Department of Ultrasound, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, No 15, Jiefang Avenue, Xiangyang, 441000, Hubei, China.
Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, 75 Tongzhenguan Road, Wuxi, 214200, Jiangsu, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 8;14(1):20893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71780-x.
Investigate the impact of remnant cholesterol (RC) levels on carotid artery intima thickness (CIT) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. From September 2021 to September 2023, a prospective multicenter study involved 158 T2DM patients. They were divided into a higher RC group (n = 80) and a lower RC group (n = 78) based on median RC levels. Additionally, 92 healthy volunteers served as the control group. CIT, carotid media thickness (CMT), and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) were measured. General clinical data, lab results, CIMT, CIT, and CMT differences among the three groups were compared. Multiple regression analysis explored CIT factors in T2DM patients. 1. No significant sex, age, BMI, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), T2DM duration, fasting blood glucose, or glycated hemoglobin differences were found among the groups (p > 0.05). 2. CIMT and CIT were significantly higher in T2DM than the control group (p < 0.05). 3. The higher RC group had thicker CIT than the lower RC group (p < 0.05), while CIMT differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed RC as an influencing CIT factor in T2DM patients (β = 0.473, p = 0.005). CIT is significantly thicker in T2DM patients with higher RC than in those with lower RC, and RC is the influence factor of CIT, which suggests that more attention should be paid to the detection of RC in T2DM patients.
探讨 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者残余胆固醇(RC)水平对颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIT)的影响。2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月,一项前瞻性多中心研究纳入了 158 例 T2DM 患者。根据 RC 中位数将其分为 RC 较高组(n=80)和 RC 较低组(n=78)。此外,92 名健康志愿者作为对照组。测量 CIT、颈动脉中层厚度(CMT)和颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)。比较三组间一般临床资料、实验室结果、CIMT、CIT 和 CMT 的差异。采用多元回归分析探讨 T2DM 患者 CIT 的影响因素。1. 三组间性别、年龄、BMI、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、T2DM 病程、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。2. T2DM 组 CIMT 和 CIT 均高于对照组(p<0.05)。3. RC 较高组的 CIT 高于 RC 较低组(p<0.05),而 CIMT 差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示 RC 是 T2DM 患者 CIT 的影响因素(β=0.473,p=0.005)。RC 较高的 T2DM 患者的 CIT 明显较厚,RC 是 CIT 的影响因素,这提示在 T2DM 患者中应更加关注 RC 的检测。