Jain Akriti G, Volpe Virginia O, Wang Chen, Ball Somedeb, Tobon Katherine, Chan Onyee, Padron Eric, Kuykendall Andrew, Lancet Jeffrey E, Komrokji Rami, Sallman David A, Sweet Kendra L
Leukemia and Myeloid Disorders , Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Malignant Hematology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann Hematol. 2025 Jan;104(1):307-315. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05976-6. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with AML treated with frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax (HMA + Ven) who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) as defined by ELN 2022.
Patients with AML seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2018 and 2022 and treated with HMA + Ven were retrospectively evaluated.
About 120 patients achieved blast clearance with best response of CR in 52 (43.3%), CRh in 22 (18.3%), CRi in 31 (25.8%) and MLFS in 15 (12.5%) patients. Greater proportion of patients with MLFS had a prior myeloid malignancy (p = 0.003) and were treated with prior HMA (p < 0.001). Patients that achieved MLFS as their best response had inferior OS compared to the CR/CRh/CRi cohort (8 months vs. 27 months; p < 0.001). RFS was also worse for the MLFS cohort.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing differences in outcomes of AML patients treated with HMA + Ven based on best response. We noted that prior myeloid malignancy and use of HMA led to more MLFS as best response compared to CR/CRi. The OS and RFS were inferior for MLFS cohort.
我们旨在比较接受一线低甲基化药物和维奈克拉(HMA+Ven)治疗且达到完全缓解(CR)、部分血液学恢复的完全缓解(CRh)、血液学恢复不完全的完全缓解(CRi)或根据2022年欧洲白血病网络(ELN)定义的形态学无白血病状态(MLFS)的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的预后。
对2018年至2022年在莫菲特癌症中心就诊并接受HMA+Ven治疗的AML患者进行回顾性评估。
约120例患者达到原始细胞清除,最佳反应为CR的有52例(43.3%),CRh的有22例(18.3%),CRi的有31例(25.8%),MLFS的有15例(12.5%)。MLFS患者中既往有髓系恶性肿瘤的比例更高(p=0.003),且曾接受过HMA治疗(p<0.001)。与CR/CRh/CRi队列相比,以MLFS作为最佳反应的患者总生存期较差(8个月对27个月;p<0.001)。MLFS队列的无复发生存期也更差。
据我们所知,这是分析基于最佳反应接受HMA+Ven治疗的AML患者预后差异的最大规模研究。我们注意到,与CR/CRi相比,既往髓系恶性肿瘤和HMA的使用导致更多患者以MLFS作为最佳反应。MLFS队列的总生存期和无复发生存期较差。