Sileci Audrey C B, Cioffi Camille C, Trevino Shaina, Fernandes Llewellyn, Capron Christopher G, Mauricio Anne Marie
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Counseling Psychology Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2024 Sep 9:333549241271720. doi: 10.1177/00333549241271720.
Integrating vaccination services with other essential health services could increase vaccination rates among socially marginalized populations. We examined the associations between colocation of vaccines at syringe service programs and COVID-19 vaccination status among people who inject drugs and people experiencing houselessness.
This study included 1891 participants aged ≥18 years at 9 sites in Oregon from July 2021 through March 2022. Participants self-reported whether they had ever received ≥1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. We calculated site-level COVID-19 vaccine availability and overall vaccination rates. We compared site-level vaccination rates and analyzed the association between vaccine availability and vaccination status.
We found no significant difference in vaccination rates between sites that did and did not offer COVID-19 vaccines ( = -0.33; = .75). We also found no significant association between vaccine availability and vaccination status. However, the odds of having received a COVID-19 vaccine were 2.79 times higher for each additional site visit during which COVID-19 vaccines were available (odds ratio [OR] = 2.79; 95% CI, 2.18-3.58; < .001). The association between vaccine availability and vaccine status was not moderated by participant age (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.07; = .13) or housing instability (OR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.13-2.60; = .48).
Colocating COVID-19 vaccines at syringe service programs was only positively associated with vaccination status if vaccines were offered frequently on-site. Future work should examine whether the frequency of offering vaccination services increases willingness to engage in vaccination and examine trust and convenience as potential mechanisms.
将疫苗接种服务与其他基本卫生服务相结合,可能会提高社会边缘化人群的疫苗接种率。我们研究了在注射器服务项目中疫苗的 colocations 与注射毒品者和无家可归者的 COVID-19 疫苗接种状况之间的关联。
本研究纳入了 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月期间俄勒冈州 9 个地点的 1891 名年龄≥18 岁的参与者。参与者自我报告他们是否曾接种过≥1 剂 COVID-19 疫苗。我们计算了各地点 COVID-19 疫苗的可及性和总体疫苗接种率。我们比较了各地点的疫苗接种率,并分析了疫苗可及性与接种状况之间的关联。
我们发现提供和未提供 COVID-19 疫苗的地点之间的疫苗接种率没有显著差异(= -0.33;= 0.75)。我们还发现疫苗可及性与接种状况之间没有显著关联。然而,在有 COVID-19 疫苗的情况下,每增加一次就诊,接种 COVID-19 疫苗的几率就高出 2.79 倍(优势比 [OR] = 2.79;95%置信区间,2.18 - 3.58;< 0.001)。疫苗可及性与疫苗接种状况之间的关联不受参与者年龄(OR = 1.03;95%置信区间,0.99 - 1.07;= 0.13)或住房不稳定状况(OR = 0.59;95%置信区间,0.13 - 2.60;= 0.48)的影响。
仅当在注射器服务项目现场频繁提供 COVID-19 疫苗时,将其 colocating 才与接种状况呈正相关。未来的工作应研究提供疫苗接种服务的频率是否会增加参与接种的意愿,并研究信任和便利性作为潜在机制的情况。 (注:“colocations”这个词在医学语境中不太常见,可能是个生僻词或拼写有误,这里直接保留英文未翻译)