BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
Department of Cardiology Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel) Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Brussels Belgium.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e032571. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032571. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
Patients with osteoporosis demonstrate increased vascular calcification but the effect of osteoporosis treatments on vascular calcification remains unclear. The present study aimed to examine whether coronary or aortic calcification are influenced by denosumab and alendronic acid treatment.
In a double-blind randomized controlled SALTIRE2 (Study Investigating the Effect of Drugs Used to Treat Osteoporosis on the Progression of Calcific Aortic Stenosis) trial, patients with aortic stenosis were randomized 2:1:2:1 to denosumab, placebo injection, alendronic acid, or placebo capsule. Participants underwent serial imaging with computed tomography and 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography for the assessment of vascular calcium burden and calcification activity, respectively. We report the prespecified secondary analyses of 24-month change in coronary calcium score, and 12-month changes in thoracic aorta calcium score, coronary and aortic 18F-sodium fluoride activity. One hundred fifty patients with aortic stenosis (72±8 years; 21% female) were randomized to denosumab (n=49), alendronic acid (n=51), and placebo (injection n=25, capsule n=25). There were no differences in change in coronary calcium scores between placebo (16 [-64 to 148] Agatston units) and either denosumab (94 [0-212] Agatston units, =0.24) or alendronic acid (34 [-62 to 134], =0.99). There were no differences in change in thoracic aorta calcium scores between placebo (132 [22-512] Agatston units) and either denosumab (118 [11-340], =0.75) or alendronic acid (116 [26-498] Agatston units, =0.62). There were no differences in changes in coronary or aortic 18F-sodium fluoride activity between treatment groups.
Neither alendronic acid nor denosumab are associated with changes in the activity or progression of coronary or aortic calcification. Osteoporosis treatments do not appear to have major impact on vascular calcification of atherosclerosis.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02132026.
骨质疏松症患者表现出血管钙化增加,但骨质疏松症治疗对血管钙化的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨地舒单抗和阿仑膦酸钠治疗是否会影响冠状动脉或主动脉钙化。
在一项双盲随机对照 SALTIRE2(研究药物治疗骨质疏松症对进展性钙化性主动脉狭窄的影响)试验中,主动脉瓣狭窄患者按 2:1:2:1 的比例随机分为地舒单抗组、安慰剂注射组、阿仑膦酸钠组和安慰剂胶囊组。参与者分别接受了计算机断层扫描和 18F-氟化钠正电子发射断层扫描,以评估血管钙负荷和钙化活性。我们报告了预先指定的次要分析,即 24 个月时冠状动脉钙评分的变化,以及 12 个月时胸主动脉钙评分、冠状动脉和主动脉 18F-氟化钠活性的变化。150 例主动脉瓣狭窄患者(72±8 岁;21%为女性)被随机分为地舒单抗组(n=49)、阿仑膦酸钠组(n=51)和安慰剂组(注射剂 n=25,胶囊 n=25)。安慰剂组(64 至 148 个阿加斯顿单位)和地舒单抗组(94 至 212 个阿加斯顿单位,=0.24)或阿仑膦酸钠组(62 至 134 个阿加斯顿单位,=0.99)的冠状动脉钙评分变化无差异。安慰剂组(22 至 512 个阿加斯顿单位)和地舒单抗组(118 至 340 个阿加斯顿单位,=0.75)或阿仑膦酸钠组(116 至 498 个阿加斯顿单位,=0.62)的胸主动脉钙评分变化无差异。各组间冠状动脉或主动脉 18F-氟化钠活性的变化无差异。
阿仑膦酸钠和地舒单抗均与冠状动脉或主动脉钙化的活性或进展变化无关。骨质疏松症的治疗似乎对动脉粥样硬化的血管钙化没有重大影响。