British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Jun;29(3):1372-1385. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02458-w. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Standard methods for quantifying positron emission tomography (PET) uptake in the aorta are time consuming and may not reflect overall vessel activity. We describe aortic microcalcification activity (AMA), a novel method for quantifying F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) uptake in the thoracic aorta.
Twenty patients underwent two hybrid F-NaF PET and computed tomography (CT) scans of the thoracic aorta less than three weeks apart. AMA, as well as maximum (TBRmax) and mean (TBRmean) tissue to background ratios, were calculated by two trained operators. Intra-observer repeatability, inter-observer repeatability and scan-rescan reproducibility were assessed. Each F-NaF quantification method was compared to validated cardiovascular risk scores.
Aortic microcalcification activity demonstrated excellent intra-observer (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.98) and inter-observer (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97) repeatability with very good scan-rescan reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.86) which were similar to previously described TBRmean and TBRmax methods. AMA analysis was much quicker to perform than standard TBR assessment (3.4min versus 15.1min, P<0.0001). AMA was correlated with Framingham stroke risk scores and Framingham risk score for hard cononary heart disease.
AMA is a simple, rapid and reproducible method of quantifying global F-NaF uptake across the ascending aorta and aortic arch that correlates with cardiovascular risk scores.
定量正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在主动脉中的摄取的标准方法既耗时又可能无法反映整体血管活性。我们描述了一种新的方法,用于量化胸主动脉中的氟-18 钠(18F-NaF)摄取,即主动脉微钙化活性(AMA)。
20 例患者在不到三周的时间内接受了两次 F-NaF 正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描。两名训练有素的操作人员计算了 AMA 以及最大(TBRmax)和平均(TBRmean)组织与背景比。评估了观察者内重复性、观察者间重复性和扫描-再扫描可重复性。每种 F-NaF 定量方法均与经过验证的心血管风险评分进行了比较。
主动脉微钙化活性显示出极好的观察者内(组内相关系数 0.98)和观察者间(组内相关系数 0.97)重复性,扫描-再扫描可重复性也非常好(组内相关系数 0.86),与之前描述的 TBRmean 和 TBRmax 方法相似。与标准 TBR 评估相比,AMA 分析的速度更快(3.4 分钟对 15.1 分钟,P<0.0001)。AMA 与 Framingham 中风风险评分和 Framingham 硬冠状动脉心脏病风险评分相关。
AMA 是一种简单、快速且可重复的方法,可定量评估升主动脉和主动脉弓的 F-NaF 整体摄取,并与心血管风险评分相关。