• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每半年一次使用德佩莫单抗治疗嗜酸性粒细胞型重度哮喘。

Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma with an Eosinophilic Phenotype.

作者信息

Jackson David J, Wechsler Michael E, Jackson Daniel J, Bernstein David, Korn Stephanie, Pfeffer Paul E, Chen Ruchong, Saito Junpei, de Luíz Martinez Gustavo, Dymek Lucyna, Jacques Loretta, Bird Nicholas, Schalkwijk Stein, Smith Douglas, Howarth Peter, Pavord Ian D

机构信息

From Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London (David J. Jackson), Barts Health NHS Trust (P.E.P.), and GSK (L.J., N.B., S.S., P.H.), London, and the Oxford Respiratory NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford (I.D.P.) - all in the United Kingdom; National Jewish Health, Denver (M.E.W.); the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison (Daniel J. Jackson); the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Bernstein Clinical Research Center, Cincinnati (D.B.); Clinical Research Center, Respiratory Medicine, IKF Pneumologie Mainz, Mainz, and Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg - both in Germany (S.K.); State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Joint International Research Laboratory of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China (R.C.); Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan (J.S.); Hospital Vithas Xanit Internacional, Málaga, Spain (G.L.M.); Centrum Medyczne Lucyna Andrzej Dymek, Strzelce Opolskie, Poland (L.D.); and GSK, Collegeville, PA (D.S.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2024 Dec 19;391(24):2337-2349. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2406673. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2406673
PMID:39248309
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depemokimab is an ultra-long-acting biologic therapy with enhanced binding affinity for interleukin-5 that may enable effective 6-month dosing intervals.

METHODS

In these phase 3A, randomized, placebo-controlled replicate trials, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of depemokimab in patients with severe asthma and an eosinophilic phenotype characterized by a high eosinophil count (≥300 cells per microliter in the previous 12 months or ≥150 cells per microliter at screening) and a history of exacerbations despite the receipt of medium- or high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either depemokimab (at a dose of 100 mg subcutaneously) or placebo at weeks 0 and 26, plus standard care. The primary end point was the annualized rate of exacerbations at 52 weeks. Secondary end points, which were analyzed in a hierarchical manner to adjust for multiplicity, included the change from baseline in the score on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and asthma symptom reports at 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Across the two trials, 792 patients underwent randomization and 762 were included in the full analysis; 502 were assigned to receive depemokimab and 260 to receive placebo. The annualized rate of exacerbations was 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.36 to 0.58) with depemokimab and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.43) with placebo (rate ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001) in SWIFT-1 and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70) with depemokimab and 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.41) with placebo (rate ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.73; P<0.001) in SWIFT-2. No significant between-group difference in the change from baseline in the SGRQ score was observed in either trial, so no statistical inference was drawn on subsequent secondary end points. The proportion of patients with any adverse event was similar in the two groups in both trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Depemokimab reduced the annualized rate of exacerbations among patients with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. (Funded by GSK; SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04719832 and NCT04718103.).

摘要

背景

地培莫单抗是一种超长效生物疗法,对白细胞介素-5具有增强的结合亲和力,这可能使每6个月给药一次成为有效给药间隔。

方法

在这些3A期随机、安慰剂对照重复试验中,我们评估了地培莫单抗对重度哮喘且具有嗜酸性粒细胞表型患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者的特征为嗜酸性粒细胞计数高(在之前12个月内≥300个细胞/微升或筛查时≥150个细胞/微升)且尽管接受了中或高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗仍有急性加重病史。患者按2:1的比例随机分组,在第0周和第26周接受地培莫单抗(皮下注射剂量为100 mg)或安慰剂治疗,同时接受标准治疗。主要终点是52周时的年化急性加重率。次要终点以分层方式进行分析以调整多重性,包括圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分相对于基线的变化、第1秒用力呼气量以及52周时的哮喘症状报告。

结果

在两项试验中,792例患者进行了随机分组,762例纳入全分析;502例被分配接受地培莫单抗治疗,260例接受安慰剂治疗。在SWIFT - 1试验中,地培莫单抗组的年化急性加重率为0.46(95%置信区间[CI],0.36至0.58),安慰剂组为1.11(95%CI,0.86至1.43)(率比为0.42;95%CI,0.30至0.59;P<0.001);在SWIFT - 2试验中,地培莫单抗组为0.56(95%CI,0.44至0.70),安慰剂组为1.08(95%CI,0.83至1.41)(率比为0.52;95%CI,0.36至0.73;P<0.001)。在两项试验中,两组间SGRQ评分相对于基线的变化均未观察到显著差异,因此未对后续次要终点进行统计推断。在两项试验中,两组中发生任何不良事件的患者比例相似。

