Li Dongxuan, Qin Chunmeng, Wang Hongli, Du Dan, Wang Yalan, Du Qian, Liu Songqing
Department of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Sep 6;15:20420986241274909. doi: 10.1177/20420986241274909. eCollection 2024.
The use of antineoplastic agents is one of the important triggers of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), but there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding of antineoplastic agents that may trigger TLS and the TLS risk differences between different antineoplastic agents.
This study aims to investigate the TLS risk of different antineoplastic agents and provide reference information for clinical practice.
Real-world adverse events data in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were used as the basis for the disproportionality analysis.
We reviewed the TLS reports in the FAERS database from 2004 to 2022 to summarize an antineoplastic agent list that was reported to trigger TLS, based on which we conducted disproportionality analysis to assess the TLS risk of each antineoplastic agent.
In all, 164 antineoplastic agents were reported to trigger TLS. On the whole, rituximab was the most reported antineoplastic agent in TLS reports, followed by cyclophosphamide, venetoclax, doxorubicin, and etoposide, while tagraxofusp was the antineoplastic agent with the highest adverse drug reaction (ADR) signal strength in signal detection, followed by floxuridine, pentostatin, tebentafusp, and venetoclax. Integrating ADR signal detection results, 129 of 164 antineoplastic agents showed at least one positive ADR signal, and six antineoplastic agents (bevacizumab, carboplatin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, lenvatinib, and paclitaxel) have the highest total number of positive signals. Further classifying the 164 antineoplastic agents into 46 chemical subgroups to conduct ADR signal detection, nitrogen mustard analogs were the most reported antineoplastic agent subclasses, followed by clusters of differentiation 20 inhibitors, and pyrimidine analogs, while clusters of differentiation 22 inhibitors were the antineoplastic agent subclass with the highest ADR signal strength, followed by podophyllotoxin derivatives and actinomycines.
Our study showed the TLS risk characteristics of 164 antineoplastic agents by detecting and integrating ADR signals, which may help to optimize clinical practice.
使用抗肿瘤药物是肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)的重要触发因素之一,但对于可能引发TLS的抗肿瘤药物以及不同抗肿瘤药物之间的TLS风险差异仍缺乏全面了解。
本研究旨在调查不同抗肿瘤药物的TLS风险,并为临床实践提供参考信息。
以美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的真实世界不良事件数据为基础进行不成比例分析。
我们回顾了2004年至2022年FAERS数据库中的TLS报告,以总结据报道可引发TLS的抗肿瘤药物清单,并在此基础上进行不成比例分析,以评估每种抗肿瘤药物的TLS风险。
总共164种抗肿瘤药物被报告可引发TLS。总体而言,利妥昔单抗是TLS报告中被提及最多的抗肿瘤药物,其次是环磷酰胺、维奈克拉、多柔比星和依托泊苷,而他格拉佛素是信号检测中不良药物反应(ADR)信号强度最高的抗肿瘤药物,其次是氟尿苷、喷司他丁、替贝福斯和维奈克拉。综合ADR信号检测结果,164种抗肿瘤药物中有129种显示至少一个阳性ADR信号,六种抗肿瘤药物(贝伐单抗、卡铂、顺铂、氟尿嘧啶、乐伐替尼和紫杉醇)的阳性信号总数最高。将这164种抗肿瘤药物进一步分为46个化学亚组进行ADR信号检测,氮芥类似物是被提及最多的抗肿瘤药物亚类,其次是分化簇20抑制剂和嘧啶类似物,而分化簇22抑制剂是ADR信号强度最高的抗肿瘤药物亚类,其次是鬼臼毒素衍生物和放线菌素。
我们的研究通过检测和整合ADR信号展示了164种抗肿瘤药物的TLS风险特征,这可能有助于优化临床实践。