• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命周期评估方法对哥伦比亚大规模牛肉生产的环境影响:案例研究。

Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study.

机构信息

Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Medellín, 050041, Medellín, Colombia.

Grupo de Investigación BIORUM, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Medellín, 050041, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Sep;31(43):55720-55735. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34463-8. Epub 2024 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-34463-8
PMID:39243329
Abstract

The increase in the negative effects of global change promotes the search for alternatives to supply the demand for food worldwide aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to ensure food security. Animal protein, which is a main source of nutrients in the diet of today's society, especially beef, which is one of the most demanded products nowadays, has been criticized not only for its high water consumption and land occupation for production but also for the emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) from enteric methane generated in the fermentation process within the bovine rumen and deforestation for the adaptation of pastures. This study is mainly motivated by the lack of quantifiable scientific information in Colombia on the environmental impacts of beef production. Therefore, it is intended to estimate some of the impacts of beef production in extensive systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method under a particular scenario considering all the production phases (from raw material to fattening, where the cattle are ready to be slaughtered). The study was conducted with data supplied by a farm in Antioquia, Colombia, and the functional unit (FU) was defined as 1 kg of live weight (LW). The scope of this study was gate-to-gate. "The 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories" (IPCC  2006; IPCC 2019) was used to calculate methane and nitrous oxide emissions. LCA modeling was developed with Ecoinvent database v3.8 and the Umberto LCA + software. It was found that the most affected category of damage was ecosystem quality, which represents 77% of the total, followed by human health at 17% and resources at 6%. The category impact of agricultural land occupation is the one that represents the most significant contribution to the ecosystem quality endpoint, with a percentage of 87%, due to the soil's compaction and the loss of the soil's properties. Additionally, the obtained carbon footprint for the system was 28.9 kg of CO-eq/kg LW.

摘要

全球变化负面影响的增加促使人们寻找替代方案,以满足全球对食品的需求,同时符合可持续发展目标(SDGs),以确保粮食安全。动物蛋白是当今社会饮食中的主要营养来源,尤其是牛肉,它是当今需求量最大的产品之一,不仅因其生产过程中高耗水和占用大量土地而受到批评,还因其在牛瘤胃发酵过程中产生的温室气体(GHG)排放和为适应牧场而砍伐森林而受到批评。本研究主要是由于缺乏关于哥伦比亚牛肉生产环境影响的可量化科学信息。因此,本研究旨在使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法,根据特定情景考虑所有生产阶段(从原材料到育肥,即牛准备屠宰的阶段)来估计一些大规模系统中牛肉生产的影响。该研究使用来自哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚的一个农场提供的数据进行,并将功能单位(FU)定义为 1 公斤活重(LW)。本研究的范围是从源头到终端。“2006 年气专委国家温室气体清单指南的 2019 年修订版”(IPCC 2006;IPCC 2019)用于计算甲烷和氧化亚氮排放。LCA 模型使用 Ecoinvent 数据库 v3.8 和 Umberto LCA + 软件进行开发。结果发现,受影响最严重的损害类别是生态系统质量,占总数的 77%,其次是人类健康占 17%,资源占 6%。农业土地占用的类别影响是对生态系统质量终点贡献最大的类别,占 87%,这是由于土壤压实和土壤特性丧失所致。此外,该系统获得的碳足迹为 28.9 公斤 CO2-eq/kg LW。

相似文献

1
Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study.生命周期评估方法对哥伦比亚大规模牛肉生产的环境影响:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Sep;31(43):55720-55735. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34463-8. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
2
Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment.哥伦比亚初级牛肉生产链的环境影响:使用生命周期评估法的碳足迹、不可再生能源和土地利用。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145573. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145573. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.生命牛肉碳:一种用于量化草饲和谷饲牛肉农场碳足迹的通用框架。
Animal. 2020 Apr;14(4):834-845. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002519. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.加利恩欣赏俱乐部评论:从整体角度看待牛肉生产的社会相关性及其对气候变化的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad024.
5
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Breeding Based on the Ecological Cycle Model.基于生态循环模型的肉牛养殖温室气体排放。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;19(15):9481. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159481.
6
Estimation of carbon footprint and sources of emissions of an extensive alpaca production system.估算一个大型羊驼养殖系统的碳足迹和排放源。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Sep 29;54(5):331. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03271-y.
7
Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.开发城市固体废物运输的碳足迹模型和环境影响分析:以伊朗德黑兰为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Dec;73(12):890-901. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2271424. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
8
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
9
Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.加利福尼亚州牛肉生产系统的碳足迹和氨排放。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4641-55. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4653. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.农民能否通过粮食、燃料和饲料的综合生产来减轻环境影响?具有绿色生物精炼厂的综合混合作物-牲畜系统的 consequential 生命周期评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 1;619-620:127-143. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.082. Epub 2017 Nov 13.