Hsiao Kai-Yuan, Chen Hsin-Pao, Rau Kun-Ming, Liu Kuang-Wen, Shia Ben-Chang, Chang Wei-Shan, Liang Hao-Yun, Hsieh Meng-Che
Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Oncologist. 2024 Dec 6;29(12):e1669-e1679. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae235.
The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both.
Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS).
After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location.
TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.
在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中,肿瘤位置对后线治疗生存率的影响尚不确定。本研究旨在调查接受曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶(TAS-102)或瑞戈非尼或两者治疗的化疗难治性mCRC患者中,肿瘤位置与生存率之间的关联。
回顾性收集2015年至2020年间接受TAS-102或瑞戈非尼治疗的mCRC患者。患者被分为TAS-102优先组和瑞戈非尼优先组,然后再细分为TAS-102序贯瑞戈非尼(T-R)组和瑞戈非尼序贯TAS-102(R-T)组。肿瘤学结局用至治疗失败时间(TTF)和总生存期(OS)表示。
匹配后,纳入376例接受TAS-102治疗的患者和376例接受瑞戈非尼治疗的患者进行结局比较。TAS-102组和瑞戈非尼组的TTF无显著差异,但OS有显著差异。TAS-102组和瑞戈非尼组的中位TTF分别为1.9个月和2.0个月(P = 0.701),中位OS分别为9.1个月和7.0个月(P = 0.008)。无论原发肿瘤位置如何,OS获益均一致。对174例T-R患者和174例R-T患者进行亚组分析以研究治疗顺序。两组的TTF和OS均有显著差异。T-R组和R-T组的中位TTF分别为8.5个月和6.3个月(P = 0.001),中位OS分别为14.4个月和12.6个月(P = 0.035)。无论原发肿瘤位置如何,TTF和OS获益均持续存在。
在所有肿瘤位置的化疗难治性mCRC患者中,优先使用TAS-102可带来更好的生存获益。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证我们的结论。