Suppr超能文献

家庭顾问参与研究以改善痴呆症患者姑息治疗方法的动机:一项解释性描述性研究

Motivations of family advisors in engaging in research to improve a palliative approach to care for persons living with dementia: an interpretive descriptive study.

作者信息

Lucchese Stephanie, Yous Marie-Lee, Kruizinga Julia, Vellani Shirin, Rivas Vanessa Maradiaga, Tétrault Bianca, Holliday Pam, Geoghegan Carmel, Just Danielle, Sussman Tamara, Ganann Rebecca, Kaasalainen Sharon

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 3Z1, Canada.

Lawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 6;10(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00623-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A Strategic Guiding Council (SGC) was created within a Family Carer Decisions Support study, to engage family carers of persons with advanced dementia as advisors to inform the design and implementation of the study. The SGC consists of an international group of family advisors from Canada, the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. There are limited studies that have explored the integration of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in dementia research, end-of-life care and long-term care. Therefore, this study explores PPI engagement in health research with family carers to understand further their interest in being involved in the SCG within the FCDS intervention which is focused on supporting caregivers to make decisions about end-of-life care for residents with advanced dementia.

METHODS

This study utilized an interpretive descriptive design and explored the motivations of ten family advisors from Canada, the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands in being part of the SGC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by phone or videoconferencing and were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes generated from the findings of the study were (1) engaging in reciprocal learning; (2) using lived experience to support other family carers; and (3) creating a collective momentum for advocacy and change.

CONCLUSIONS

Family carers motivations to being part of the SCG was driven by their intent to help carers navigate the health system and to create a psychosocial support system for other carers experiencing end-of-life with their loved ones. Being part of the SCG provided a benefit to family carers which provided a venue for them to contribute meaningful information from their experience, learn from other health professionals, research and other advisors and an avenue for advocacy work to improve access to end-of-life care supports through education. To our knowledge, this is the first study that explores the motivations of an international group of family advisors' engagement in health research to promote integration of a palliative approach to dementia care in long-term care homes. This study further contributes to the literature from an international perspective the importance of PPI in research. Further research is warranted that explores PPI in research to improve access to end-of-life supports.

摘要

背景

在一项家庭照顾者决策支持研究中设立了战略指导委员会(SGC),让晚期痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者作为顾问参与其中,为研究的设计和实施提供信息。SGC由来自加拿大、爱尔兰共和国、英国、荷兰和捷克共和国的国际家庭顾问小组组成。探索患者和公众参与(PPI)在痴呆症研究、临终关怀和长期护理中的整合的研究有限。因此,本研究探讨了家庭照顾者在健康研究中的PPI参与情况,以进一步了解他们参与FCDS干预中SGC的兴趣,该干预旨在支持照顾者就晚期痴呆症患者的临终护理做出决策。

方法

本研究采用解释性描述设计,探讨了来自加拿大、爱尔兰共和国、英国和荷兰的十位家庭顾问参与SGC的动机。通过电话或视频会议进行半结构化访谈,并进行录音、转录和使用主题分析进行分析。

结果

该研究结果产生了三个主题:(1)参与相互学习;(2)利用生活经验支持其他家庭照顾者;(3)为宣传和变革创造集体动力。

结论

家庭照顾者参与SGC的动机是他们希望帮助照顾者应对医疗系统,并为其他与亲人经历临终阶段的照顾者创建一个心理社会支持系统。成为SGC的一员为家庭照顾者带来了好处,为他们提供了一个场所,让他们能够分享有意义的经验信息,向其他健康专业人员、研究人员和其他顾问学习,并通过教育开展宣传工作,以改善临终护理支持的可及性。据我们所知,这是第一项探索国际家庭顾问小组参与健康研究以促进在长期护理机构中整合姑息治疗方法用于痴呆症护理的动机的研究。本研究从国际视角进一步为PPI在研究中的重要性文献做出了贡献。有必要进行进一步的研究,探索研究中的PPI以改善临终支持的可及性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Palliative Approach to Care Education for Multidisciplinary Staff of Long-Term Care Homes: A Pretest Post-Test Study.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2023 Feb 22;9:23337214231158470. doi: 10.1177/23337214231158470. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Challenges of Research on Person-Centered Care in General Practice: A Scoping Review.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;8:669491. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.669491. eCollection 2021.
9
Developing a Canadian evaluation framework for patient and public engagement in research: study protocol.
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Feb 25;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00255-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验