• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对韩国医学预科学生基于项目组合的自我发展课程的评估。

Evaluation of a portfolio-based course on self-development for pre-medical students in Korea.

作者信息

Yoo Dong Mi, Cho A Ra, Kim Sun

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:38. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.38. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.38
PMID:32299188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7040426/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We have developed and operated a portfolio-based course aimed at strengthening pre-medical students' capabilities for self-management and self-improvement. In order to determine the effectiveness of the course and to establish future operational strategies, we evaluated the course and the students' learning experience.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 97 students of a pre-medical course "Self-development and portfolio I" in 2019. Their learning experience was evaluated through the professor's assessment of portfolios they had submitted, and the program was evaluated based on the responses of 68 students who completed a survey. The survey questionnaire included 32 items. Descriptive statistics were reported for quantitative data, including the mean and standard deviation. Opinions collected from the open-ended question were grouped into categories.

RESULTS

The evaluation of students' portfolios showed that only 6.2% of the students' portfolios were well-organized, with specific goals, strategies, processes, and self-reflections, while most lacked the basic components of a portfolio (46.4%) or contained insufficient content (47.4%). Students' responses to the survey showed that regular portfolio personality assessments (72.1%), team (64.7%), and individual (60.3%) activities were felt to be more appropriate as educational methods for this course, rather than lectures. Turning to the portfolio creation experience, the forms and components of the portfolios (68.2%) and the materials provided (62.2%) were felt to be appropriate. However, students felt that individual autonomy needed to be reflected more (66.7%) and that this course interfered with other studies (42.5%).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that standardized samples, guidelines, and sufficient time for autonomous portfolio creation should be provided. In addition, education on portfolio utilization should be conducted in small groups in the future.

摘要

目的

我们开发并运营了一门基于作品集的课程,旨在增强医学预科学生的自我管理和自我提升能力。为了确定该课程的有效性并制定未来的运营策略,我们对该课程及学生的学习体验进行了评估。

方法

本研究的对象是2019年医学预科课程“自我发展与作品集I”的97名学生。通过教授对他们提交的作品集的评估来评价他们的学习体验,并根据68名完成调查的学生的回答对该课程进行评估。调查问卷包括32个项目。对定量数据报告描述性统计,包括均值和标准差。从开放式问题收集的意见被归类。

结果

对学生作品集的评估表明,只有6.2%的学生作品集组织良好,有具体目标、策略、过程和自我反思,而大多数作品集缺乏作品集的基本组成部分(46.4%)或内容不足(47.4%)。学生对调查的回答表明,定期的作品集个性评估(72.1%)、团队(64.7%)和个人(60.3%)活动被认为比讲座更适合作为本课程的教育方法。谈到作品集创作体验,作品集的形式和组成部分(68.2%)以及提供的材料(62.2%)被认为是合适的。然而,学生们认为个人自主性需要更多体现(66.7%),并且该课程干扰了其他学习(42.5%)。

结论

本研究结果表明,应提供标准化样本、指导方针和足够的自主创作作品集时间。此外,未来应分组进行作品集利用方面的教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/2238b81898c1/jeehp-16-38f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/93fee2a72667/jeehp-16-38f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/0490c6f33004/jeehp-16-38f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/b194427547c5/jeehp-16-38f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/2238b81898c1/jeehp-16-38f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/93fee2a72667/jeehp-16-38f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/0490c6f33004/jeehp-16-38f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/b194427547c5/jeehp-16-38f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/7040426/2238b81898c1/jeehp-16-38f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a portfolio-based course on self-development for pre-medical students in Korea.对韩国医学预科学生基于项目组合的自我发展课程的评估。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:38. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.38. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
2
Students' perception of portfolio as a learning tool at King Abdulaziz University Medical School.阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医学院学生对档案袋作为学习工具的看法。
Med Teach. 2018 Sep;40(sup1):S104-S113. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1466054. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
3
Feasibility and Outcomes of Implementing a Portfolio Assessment System Alongside a Traditional Grading System.在传统评分系统之外实施档案袋评估系统的可行性与结果
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1554-1560. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001168.
4
Undergraduate medical students' views about a reflective portfolio assessment of their communication skills learning.本科医学生对其沟通技能学习的反思性档案评估的看法。
Med Educ. 2004 Feb;38(2):125-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01750.x.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
A Web-based geriatrics portfolio to document medical students' learning outcomes.一个用于记录医学生学习成果的基于网络的老年医学档案袋。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):937-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00043.
7
Portfolios as a learning tool in obstetrics and gynaecology undergraduate training.档案袋作为妇产科本科培训中的一种学习工具。
Med Educ. 2001 Dec;35(12):1125-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01054.x.
8
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
9
E-portfolio utilization in medical school clinical practice: assessing satisfaction and learning advantages.电子Portfolio 在医学院临床实习中的应用:评估满意度和学习优势。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Sep;36(3):327-333. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.306. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
10
Students' attitudes towards the introduction of a Personal and Professional Development portfolio: potential barriers and facilitators.学生对引入个人与专业发展档案的态度:潜在的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Dec 1;9:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-69.

引用本文的文献

1
Early perceptions of portfolios in an outcome-based curriculum.对基于结果的课程体系中档案袋的早期认知。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07583-z.
2
Assessing the Impact of the Portfolio Workshop and the Use of the Rubric Matrix for Reflective Writing on Medical Faculty and Students.评估组合工作坊以及使用评分矩阵进行反思性写作对医学教师和学生的影响。
Cureus. 2024 May 2;16(5):e59530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59530. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review.医学生档案袋:一项系统性综述

本文引用的文献

1
Students' perception of portfolio as a learning tool at King Abdulaziz University Medical School.阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医学院学生对档案袋作为学习工具的看法。
Med Teach. 2018 Sep;40(sup1):S104-S113. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1466054. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
2
Longitudinal evaluation of a pilot e-portfolio-based supervision programme for final year medical students: views of students, supervisors and new graduates.基于电子档案的实习医师带教方案的纵向评估:实习医师、带教老师和新毕业生的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0981-5.
3
Qualitative study of the impact of an authentic electronic portfolio in undergraduate medical education.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Mar 3;9:23821205221076022. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Development and validation of a portfolio assessment system for medical schools in Korea.韩国医学院校组合评估系统的开发与验证。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:39. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.39. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
本科医学教育中真实电子档案袋影响的定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 17;14:265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0265-2.
4
An electronic portfolio for quantitative assessment of surgical skills in undergraduate medical education.电子档案袋用于评估本科医学教育中外科技能的量化评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 6;13:65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-65.
5
Students' reflections in a portfolio pilot: highlighting professional issues.学生在档案袋试点中的反思:突出专业问题。
Med Teach. 2010;32(12):e532-40. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.509420.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment.《医学教育教师发展指南》第24号:档案袋作为学生评估的一种方法
Med Teach. 2001 Oct;23(6):535-551. doi: 10.1080/01421590120090952.