆任务中的反应偏差。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104337. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104337. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
6
Dopamine Modulates Dynamic Decision-Making during Foraging.多巴胺调节觅食过程中的动态决策。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;40(27):5273-5282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2586-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Genetic determinants of testicular sperm extraction outcomes: insights from a large multicentre study of men with non-obstructive azoospermia.睾丸精子提取结果的遗传决定因素:来自一项针对非梗阻性无精子症男性的大型多中心研究的见解
Hum Reprod Open. 2025 Aug 29;2025(3):hoaf049. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf049. eCollection 2025.
8
Q-learning with temporal memory to navigate turbulence.基于时间记忆的Q学习以应对动荡。
Elife. 2025 Jul 21;13:RP102906. doi: 10.7554/eLife.102906.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple routes to enhanced memory for emotionally relevant events.多种途径增强与情绪相关事件的记忆。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep;27(9):867-882. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
2
Trait anxiety is associated with hidden state inference during aversive reversal learning.特质焦虑与厌恶反转学习过程中的隐藏状态推断有关。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 14;14(1):4203. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39825-3.
3
The features underlying the memorability of objects.物体记忆能力的特征。
Sci Adv. 2023 Apr 28;9(17):eadd2981. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add2981. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Item memorability has no influence on value-based decisions.项目的可记忆性对基于价值的决策没有影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26333-5.
5
Predicting visual memory across images and within individuals.跨图像及个体内部预测视觉记忆。
Cognition. 2022 Oct;227:105201. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105201. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Disrupted computations of social control in individuals with obsessive-compulsive and misophonia symptoms.患有强迫症和恐音症症状的个体中社会控制计算的紊乱。
iScience. 2022 Jun 16;25(7):104617. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104617. eCollection 2022 Jul 15.
7
Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.强化学习和贝叶斯推断为青少年在随机反转中的独特优势提供了互补的模型。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jun;55:101106. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101106. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Valence biases in reinforcement learning shift across adolescence and modulate subsequent memory.强化学习中的效价偏差在青春期发生转变,并调节随后的记忆。
Elife. 2022 Jan 24;11:e64620. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64620.
9
The Reward System and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Does Trauma Affect the Way We Interact With Positive Stimuli?奖励系统与创伤后应激障碍:创伤会影响我们与积极刺激的互动方式吗?
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2021 Feb 25;5:2470547021996006. doi: 10.1177/2470547021996006. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
Signed and unsigned reward prediction errors dynamically enhance learning and memory.签名和未签名的奖励预测误差动态增强学习和记忆。
Elife. 2021 Mar 4;10:e61077. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61077.