• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌的机器人根治性子宫切除术:当前趋势与争议

Robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: current trends and controversies.

作者信息

Kim Jeeyeon, Chang Ha Kyun, Paek Jiheum, Park Hyeon Ji, Moon Hye Yeon

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, The College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2024 Aug 13;15(16):5134-5139. doi: 10.7150/jca.99705. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7150/jca.99705
PMID:39247605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11375555/
Abstract

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) is widely performed as a treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. However, in 2018, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) called the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial showed that MIRH had poorer oncologic outcomes compared to laparotomy. Since then, several clinical studies have supported this finding, and most surgeons now perform MIRH with limited surgical indications. However, most of the reported studies evaluated laparoscopic radical hysterectomy rather than robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH). Robotic surgery has advantages for complex surgical procedures in the deep and narrow pelvic cavity in cervical cancer, making it necessary to evaluate the benefits and potential harms of RRH individually. Based on this systematic review, RRH is a safe and effective alternative to abdominal approach for early-stage cervical cancer. RRH offers significant perioperative benefits, including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications, without compromising oncologic outcomes such as overall survival and progression-free survival. Additionally, surgeons should aim to minimize tumor cell spillage into the peritoneal cavity by eliminating the use of uterine manipulators or vaginal colpotomy. Ongoing RCTs will reveal whether we can perform RRH without oncologic compromise in cervical cancer.

摘要

微创根治性子宫切除术(MIRH)作为早期宫颈癌的一种治疗方法被广泛应用。然而,2018年一项名为“腹腔镜治疗宫颈癌(LACC)试验”的随机对照试验表明,与剖腹手术相比,MIRH的肿瘤学结局较差。从那时起,多项临床研究支持了这一发现,现在大多数外科医生在手术指征有限的情况下进行MIRH。然而,大多数已报道的研究评估的是腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术,而非机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术(RRH)。机器人手术在宫颈癌深而狭窄的盆腔中进行复杂手术时具有优势,因此有必要单独评估RRH的益处和潜在危害。基于这项系统评价,RRH是早期宫颈癌腹部手术的一种安全有效的替代方法。RRH在围手术期具有显著益处,包括减少失血、缩短住院时间和减少并发症,而不影响总体生存和无进展生存等肿瘤学结局。此外,外科医生应通过避免使用子宫操纵器或阴道切开术,尽量减少肿瘤细胞溢入腹腔。正在进行的随机对照试验将揭示我们是否能够在不影响宫颈癌肿瘤学结局的情况下进行RRH。

相似文献

1
Robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: current trends and controversies.宫颈癌的机器人根治性子宫切除术:当前趋势与争议
J Cancer. 2024 Aug 13;15(16):5134-5139. doi: 10.7150/jca.99705. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.中国老年宫颈癌患者机器人根治性子宫切除术与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的疗效和安全性结果比较
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 1;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0544-x.
3
Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术:正确的手术方式。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治性B型和C型子宫切除术的比较:长期结果
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 23;88(3):289-296. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i3.6100.
6
Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.新辅助化疗后腹腔镜与机器人根治性子宫切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌:病例对照研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
7
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.经阴道子宫切除术的剖腹根治性子宫切除术与微创根治性子宫切除术治疗 IB1 期至 IIA2 期宫颈癌:生存结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 25;101(8):e28911. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028911.
8
Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.机器人根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌:美国的一项基于人群的采用和术后即刻结局研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Mar-Apr;26(3):551-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.新辅助化疗后局部晚期宫颈癌患者的机器人辅助与开放性根治性子宫切除术:单机构手术及肿瘤学结局经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):909-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 5.
10
Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后,机器人手术与腹腔镜手术及开腹手术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的外科手术及肿瘤学结局比较
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Mar;26(3):539-46. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000646.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of recurrence in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer: Comparison between minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy.FIGO 分期 IB1-IB2 期宫颈癌的复发模式:微创与经腹广泛子宫切除术的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;49(11):107047. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107047. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
2
Spillage and displacement of indocyanine green-stained tissues from uterine cervix to pelvic peritoneum: A proof of concept study for colpotomy approach in minimally invasive surgery.宫颈组织中吲哚菁绿染色的溢漏和移位至盆腔腹膜:经阴道切开术在微创手术中的概念验证研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;62(1):119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.08.016.
3
Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.经阴道宫颈癌隐匿式免视免触技术在早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术中的应用:一种新的手术技术。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 May;34(3):e27. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e27. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.微创根治性子宫切除术与避免早期宫颈癌癌细胞播散的重要性:一篇叙述性综述。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jan;34(1):e5. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e5. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期宫颈癌行微创根治性子宫切除术且不使用子宫操纵器的生存情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(2):176-183. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17339. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
6
The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.MEMORY 研究:早期宫颈癌微创根治性手术与开放性根治性子宫切除术的多中心研究:生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;166(3):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
7
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer: Should We Look beyond Squamous Cell Carcinoma?宫颈癌的微创手术:我们是否应该超越鳞状细胞癌?
J Invest Surg. 2022 Jul;35(7):1602-1603. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2075495. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.腹腔镜或机器人根治性手术中使用内镜吻合器抑制宫颈恶性肿瘤肿瘤播散的安全性和有效性研究(SOLUTION):一项多中心、开放标签、单臂、Ⅱ期试验方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09429-z.
9
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Early Discharge within 12 Hours after Robotic Radical Hysterectomy.机器人根治性子宫切除术后12小时内早期出院的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 20;11(4):1122. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041122.
10
Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术:正确的手术方式。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15.