• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可解释方法探索男性患者的健康素养行为模式。

Exploring the Health Literacy Behavior Patterns of Male Patients Using an Interpretable Method.

作者信息

Huang Lizhen, Jin Yanjun, Chien Ching-Wen, Xu Qinyi, Chuang Yen-Ching, Tung Tao-Hsin

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, People's Republic of China.

Department of Urology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, 317000 People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;17:2099-2109. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S465702. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S465702
PMID:39246590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving overall and individual health literacy is a major focus of national initiatives in China and similar initiatives globally. However, few studies have examined the identification and improvement of individual health literacy levels, especially among patients.

PURPOSE

To develop an interpretable method with decision rules to assess the health literacy levels of male patients and identify key factors influencing health literacy levels.

METHODS

Using a convenience sampling method, we conducted on-site surveys with 212 male patients of a hospital in China from July 2020 to September 2020. The questionnaire was developed by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. A total of 206 of the completed surveys were ultimately included for analyses in this study. The rough set theory was used to identify conditional attributes (ie, key factors) and decision attributes (ie, levels of health literacy) and to establish decision rules between them. These rules specifically describe how different combinations of conditional attributes can affect health literacy levels among men.

RESULTS

Basic knowledge, concepts, and health skills are important in identifying whether male patients have health literacy. Health skills, scientific health concepts, healthy lifestyles and behaviors, infectious disease prevention and control literacy, basic medical literacy, and health information literacy can be identified as cognitive behaviors with varying degrees of health literacy among patients.

CONCLUSION

This model can effectively identify the key factors and decision rules for male patients' health literacy. Simultaneously, it can be applied to clinical nursing practice, making it easier for hospitals to guide male patients to improve their health literacy.

摘要

背景

提高全民健康素养和个体健康素养是中国国家倡议以及全球类似倡议的主要重点。然而,很少有研究探讨个体健康素养水平的识别与提高,尤其是在患者中。

目的

开发一种具有决策规则的可解释方法,以评估男性患者的健康素养水平,并确定影响健康素养水平的关键因素。

方法

采用便利抽样法,于2020年7月至2020年9月对中国一家医院的212名男性患者进行现场调查。问卷由中华人民共和国卫生部编制。本研究最终纳入了206份完成的调查问卷进行分析。运用粗糙集理论识别条件属性(即关键因素)和决策属性(即健康素养水平),并建立它们之间的决策规则。这些规则具体描述了条件属性的不同组合如何影响男性的健康素养水平。

结果

基础知识、概念和健康技能对于识别男性患者是否具备健康素养很重要。健康技能、科学健康概念、健康生活方式和行为、传染病防控素养、基本医疗素养和健康信息素养可被确定为患者中具有不同程度健康素养的认知行为。

结论

该模型能够有效识别男性患者健康素养的关键因素和决策规则。同时,它可应用于临床护理实践,使医院更易于指导男性患者提高其健康素养。

相似文献

1
Exploring the Health Literacy Behavior Patterns of Male Patients Using an Interpretable Method.使用可解释方法探索男性患者的健康素养行为模式。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;17:2099-2109. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S465702. eCollection 2024.
2
Application of Rough Set Theory to Improve Outpatient Medical Service Quality in Public Hospitals Based on the Patient Perspective.基于患者视角的粗糙集理论在公立医院门诊医疗服务质量改进中的应用
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;9:739119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.739119. eCollection 2021.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
Nurses' health education competence and health literacy: A cross-sectional survey in Chinese county hospitals.护士的健康教育能力与健康素养:中国县级医院的横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104042. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104042. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
5
[Disaster Literacy Status and the Influencing Factors: A National Survey of 107997 Chinese Nurses].[灾害素养现状及影响因素:对107997名中国护士的全国性调查]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jul;54(4):824-830. doi: 10.12182/20230760101.
6
Development of an index system for the scientific literacy of medical staff: a modified Delphi study in China.开发医务人员科学素养评价指标体系:中国德尔菲法改良研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05350-0.
7
Self-reported eHealth literacy skills among nursing students in Sri Lanka: A cross-sectional study.斯里兰卡护理专业学生自我报告的电子健康素养技能:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Jul;78:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
The effect of health literacy and self-management efficacy on the health-related quality of life of hypertensive patients in a western rural area of China: a cross-sectional study.健康素养和自我管理效能对中国西部农村地区高血压患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 1;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0551-9.
9
Relationship between Health Literacy, Health-Related Behaviors and Health Status: A Survey of Elderly Chinese.健康素养、健康相关行为与健康状况之间的关系:一项针对中国老年人的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 18;12(8):9714-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120809714.
10
COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors and Health Literacy, Information Evaluation, and Decision-making Skills in Japanese Adults: Cross-sectional Survey Study.日本成年人的新冠病毒预防行为、健康素养、信息评估及决策技能:横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 24;6(1):e34966. doi: 10.2196/34966.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of health literacy in a French emergency department.法国一家急诊科的健康素养评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11003-1.
2
Exploration of pressure injury risk in adult inpatients: An integrated Braden scale and rough set approach.成人住院患者压疮风险的探索:Braden 量表与粗糙集方法的综合应用。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Feb;80:103567. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103567. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Revised Chinese resident health literacy scale for the older adults in China: simplified version and initial validity testing.
中国老年人修订版居民健康素养量表简体中文版的简化版和初步有效性检验。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 17;11:1147862. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147862. eCollection 2023.
4
Factors Considered Important by Healthcare Professionals for the Management of Using Complementary Therapy in Diabetes: A Text-Mining Analysis.医疗保健专业人员认为在糖尿病管理中使用补充疗法的重要因素:文本挖掘分析。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Jun 1;41(6):426-433. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000977.
5
Does health literacy promote COVID-19 awareness? Evidence from Zhejiang, China.健康素养能否提高对新冠病毒的认识?来自中国浙江的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;10:894050. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894050. eCollection 2022.
6
Machine learning-based risk factor analysis and prevalence prediction of intestinal parasitic infections using epidemiological survey data.基于机器学习的肠道寄生虫感染风险因素分析及流行预测:利用流行病学调查数据。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Jun 14;16(6):e0010517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010517. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
How to predict the electronic health literacy of Chinese primary and secondary school students?: establishment of a model and web nomograms.如何预测中国中小学生的电子健康素养?:模型的建立和网络诺模图。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 25;22(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13421-4.
8
A multi-source information fusion approach in tunnel collapse risk analysis based on improved Dempster-Shafer evidence theory.一种基于改进的Dempster-Shafer证据理论的隧道坍塌风险分析中的多源信息融合方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07171-x.
9
Application of Rough Set Theory to Improve Outpatient Medical Service Quality in Public Hospitals Based on the Patient Perspective.基于患者视角的粗糙集理论在公立医院门诊医疗服务质量改进中的应用
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;9:739119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.739119. eCollection 2021.
10
Improving Patient Health Literacy in Hospitals - A Challenge for Hospital Health Education Programs.提高医院患者的健康素养——医院健康教育项目面临的一项挑战。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Oct 28;14:4415-4424. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S332220. eCollection 2021.