Parish Jonathan, Monk Steve H, O'Brien Matthew, Hani Ummey, Coric Domagoj, Holland Christopher M
Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC.
SpineFirst, Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 1;38(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001691. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
Cervical disc arthroplasty is a well-established alternative to anterior cervical fusion but requires precise placement for optimal outcomes. We present the case of a 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty with suboptimal implantation of the interbody devices, requiring revision corpectomy. Supplemental video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 ( http://links.lww.com/CLINSPINE/A358 ) content of the revision surgery is also provided. This report highlights the importance of proper implant sizing and position and reviews the nuances of surgical revision.
A retrospective review of the clinical and radiographic data was performed from prior to the index operation through the 3-month postoperative period after the surgical revision.
The patient presented approximately 2 years post-cervical arthroplasty with increasing neck pain and early cervical myelopathy. An imaging workup revealed severe cervical stenosis at the caudal level with cord compression and concern for device failure. Intraoperatively, the core of the caudal device was found to have ejected into the spinal canal. A cervical corpectomy of the intervening vertebra with the removal of both devices was performed. The patient had a complete neurologic recovery.
Although failure of a cervical disc arthroplasty device is rare, the likelihood can be significantly increased with poor sizing (over or under sizing), asymmetric placement, endplate violation, or poor patient selection. In the case presented herein, early device failure was unrecognized, and the patient went on to develop progressive cervical myelopathy requiring revision corpectomy.
颈椎间盘置换术是一种成熟的颈椎前路融合术替代方法,但需要精确放置以获得最佳效果。我们报告一例两节段颈椎间盘置换术,椎间融合器植入不理想,需要行翻修椎体次全切除术。还提供了补充视频,补充数字内容1(http://links.lww.com/CLINSPINE/A358),即翻修手术的内容。本报告强调了合适的植入物尺寸和位置的重要性,并回顾了手术翻修的细微差别。
对索引手术前至手术翻修后3个月的临床和影像学数据进行回顾性分析。
患者在颈椎间盘置换术后约2年出现颈部疼痛加重和早期颈椎脊髓病。影像学检查显示尾端严重颈椎管狭窄伴脊髓受压,怀疑器械故障。术中发现尾端器械的核心已突入椎管。对中间椎体进行颈椎椎体次全切除术,并取出两个器械。患者神经功能完全恢复。
虽然颈椎间盘置换术器械失败很少见,但尺寸不合适(过大或过小)、不对称放置、终板损伤或患者选择不当会显著增加其发生的可能性。在本文所述病例中,早期器械故障未被识别,患者继而发展为进行性颈椎脊髓病,需要行翻修椎体次全切除术。