Department of Medical Education, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Department of Medical Education, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Sep;36(3):327-333. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.306. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
This study aimed to investigate the difference in satisfaction and learning benefits between e-portfolios compared to paper portfolios during clinical practice in medical schools.
Utilization of and satisfaction with e-portfolios among 40 third-year medical students in the medicine department of Ajou University School of Medicine was collected using an online survey in December 2020. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an analysis of variance.
Students perceived that e-portfolios were highly beneficial for consistently documenting activities during clinical practice, when compared to paper-based portfolios (mean±standard deviation [SD]=2.60±1.22). However, the least rated aspect was that e-portfolios require less time than paper-based portfolios (mean±SD=1.80±1.14). Additionally, among the various clinical practice courses using e-portfolios, the highest satisfaction was observed with the fewest content items in the e-portfolio.
To maximize the potential benefits of e-portfolios, improvements in implementation and usability are essential. Additionally, for effective utilization of e-portfolios in clinical practice, it is necessary to clearly define students' required competencies and ultimate goals, and structure content accordingly.
本研究旨在调查医学院临床实习中电子档案与纸质档案相比在满意度和学习收益方面的差异。
2020 年 12 月，采用在线调查的方式，收集了 40 名在 Ajou 大学医学院医学系三年级医学生使用电子档案的情况和满意度。使用描述性统计和方差分析对收集到的数据进行分析。
与纸质档案相比，学生认为电子档案在持续记录临床实践活动方面非常有益（平均值±标准差[SD]=2.60±1.22）。然而，评分最低的方面是电子档案比纸质档案需要的时间更少（平均值±SD=1.80±1.14）。此外，在使用电子档案的各种临床实践课程中，电子档案中内容项目最少的满意度最高。
为了最大限度地发挥电子档案的潜在优势，必须改进实施和可用性。此外，为了在临床实践中有效地利用电子档案，有必要明确界定学生的所需能力和最终目标，并相应地构建内容。
