Pitre Tyler, Mah Jasmine, Roberts Sarah, Desai Kairavi, Gu Yusing, Ryan Clodagh, Busse Jason W, Zeraatkar Dena
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (T.P.).
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (J.M., Y.G.).
Ann Intern Med. 2023 May;176(5):676-684. doi: 10.7326/M22-3473. Epub 2023 May 9.
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is common among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic agents is unknown.
To compare the effectiveness of drugs for EDS in OSA using network meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 7 November 2022.
Reviewers identified randomized trials that enrolled patients with EDS-associated OSA on or eligible for conventional therapy assigned to any pharmacologic intervention.
Paired reviewers independently extracted data addressing effects of drugs on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), and adverse events at the longest reported follow-up. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
Fourteen trials (3085 patients) were eligible. At 4 weeks, compared with placebo, solriamfetol improves ESS scores (mean difference [MD], -3.85 [95% CI, -5.24 to -2.50]; high certainty), and armodafinil-modafinil (MD, -2.25 [CI, -2.85 to -1.64]; moderate certainty) and pitolisant-H3-autoreceptor blockers (MD, -2.78 [CI, -4.03 to -1.51]; moderate certainty) probably improve ESS scores. At 4 weeks, compared with placebo, solriamfetol (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.9 [CI, 0.64 to 1.17]) and armodafinil-modafinil (SMD, 0.41 [CI, 0.27 to 0.55]) improve MWT (both high certainty), whereas pitolisant-H3-autoreceptor blockers probably do not (moderate certainty). At 4 weeks, armodafinil-modafinil probably increases the risk for discontinuation due to adverse events (relative risk [RR], 2.01 [CI, 1.14 to 3.51]; moderate certainty); solriamfetol may increase the risk for discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 2.07 [CI, 0.67 to 6.25]; low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggests these interventions may not increase the risk for serious adverse events.
There is limited evidence on long term or effectiveness among patients nonadherent or with mixed adherence to conventional OSA therapies.
Solriamfetol, armodafinil-modafinil, and pitolisant reduce daytime sleepiness for patients with OSA already on conventional therapy, with solriamfetol likely superior. Adverse events probably increase the risk for discontinuation of armodafinil-modafinil and may increase the risk for discontinuation with solriamfetol.
None.
日间过度嗜睡(EDS)在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者中很常见。药物治疗的相对疗效尚不清楚。
使用网状Meta分析比较治疗OSA患者EDS的药物疗效。
截至2022年11月7日的MEDLINE、CENTRAL、EMBASE和ClinicalTrials.gov。
reviewers确定了随机试验,这些试验纳入了患有EDS相关OSA且正在接受或符合常规治疗条件并被分配接受任何药物干预的患者。
配对的reviewers独立提取数据,以探讨药物对Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)、清醒维持试验(MWT)的影响以及在最长报告随访期的不良事件。使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定和评价)方法评估证据的确定性。
14项试验(3085例患者)符合条件。在4周时,与安慰剂相比,索利那新可改善ESS评分(平均差值[MD],-3.85[95%CI,-5.24至-2.50];高确定性),阿得拉-莫达非尼(MD,-2.25[CI,-2.85至-1.64];中度确定性)和匹托利生-H3-自受体阻滞剂(MD,-2.78[CI,-4.03至-1.51];中度确定性)可能改善ESS评分。在4周时,与安慰剂相比,索利那新(标准化平均差值[SMD],0.9[CI,0.64至1.17])和阿得拉-莫达非尼(SMD,0.41[CI,0.27至0.55])可改善MWT(两者均为高确定性),而匹托利生-H3-自受体阻滞剂可能无此作用(中度确定性)。在4周时,阿得拉-莫达非尼可能增加因不良事件停药的风险(相对风险[RR],2.01[CI,1.14至3.51];中度确定性);索利那新可能增加因不良事件停药的风险(RR,2.07[CI,0.67至6.25];低确定性)。低确定性证据表明,这些干预措施可能不会增加严重不良事件的风险。
关于不依从或部分依从常规OSA治疗的患者的长期疗效或有效性的证据有限。
对于已经接受常规治疗的OSA患者,索利那新、阿得拉-莫达非尼和匹托利生可减轻日间嗜睡,索利那新可能更优。不良事件可能增加阿得拉-莫达非尼停药的风险,并可能增加索利那新停药的风险。
无。