Peters Solange, Cho Byoung Chul, Luft Alexander V, Alatorre-Alexander Jorge, Geater Sarayut Lucien, Laktionov Konstantin, Trukhin Dmytro, Kim Sang-We, Ursol Grygorii M, Hussein Maen, Lim Farah Louise, Yang Cheng-Ta, Araujo Luiz Henrique, Saito Haruhiro, Reinmuth Niels, Lowery Caitlin, Mann Helen, Stewart Ross, Jiang Haiyi, Garon Edward B, Mok Tony, Johnson Melissa L
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Thorac Oncol. 2025 Jan;20(1):76-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1381. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
The primary analysis (median follow-up 34.9 mo across all arms) of the phase 3 POSEIDON study revealed a statistically significant overall survival (OS) improvement with first-line tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T+D+CT) versus CT in patients with EGFR and ALK wild-type metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). D+CT had a trend for OS improvement versus CT that did not reach statistical significance. This article reports prespecified OS analyses after long-term follow-up (median >5 y).
A total of 1013 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to T+D+CT, D+CT, or CT, stratified by tumor cell programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50% versus <50%), disease stage (IVA versus IVB), and tumor histologic type (squamous versus nonsquamous). Serious adverse events were collected during follow-up.
After a median follow-up of 63.4 months across all arms, T+D+CT had sustained OS benefit versus CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.89; 5-y OS: 15.7% versus 6.8%). OS improvement with D+CT versus CT (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00; 5-y OS: 13.0%) was consistent with the primary analysis. OS benefit with T+D+CT versus CT remained more pronounced in nonsquamous (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.85) versus squamous (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.65-1.10) mNSCLC. OS benefit with T+D+CT versus CT was still evident regardless of PD-L1 expression, including patients with PD-L1 tumor cell less than 1%, and remained evident in STK11-mutant (nonsquamous), KEAP1-mutant, and KRAS-mutant (nonsquamous) mNSCLC. No new safety signals were identified.
After a median follow-up of more than 5 years, T+D+CT had durable long-term OS benefit versus CT, supporting its use as first-line treatment in mNSCLC, including in patient subgroups with harder-to-treat disease.
3期POSEIDON研究的初步分析(所有治疗组的中位随访时间为34.9个月)显示,对于表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)野生型转移性非小细胞肺癌(mNSCLC)患者,一线使用曲美木单抗联合度伐利尤单抗及化疗(T+D+CT)对比单纯化疗(CT),总生存期(OS)有统计学意义的改善。度伐利尤单抗联合化疗(D+CT)对比单纯化疗在OS改善方面有趋势但未达到统计学意义。本文报告了长期随访(中位随访时间>5年)后的预设OS分析。
共1013例患者按1:1:1随机分为T+D+CT组、D+CT组或CT组,按肿瘤细胞程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)表达(≥50% 对比 <50%)、疾病分期(IVA期对比IVB期)和肿瘤组织学类型(鳞状对比非鳞状)进行分层。随访期间收集严重不良事件。
所有治疗组的中位随访时间为63.4个月,T+D+CT对比CT仍有持续的OS获益(风险比[HR]=0.76,95%置信区间[CI]:0.64 - 0.89;5年OS率:15.7%对比6.8%)。D+CT对比CT的OS改善情况(HR = 0.84,95% CI:0.72 - 1.00;5年OS率:13.0%)与初步分析一致。在非鳞状mNSCLC中,T+D+CT对比CT的OS获益(HR = 0.69,95% CI:0.56 - 0.85)比鳞状mNSCLC(HR = 0.85,95% CI:0.65 - 1.10)更显著。无论PD-L1表达如何,包括PD-L1肿瘤细胞小于1%的患者,T+D+CT对比CT均有OS获益,且在STK11突变(非鳞状)、KEAP1突变和KRAS突变(非鳞状)的mNSCLC中仍很明显。未发现新的安全信号。
中位随访超过5年后,T+D+CT对比CT有持久的长期OS获益,支持其作为mNSCLC的一线治疗,包括在疾病更难治疗的患者亚组中使用。