Suppr超能文献

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的日间过度嗜睡:原发性 OSA 治疗依从/不依从患者中促醒药物的间接治疗比较。

Excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea: Indirect treatment comparison of wake-promoting agents in patients adherent/nonadherent to primary OSA therapy.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.

Ignis Therapeutics (Shanghai) Limited, Shanghai, 200000, China.

出版信息

Sleep Med Rev. 2024 Dec;78:101997. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101997. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

Abstract

There remains an unmet need for a targeted treatment to address residual excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after primary treatment. This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of wake-promoting agents (WPAs), namely solriamfetol, pitolisant, modafinil, and armodafinil, for treating residual EDS in patients with OSA. We conducted a comprehensive search which ultimately included 18 studies in the final analysis. All 4 WPAs demonstrated significant therapeutic benefits for the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score, solriamfetol, pitolisant, modafinil and armodafinil were ranked from highest to lowest for the ESS. A similar ranking was observed for MWT, where pitolisant was not included in the analysis. The subgroup analysis also evaluated the efficacy of WPAs in the primary treatment adherent and nonadherent subgroups. Regarding adverse reactions, solriamfetol demonstrated the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation, whereas pitolisant exhibited minimal risks of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and treatment-emergent adverse events. Our analysis comprehensively compared the effects and adverse reactions of different WPAs in treating residual EDS in treated patients with OSA. This has significant implications for the practical clinical use of WPAs and future research.

摘要

对于接受过原发性治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者,仍然存在针对残余日间过度嗜睡(EDS)的靶向治疗需求。本网络荟萃分析评估了觉醒促进剂(WPA),即索里昂啡特、匹莫林、莫达非尼和阿莫达非尼,治疗 OSA 患者残余 EDS 的疗效和安全性。我们进行了全面的搜索,最终包括 18 项研究进行了最终分析。所有 4 种 WPA 均对 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)和维持觉醒测试(MWT)显示出显著的治疗益处。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)评分,索里昂啡特、匹莫林、莫达非尼和阿莫达非尼在 ESS 方面的排名从高到低。在 MWT 中也观察到了类似的排名,其中匹莫林未包含在分析中。亚组分析还评估了 WPA 在原发性治疗依从和不依从亚组中的疗效。关于不良反应,索里昂啡特显示出所有原因停药的风险最低,而匹莫林显示出导致停药的不良事件和治疗后出现的不良事件的风险最小。我们的分析全面比较了不同 WPA 治疗接受过治疗的 OSA 患者残余 EDS 的效果和不良反应。这对 WPA 的实际临床应用和未来研究具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验