Mitchell Hannah K, Seaton Sarah E, Leahy Christopher, Mustafa Khurram, Buckley Hannah, Davis Peter, Feltbower Richard G, Ramnarayan Padmanabhan
Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England.
Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 16;75:102776. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102776. eCollection 2024 Sep.
There is emerging evidence on the impact of social and environmental determinants of health on paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and outcomes. We analysed UK paediatric intensive care data to explore disparities in the incidence of admission according to a child's ethnicity and the degree of deprivation and pollution in the child's residential area.
Data were extracted on children <16 years admitted to UK PICUs between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2021 from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database. Ethnicity was categorised as White, Asian, Black, Mixed or Other. Deprivation was quantified using the 'children in low-income families' measure and outdoor air pollution was characterised using mean annual PM2.5 level at local authority level, both divided into population-weighted quintiles. UK population estimates were used to calculate crude incidence of PICU admission. Incidence rate ratios were calculated using Poisson regression models.
There were 245,099 admissions, of which 60.7% were unplanned. After adjusting for age and sex, Asian and Black children had higher relative incidence of unplanned PICU admission compared to White (IRR 1.29 [95% CI: 1.25-1.33] and 1.50 [95% CI: 1.44-1.56] respectively), but there was no evidence of increased incidence of planned admission. Children living in the most deprived quintile had 1.50 times the incidence of admission in the least deprived quintile (95% CI: 1.46-1.54). There were higher crude admission levels of children living in the most polluted quintile compared to the least (157.8 vs 113.6 admissions per 100,000 child years), but after adjustment for ethnicity, deprivation, age and sex there was no association between pollution and PICU admission (IRR 1.00 [95% CI: 1.00-1.00] per 1 μg/m increase).
Ethnicity and deprivation impact the incidence of PICU admission. When restricting to unplanned respiratory admissions and ventilated patients only, increasing pollution level was associated with increased incidence of PICU admission. It is essential to act to reduce these observed disparities, further work is needed to understand mechanisms behind these findings and how they relate to outcomes.
There was no direct funding for this project. HM was funded by an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship (ACF-2022-18-017).
关于健康的社会和环境决定因素对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)收治情况及治疗结果的影响,已有新证据出现。我们分析了英国儿科重症监护数据,以探讨根据儿童种族以及其居住地区的贫困程度和污染程度在收治发生率上的差异。
从儿科重症监护审计网络(PICANet)数据库中提取2008年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间入住英国PICU的16岁以下儿童的数据。种族分为白人、亚洲人、黑人、混血或其他。贫困程度使用“低收入家庭儿童”指标进行量化,室外空气污染以地方当局层面的年均PM2.5水平来表征,两者均分为人口加权五分位数。使用英国人口估计数来计算PICU收治的粗发生率。发生率比值使用泊松回归模型计算。
共有245,099例收治病例,其中60.7%为非计划收治。在对年龄和性别进行调整后,与白人儿童相比,亚洲和黑人儿童非计划入住PICU的相对发生率更高(发生率比值分别为1.29 [95%置信区间:1.25 - 1.33]和1.50 [95%置信区间:1.44 - 1.56]),但没有证据表明计划收治的发生率增加。生活在最贫困五分位数地区的儿童的收治发生率是最不贫困五分位数地区儿童的1.50倍(95%置信区间:1.46 - 1.54)。与污染程度最低的地区相比,污染程度最高的五分位数地区儿童的粗收治水平更高(每10万个儿童年中分别为157.8例和113.6例收治),但在对种族、贫困程度、年龄和性别进行调整后,污染与PICU收治之间没有关联(每增加1μg/m,发生率比值为1.00 [95%置信区间:1.00 - 1.00])。
种族和贫困程度会影响PICU收治发生率。仅限制在非计划呼吸疾病收治病例和使用呼吸机的患者中,污染水平的增加与PICU收治发生率的增加相关。采取行动减少这些观察到的差异至关重要,需要进一步开展工作来了解这些发现背后的机制以及它们与治疗结果之间如何关联。
该项目没有直接资金支持。HM由英国国家卫生研究院学术临床奖学金(ACF - 2022 - 18 - 017)资助。