• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物警戒数据库中的真实世界数据为理解抗菌药物暴露相关感染风险提供了新视角。

Real-World Data in Pharmacovigilance Database Provides a New Perspective for Understanding the Risk of Infection Associated with Antibacterial Drug Exposure.

作者信息

Li Dongxuan, Song Yi, Bai Zhanfeng, Xi Xin, Liu Feng, Zhang Yang, Qin Chunmeng, Du Dan, Du Qian, Liu Songqing

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401120, China.

College of Pharmacy, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;12(7):1109. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071109.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics12071109
PMID:37508205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10376141/
Abstract

Antibacterial drug exposure (ADE) is a well-known potential risk factor for infection (CDI), but it remains controversial which certain antibacterial drugs are associated with the highest risk of CDI occurrence. To summarize CDI risk associated with ADE, we reviewed the CDI reports related to ADE in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and conducted disproportionality analysis to detect adverse reaction (ADR) signals of CDI for antibacterial drugs. A total of 8063 CDI reports associated with ADE were identified, which involved 73 antibacterial drugs. Metronidazole was the drug with the greatest number of reports, followed by vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin and amoxicillin. In disproportionality analysis, metronidazole had the highest positive ADR signal strength, followed by vancomycin, cefpodoxime, ertapenem and clindamycin. Among the 73 antibacterial drugs, 58 showed at least one positive ADR signal, and ceftriaxone was the drug with the highest total number of positive signals. Our study provided a real-world overview of CDI risk for AED from a pharmacovigilance perspective and showed risk characteristics for different antibacterial drugs by integrating its positive-negative signal distribution. Meanwhile, our study showed that the CDI risk of metronidazole and vancomycin may be underestimated, and it deserves further attention and investigation.

摘要

抗菌药物暴露(ADE)是艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的一个众所周知的潜在风险因素,但某些抗菌药物与CDI发生的最高风险相关仍存在争议。为了总结与ADE相关的CDI风险,我们回顾了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统数据库中与ADE相关的CDI报告,并进行了不成比例分析,以检测抗菌药物CDI的不良反应(ADR)信号。共识别出8063份与ADE相关的CDI报告,涉及73种抗菌药物。甲硝唑报告数量最多,其次是万古霉素、环丙沙星、克林霉素和阿莫西林。在不成比例分析中,甲硝唑的ADR阳性信号强度最高,其次是万古霉素、头孢泊肟、厄他培南和克林霉素。在这73种抗菌药物中,58种显示至少一个阳性ADR信号,头孢曲松是阳性信号总数最高的药物。我们的研究从药物警戒角度提供了AED的CDI风险的真实情况概述,并通过整合其正负信号分布显示了不同抗菌药物的风险特征。同时,我们的研究表明,甲硝唑和万古霉素的CDI风险可能被低估,值得进一步关注和调查。

相似文献

1
Real-World Data in Pharmacovigilance Database Provides a New Perspective for Understanding the Risk of Infection Associated with Antibacterial Drug Exposure.药物警戒数据库中的真实世界数据为理解抗菌药物暴露相关感染风险提供了新视角。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;12(7):1109. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071109.
2
Assessing the risk of tumor lysis syndrome associated with the use of antineoplastic agents: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.评估使用抗肿瘤药物相关的肿瘤溶解综合征风险:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Sep 6;15:20420986241274909. doi: 10.1177/20420986241274909. eCollection 2024.
3
Drug-induced QT prolongation and torsade de pointes: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.药物诱导的QT间期延长和尖端扭转型室性心动过速:一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1259611. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1259611. eCollection 2023.
4
Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.药物性急性胰腺炎:基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Mar;115(3):535-544. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3139. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
5
A Quantitative Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reports with Oral Bisphosphonates and Clostridium difficile.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于口服双膦酸盐与艰难梭菌不良事件报告的定量分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1095-1101. doi: 10.1002/phar.1832. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
6
Diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染的诊断与治疗。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1216-23; quiz e73. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
7
Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized adults and the first isolation of C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 in central China.中国中部地区住院成人艰难梭菌感染的流行病学和艰难梭菌 PCR 核糖型 027 的首次分离。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3841-6.
8
A Pharmacovigilance Study Regarding the Risk of Antibiotic-Associated Infection Based on Reports from the EudraVigilance Database: Analysis of Some of the Most Used Antibiotics in Intensive Care Units.一项基于欧洲药物警戒数据库报告的关于抗生素相关感染风险的药物警戒研究:对重症监护病房中一些最常用抗生素的分析。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;16(11):1585. doi: 10.3390/ph16111585.
9
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs: A real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.药物所致严重皮肤不良反应:一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 4;14:1117391. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1117391. eCollection 2023.
10
Antibiotic susceptibility of Clostridium difficile is similar worldwide over two decades despite widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics: an analysis done at the University Hospital of Zurich.尽管广谱抗生素广泛使用,但二十多年来全球艰难梭菌的抗生素敏感性相似:苏黎世大学医院的一项分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 26;14:607. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0607-z.

