Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 4;30(6):5456-5469. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30060413.
Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice.
In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes.
The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) ( = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T ( = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) ( = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) ( = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies.
The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.
难治性 mCRC 患者很少接受三线或后续治疗。这一策略可能会对他们的生存产生负面影响。在这种情况下,regorafenib(R)和曲氟尿苷/盐酸替匹嘧啶(T)是两种关键的新治疗选择,在总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制方面具有统计学意义的改善,同时具有不同的耐受谱。本研究旨在回顾性评估这些药物在真实世界实践中的疗效和安全性。
2012 年至 2022 年,从 13 家意大利癌症研究所回顾性招募了 866 名接受序贯 R 和 T(T/R,n=146;R/T,n=116)或 T(n=325)或 R(n=279)治疗的 mCRC 患者。
R/T 组的中位 OS 明显长于 T/R 组(15.9 个月 vs. 13.9 个月)(=0.0194)。R/T 序贯在 mPFS 方面具有统计学优势,T/R 组为 8.8 个月,R/T 组为 11.2 个月(=0.0005)。我们未发现仅接受 T 或 R 治疗的组之间在结果上有显著差异。共记录到 582 例 3/4 级毒性反应。R/T 序贯组手足皮肤反应 3/4 级的频率高于逆序组(37.3% vs. 7.4%)(=0.01),而 R/T 组的 3/4 级中性粒细胞减少症略低于 T/R 组(66.2% vs. 78.2%)(=0.13)。非序贯组的毒性反应与既往研究相似。
与逆序组相比,R/T 序贯可显著延长 OS 和 PFS,并改善疾病控制。不序贯使用 R 和 T 对生存的影响相似。需要更多的数据来确定最佳的序贯方案,并探索序贯(T/R 或 R/T)治疗联合分子靶向药物的疗效。