结论

地培莫单抗降低了具有嗜酸性粒细胞表型的重度哮喘患者的年化急性加重率。(由葛兰素史克公司资助;SWIFT - 1和SWIFT - 2的ClinicalTrials.gov编号分别为NCT04719832和NCT04718103。)

相似文献

1
Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Severe Asthma with an Eosinophilic Phenotype.每半年一次使用德佩莫单抗治疗嗜酸性粒细胞型重度哮喘。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Dec 19;391(24):2337-2349. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2406673. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.美泊利珠单抗治疗严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1198-207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403290. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
3
Mepolizumab to Prevent Exacerbations of COPD with an Eosinophilic Phenotype.美泊利单抗预防嗜酸性粒细胞型慢性阻塞性肺疾病的急性加重
N Engl J Med. 2025 May 1;392(17):1710-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2413181.
4
Effect of fixed-dose subcutaneous reslizumab on asthma exacerbations in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma and corticosteroid sparing in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma: results from two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.固定剂量皮下注射瑞利珠单抗对重度未控制哮喘患者哮喘恶化的影响和对口服糖皮质激素依赖哮喘患者糖皮质激素节省作用的影响:两项 3 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):461-474. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30372-8. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in Japanese patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.美泊利珠单抗在日本重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。
Allergol Int. 2017 Jul;66(3):445-451. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.11.006. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
6
Onset of effect and impact on health-related quality of life, exacerbation rate, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (ANDHI): a randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial.贝那鲁肽治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的疗效发作和对健康相关生活质量的影响、恶化率、肺功能和鼻息肉症状:一项随机、对照、3b 期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Mar;9(3):260-274. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30414-8. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
7
Benralizumab for patients with mild to moderate, persistent asthma (BISE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.贝那鲁肽治疗轻中度持续性哮喘患者(BISE):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Jul;5(7):568-576. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30190-X. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Dupilumab in Children with Uncontrolled Moderate-to-Severe Asthma.度普利尤单抗治疗未控制的中重度哮喘患儿。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):2230-2240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2106567.
9
Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite use of medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase 2b dose-ranging trial.度普利尤单抗在吸入中至高剂量皮质类固醇激素联合长效β2 激动剂治疗控制不佳的持续性哮喘成人患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 2b 期关键剂量范围研究。
Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):31-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30307-5. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Efficacy of mepolizumab add-on therapy on health-related quality of life and markers of asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma (MUSCA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3b trial.美泊利珠单抗附加疗法对严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘(MUSCA)患者健康相关生活质量和哮喘控制标志物的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、多中心、3b 期临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):390-400. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30125-X. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Established and Emerging Asthma Biomarkers with a Focus on Biologic Trials: A Narrative Review.以生物制剂试验为重点的已确立和新兴哮喘生物标志物:叙述性综述
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):370. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080370.
2
Degree of Adherence to Recommendations From the Spanish Consensus on the Reduction of Oral Corticosteroid Use in Asthma Patients: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study.哮喘患者减少口服糖皮质激素使用的西班牙共识建议的依从程度:一项基于问卷的观察性研究。
Open Respir Arch. 2025 Jun 9;7(3):100452. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100452. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
3
Targeted Biologic Therapies in Severe Asthma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications.
重度哮喘的靶向生物疗法:作用机制、生物标志物及临床应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;18(7):1021. doi: 10.3390/ph18071021.
4
The immunology of asthma.哮喘的免疫学
Nat Immunol. 2025 Aug;26(8):1233-1245. doi: 10.1038/s41590-025-02212-9. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
5
Inflammation in Asthma: Mechanistic Insights and the Role of Biologics in Therapeutic Frontiers.哮喘中的炎症:机制洞察与生物制剂在治疗前沿的作用
Biomedicines. 2025 May 30;13(6):1342. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061342.
6
Hypereosinophilia: clinical and therapeutic approach in 2025.高嗜酸性粒细胞增多症:2025年的临床与治疗方法
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Aug 1;25(4):258-268. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000001078. Epub 2025 May 21.
7
Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma: Current Insights and Future Directions.重症哮喘的生物疗法:当前见解与未来方向
J Clin Med. 2025 May 2;14(9):3153. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093153.
8
Clinical correlations with unmet social needs in critically ill children with asthma.患有哮喘的危重症儿童未满足的社会需求与临床的相关性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 Mar 31;4(3):100466. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100466. eCollection 2025 Aug.
9
Evaluation of Long-Term Response to Biological Therapy in Severe Asthma and Considerations for Treatment Adjustment.重度哮喘生物治疗的长期疗效评估及治疗调整考量
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 11;14(8):2623. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082623.
10
Depemokimab in eosinophilic asthma - a new era in biological therapy?德佩莫单抗治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘——生物治疗的新时代?
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 28;31(1):42. eCollection 2025.