• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研制孕期生活质量量表(PREG-QOL)。

Developing the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL).

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Midwifery Department, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.

Gulhane Faculty of Nursing, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06771-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06771-x
PMID:39244534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380417/
Abstract

AIM

This study aims to develop the Quality of Life in Pregnancy Scale (PREG-QOL) as a new instrument to evaluate the quality of life during pregnancy and test its psychometric properties.

DESIGN

An instrument development study and psychometric testing of the content and construct validity, factor structure and reliability.

METHODS

The study was conducted in three stages: (1) creating an item pool, (2) preliminary evaluation of items, and (3) refining the scale and evaluating psychometric properties. Instrument development guidelines were used to evaluate content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and stability of the instrument over time. Data to evaluate psychometric properties of the PREG-QOL were collected between April and August 2021.

RESULTS

Items were developed using in-depth interviews with pregnant women and extensive literature review. Scale-content validity index was 0.98. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 26-item instrument with 6 factors, which explained % 56.2 of variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that factors 3 and 5 should be combined into the factor of physical domain since they included items about the same theme. Fit indices obtained by CFA were at sufficient levels. Parallel test method was employed to evaluate the correlation of the PREG-QOL with the SF-36. The findings indicated that the PREG-QOL had high internal inconsistency and stability over time.

CONCLUSION

The PREG-QOL is a valid and reliable instrument in terms of its psychometric characteristics. The 26-item instrument was composed of the five factors of perception of general satisfaction, emotional domain, physical domain, health support systems and social domain.

IMPACT

Displaying good psychometric properties, the PREG-QOL may be used to evaluate multiple dimensions of the quality of life during pregnancy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发孕期生活质量量表(PREG-QOL),作为一种新的工具来评估孕期生活质量,并测试其心理测量学特性。

设计

这是一项仪器开发研究和心理测量测试,用于评估内容和结构有效性、因素结构和可靠性。

方法

研究分三个阶段进行:(1)创建项目池,(2)初步评估项目,以及(3)完善量表并评估心理测量学特性。仪器开发指南用于评估仪器的内容有效性、结构有效性、内部一致性和随时间的稳定性。用于评估 PREG-QOL 心理测量特性的数据于 2021 年 4 月至 8 月收集。

结果

使用对孕妇的深入访谈和广泛的文献回顾开发了项目。量表内容效度指数为 0.98。探索性因子分析显示,一个 26 项的量表有 6 个因子,解释了方差的 56.2%。验证性因子分析(CFA)显示,因子 3 和 5 应合并为身体域的因子,因为它们包含了关于同一主题的项目。CFA 获得的拟合指数处于足够水平。采用平行测试法评估 PREG-QOL 与 SF-36 的相关性。研究结果表明,PREG-QOL 在心理测量学特征方面具有较高的内部一致性和随时间的稳定性。

结论

从心理测量学特征来看,PREG-QOL 是一个有效且可靠的工具。由 26 个项目组成的量表包含五个因素:总体满意度感知、情绪域、身体域、健康支持系统和社会域。

影响

PREG-QOL 具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于评估孕期生活质量的多个维度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2cb/11380417/d34bb30e78a7/12884_2024_6771_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2cb/11380417/60b4fa5b0eff/12884_2024_6771_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2cb/11380417/d34bb30e78a7/12884_2024_6771_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2cb/11380417/60b4fa5b0eff/12884_2024_6771_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2cb/11380417/d34bb30e78a7/12884_2024_6771_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL).研制孕期生活质量量表(PREG-QOL)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06771-x.
2
Psychometric properties of the Persian translation of maternal postpartum quality of life questionnaire (MAPP-QOL).产妇产后生活质量问卷(MAPP-QOL)波斯语翻译版的心理计量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 8;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01781-1.
3
Examining the factorial validity of the Quality of Life Scale.检验生活质量量表的因子有效性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 18;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01292-5.
4
Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: a psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF.中国城市社区居民生活质量:中国版 WHOQOL-BREF 的心理计量学研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Mar 27;12:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-37.
5
Development and psychometric properties of the attitude scale towards female workers in the healthcare settings.医疗保健环境中对女性工作者态度量表的编制及心理测量学特性。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):3238-3253. doi: 10.1111/jan.14859. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
6
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Quality OF Life Radiation Therapy Instrument and the Head & Neck Module (QOL-RTI/H&N).生活质量放疗工具中文版(QOL-RTI/H&N)的翻译和验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 14;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-51.
7
Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population.WHOQOL-BREF 在孕妇人群中的有效性和可靠性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Aug 21;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2.
8
Chronic heart failure health-related quality of life questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20): development and psychometric properties.慢性心力衰竭健康相关生活质量问卷(CHFQOLQ-20):开发和心理测量特性。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03197-9.
9
Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) in Amharic.阿姆哈拉语盆腔器官脱垂生活质量问卷(P-QoL)的翻译、跨文化调适、信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1079-z.
10
Development and psychometric testing of physiopsychological disorders scale for medical rescuers fighting epidemics in China.中国抗击疫情医疗救援人员生理心理障碍量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Public Health Nurs. 2024 May-Jun;41(3):423-437. doi: 10.1111/phn.13291. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Clinician and Group Survey (CG-CAHPS): A Cross-Sectional Study.阿拉伯语版医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估-临床医生及团体调查(CG-CAHPS)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 8;19:955-962. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S508958. eCollection 2025.
2
Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study of the Quality of Life Gravidarum (QOL-GRAV) scale.《孕期生活质量量表(QOL-GRAV)》的土耳其语改编、效度及信度研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07159-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Usability of Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis questionnaire in women hospitalised for hyperemesis gravidarum: a prospective cohort study.用于妊娠剧吐住院妇女的呕吐定量问卷的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e058364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058364.
2
Pregnancy; an opportunity to return to a healthy lifestyle: a qualitative study.妊娠;回归健康生活方式的机会:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04213-6.
3
Evaluation of quality of life in diabetic pregnant women.
评估妊娠糖尿病患者的生活质量。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Feb;16(1):84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.评估探索性项目因子分析中因子解和因子得分估计的质量与适宜性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
5
Hypnosis-based interventions during pregnancy and childbirth and their impact on women's childbirth experience: A systematic review.基于催眠的孕期和分娩干预及其对女性分娩体验的影响:系统评价。
Midwifery. 2020 May;84:102666. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102666. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices.量表开发:提高未来研究实践的十个主要局限性及建议
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Jan 25;30(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1.
7
Factors influencing the quality of life of pregnant women: a systematic review.影响孕妇生活质量的因素:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 23;18(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2087-4.
8
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
9
Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research.论将混合方法探究用作健康结果研究的最佳实践方法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
10
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.评价用于估计内容效度的方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27.