引用本文的文献

1
An in-depth exploration of the association between olanzapine, quetiapine and acute pancreatitis based on real-world datasets and network toxicology analysis.基于真实世界数据集和网络毒理学分析对奥氮平、喹硫平与急性胰腺炎之间关联的深入探究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 2;16:1529416. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1529416. eCollection 2025.
2
Drug-induced heart failure: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system database.药物性心力衰竭:一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1523136. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1523136. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs: A real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.药物所致严重皮肤不良反应:一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 4;14:1117391. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1117391. eCollection 2023.
2
Association between proton pump inhibitors and rhabdomyolysis risk: a post-marketing surveillance using FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.质子泵抑制剂与横纹肌溶解风险之间的关联:一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的上市后监测。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Feb 27;14:20420986231154075. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154075. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the risk of tumor lysis syndrome associated with the use of antineoplastic agents: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.
评估使用抗肿瘤药物相关的肿瘤溶解综合征风险:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Sep 6;15:20420986241274909. doi: 10.1177/20420986241274909. eCollection 2024.
4
Pharmacovigilance Strategies to Address Resistance to Antibiotics and Inappropriate Use-A Narrative Review.应对抗生素耐药性和不当使用的药物警戒策略——一篇叙述性综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 16;13(5):457. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13050457.
5
Drug-induced QT prolongation and torsade de pointes: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.药物诱导的QT间期延长和尖端扭转型室性心动过速:一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1259611. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1259611. eCollection 2023.
6
A Pharmacovigilance Study Regarding the Risk of Antibiotic-Associated Infection Based on Reports from the EudraVigilance Database: Analysis of Some of the Most Used Antibiotics in Intensive Care Units.一项基于欧洲药物警戒数据库报告的关于抗生素相关感染风险的药物警戒研究:对重症监护病房中一些最常用抗生素的分析。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;16(11):1585. doi: 10.3390/ph16111585.
Electrolyte Disorders Associated with Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FAERS Database.
与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦相关的电解质紊乱:一项使用FAERS数据库的药物警戒研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;12(2):240. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020240.
4
Differences in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.碘对比剂过敏反应的差异:美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 May;11(5):1494-1502.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.027. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
5
Ocular adverse events associated with anti-VEGF therapy: A pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).与抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗相关的眼部不良事件:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的药物警戒研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 18;13:1017889. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1017889. eCollection 2022.
6
Sustained reductions in unnecessary antimicrobial administration and hospital rates via stewardship in a nonacademic setting.通过在非学术环境中实施管理措施,持续降低不必要的抗菌药物使用和住院率。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):491-493. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.490. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
7
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会:成人艰难梭菌感染治疗指南的 2021 年更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27 Suppl 2:S1-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.贝伐珠单抗与胃肠道穿孔:来自 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的综述。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;54(10):1290-1297. doi: 10.1111/apt.16601. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Existence of Notoriety Bias in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database and Its Impact on Signal Strength.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库中存在的知名度偏差及其对信号强度的影响。
Hosp Pharm. 2021 Jun;56(3):152-158. doi: 10.1177/0018578719882323. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections.ACG 临床指南:艰难梭菌感染的预防、诊断和治疗。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1124-1147. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278.