• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Iranian experts' perspectives on facilitators and barriers influencing the infectious disease knowledge network:  A qualitative study.伊朗专家对影响传染病知识网络的促进因素和障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11525-8.
2
Barriers and facilitators to reducing low-value care for the management of low back pain in Iran: a qualitative multi-professional study.伊朗减少低价值医疗以管理下背痛的障碍和促进因素:一项定性多专业研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17597-1.
3
Development of evidence-based health policy documents in developing countries: a case of Iran.发展中国家循证卫生政策文件的制定:以伊朗为例。
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Feb 7;6(3):27-36. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n3p27.
4
University innovation and start-ups: Barriers and facilitators experienced by nursing faculties - A content analysis study.大学创新与创业:护理教师所经历的障碍和促进因素——一项内容分析研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 May;11(5):e2190. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2190.
5
Facilitators and barriers to implement nurse-led interventions in long-term dementia care: a qualitative interview study with Swiss nursing experts and managers.在长期痴呆症护理中实施护士主导干预的促进因素和障碍:对瑞士护理专家和管理人员的定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02120-1.
6
Understanding patient-related barriers to hydroxyurea use among adolescent and adult patients with sickle cell disease in Mulago and Kiruddu hospitals, Uganda, a qualitative study.乌干达穆拉戈和基鲁杜医院青少年和成年镰状细胞病患者使用羟基脲的相关障碍的定性研究:患者相关障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 27;24(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11125-6.
7
The barriers and facilitators of Iranian men's involvement in perinatal care: a qualitative study.伊朗男性参与围产期保健的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 21;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01350-9.
8
Healthcare providers' perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study.医疗保健提供者对同情心的感知障碍和促进因素的看法:扎根理论研究的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):2083-2097. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14357.
9
A qualitative exploration of experts' views about multi-dimensional aspects of hookah smoking control in Iran.伊朗专家对水烟吸烟多维度控制观点的定性探索。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 22;24(1):1665. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19139-9.
10
Patient perspective on the elimination mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B in Bali, Indonesia: a qualitative study.患者视角下印度尼西亚巴厘岛消除母婴传播艾滋病毒、梅毒和乙型肝炎的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):2258. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19692-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: A systematic literature review.影响知识网络和实践社区中科学专家之间知识共享的因素:一项系统的文献综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Apr 29;13:136. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_280_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Reopening Oral Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic through a Knowledge Exchange Coalition.通过知识交流联盟在 COVID-19 大流行期间重新开放口腔健康服务。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Jul;6(3):279-290. doi: 10.1177/23800844211011985. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Control and prevention of infectious diseases from a One Health perspective.从“同一健康”视角看传染病的防控
Genet Mol Biol. 2021 Jan 29;44(1 Suppl 1):e20200256. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2020-0256. eCollection 2021.
4
Integrating evidence from research into decision-making for controlling endemic tropical diseases in South East Nigeria: perceptions of producers and users of evidence on barriers and solutions.将研究证据整合到东南尼日利亚控制地方性热带病的决策中:对证据生产者和使用者对障碍和解决方案的看法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jan 13;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0518-y.
5
Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases in Iran.伊朗的新发和再发传染病
Iran J Microbiol. 2017 Jun;9(3):122-142.
6
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 4 部分:可信性和出版。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Financing of international collective action for epidemic and pandemic preparedness.为防范流行病和大流行病进行国际集体行动的融资。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Aug;5(8):e742-e744. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30203-6. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work?共同思考:是什么让实践社群发挥作用?
Hum Relat. 2017 Apr;70(4):389-409. doi: 10.1177/0018726716661040. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
9
Medicine information exchange networks among healthcare professionals and prescribing in geriatric medicine wards.老年医学病房中医护人员之间的医学信息交流网络及处方开具情况。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;83(6):1185-1196. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13222. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Support of public-private partnerships in health promotion and conflicts of interest.支持公私伙伴关系在促进健康和利益冲突方面的作用。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 18;6(4):e009342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009342.

伊朗专家对影响传染病知识网络的促进因素和障碍的看法:一项定性研究。

Iranian experts' perspectives on facilitators and barriers influencing the infectious disease knowledge network:  A qualitative study.

机构信息

Ph.D in Medical Library & Information Science, School of Health Management & Information Sciences, Student Research Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11525-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11525-8
PMID:39244579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380772/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge networks, such as Communities of Practice (CoP), are essential elements of knowledge management. They play a crucial role in assimilating various knowledge domains and converting individual knowledge into collective knowledge. This study aimed to assess the concept of knowledge networks and identify facilitators and barriers influencing knowledge sharing in infectious diseases, according to Iranian experts.

METHODS

This qualitative study employed content analysis and used purposive and snowball sampling. The data were collected via online or face-to-face interviews with 25 participants with diverse expertise in infectious diseases (both clinical and non-clinical), epidemiology, knowledge management, and knowledge-based business management in Iran. The thematic analysis technique was used to code the interviews, and the collected data were analyzed using MAXQDA 20 software.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis of the interviews led to 437 codes. These codes were categorized into two groups: facilitators and barriers. The facilitators shaping the knowledge network for infectious diseases were classified into three main categories: individual factors, organizational factors, and communication mechanisms. Individual factors involved two themes: strengthening knowledge exchange between experts in infectious diseases and personal characteristics such as the criteria for network membership. Organizational factors comprised three themes: organizational and trans-organizational factors, management strategies, and interactions with non-governmental sectors. Communication mechanisms included two themes: the use of information technology and knowledge brokers. In addition, three important challenges were identified as barriers influencing the knowledge network: administration and policy-making, organizational and trans-organizational, and personal challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Several facilitators and barriers influence the formation of an infectious disease knowledge network, which must be addressed to ensure its effectiveness, development, and long-term sustainability. Addressing these factors will enable the network to effectively integrate diverse knowledge and contribute to advancing infectious disease management.

摘要

背景

知识网络,如实践社区(CoP),是知识管理的重要组成部分。它们在整合各种知识领域和将个体知识转化为集体知识方面发挥着关键作用。本研究旨在评估知识网络的概念,并根据伊朗专家的意见,确定影响传染病知识共享的促进因素和障碍。

方法

本定性研究采用内容分析法,采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样。通过在线或面对面访谈的方式,对 25 名具有不同专长的参与者(包括临床和非临床传染病、流行病学、知识管理以及伊朗基于知识的企业管理)进行了数据收集。采用主题分析技术对访谈进行编码,并使用 MAXQDA 20 软件对收集的数据进行分析。

结果

对访谈的主题分析产生了 437 个代码。这些代码分为促进因素和障碍两个组。塑造传染病知识网络的促进因素分为三个主要类别:个人因素、组织因素和沟通机制。个人因素包括两个主题:加强传染病专家之间的知识交流和个人特征,如网络成员的标准。组织因素包括三个主题:组织和跨组织因素、管理策略以及与非政府部门的互动。沟通机制包括两个主题:信息技术的使用和知识经纪人。此外,还确定了三个影响知识网络的重要障碍:管理和决策制定、组织和跨组织以及个人挑战。

结论

形成传染病知识网络的促进因素和障碍有很多,必须加以解决,以确保其有效性、发展和长期可持续性。解决这些因素将使网络能够有效地整合各种知识,为传染病管理的发展做出贡献。