Tunnicliffe David J, Palmer Suetonia C, Cashmore Brydee A, Saglimbene Valeria M, Krishnasamy Rathika, Lambert Kelly, Johnson David W, Craig Jonathan C, Strippoli Giovanni Fm
Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 29;11(11):CD007784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007784.pub3.
Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in people with early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is similar to people with coronary artery disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014, which included 50 studies (45,285 participants).
To evaluate the benefits and harms of statins compared with placebo, no treatment, standard care or another statin in adults with CKD not requiring dialysis.
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 4 October 2023. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. An updated search will be undertaken every three months.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or other statins, on death, cardiovascular events, kidney function, toxicity, and lipid levels in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 90 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m) were included.
Two or more authors independently extracted data and assessed the study risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous benefits and harms with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
We included 63 studies (50,725 randomised participants); of these, 53 studies (42,752 participants) compared statins with placebo or no treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range 2 to 64.8 months), the median dosage of statin was equivalent to 20 mg/day of simvastatin, and participants had a median eGFR of 55 mL/min/1.73 m. Ten studies (7973 participants) compared two different statin regimens. We were able to meta-analyse 43 studies (41,273 participants). Most studies had limited reporting and hence exhibited unclear risk of bias in most domains. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statins prevent major cardiovascular events (14 studies, 36,156 participants: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79; I = 39%; high certainty evidence), death (13 studies, 34,978 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96; I² = 53%; high certainty evidence), cardiovascular death (8 studies, 19,112 participants: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.87; I² = 0%; high certainty evidence) and myocardial infarction (10 studies, 9475 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). There were too few events to determine if statins made a difference in hospitalisation due to heart failure. Statins probably make little or no difference to stroke (7 studies, 9115 participants: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.08; I² = 39%; moderate certainty evidence) and kidney failure (3 studies, 6704 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.05; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. Potential harms from statins were limited by a lack of systematic reporting. Statins compared to placebo may have little or no effect on elevated liver enzymes (7 studies, 7991 participants: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), withdrawal due to adverse events (13 studies, 4219 participants: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.60; I² = 37%; low certainty evidence), and cancer (2 studies, 5581 participants: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). However, few studies reported rhabdomyolysis or elevated creatinine kinase; hence, we are unable to determine the effect due to very low certainty evidence. Statins reduce the risk of death, major cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction in people with CKD who did not have cardiovascular disease at baseline (primary prevention). There was insufficient data to determine the benefits and harms of the type of statin therapy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Statins reduce death and major cardiovascular events by about 20% and probably make no difference to stroke or kidney failure in people with CKD not requiring dialysis. However, due to limited reporting, the effect of statins on elevated creatinine kinase or rhabdomyolysis is unclear. Statins have an important role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and death in people who have CKD and do not require dialysis. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. We will search for new evidence every three months and update the review when we identify relevant new evidence. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.
心血管疾病是慢性肾脏病(CKD)早期患者最常见的死亡原因,心血管事件的绝对风险与冠状动脉疾病患者相似。这是一篇综述的更新版本,该综述首次发表于2009年,并于2014年更新,纳入了50项研究(45285名参与者)。
评估他汀类药物与安慰剂、不治疗、标准治疗或另一种他汀类药物相比,对非透析成年CKD患者的益处和危害。
我们检索了截至2023年10月4日的Cochrane肾脏与移植研究注册库。注册库中的研究通过检索CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、会议论文集、国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)搜索门户和ClinicalTrials.gov来识别。每三个月将进行一次更新检索。
纳入比较他汀类药物与安慰剂、不治疗、标准治疗或其他他汀类药物对CKD成年患者(估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)90至15 mL/min/1.73 m²)的死亡、心血管事件、肾功能、毒性和血脂水平影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验。
两名或更多作者独立提取数据并评估研究的偏倚风险。治疗效果以连续结局的平均差(MD)和二分法益处与危害的风险比(RR)表示,并带有95%置信区间(CI)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了63项研究(50725名随机参与者);其中,53项研究(42752名参与者)比较了他汀类药物与安慰剂或不治疗。中位随访时间为12个月(范围2至64.8个月),他汀类药物的中位剂量相当于辛伐他汀20 mg/天,参与者的中位eGFR为55 mL/min/1.73 m²。10项研究(7973名参与者)比较了两种不同的他汀类药物治疗方案。我们能够对43项研究(41273名参与者)进行荟萃分析。大多数研究报告有限,因此在大多数领域表现出不明确的偏倚风险。与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,他汀类药物可预防主要心血管事件(14项研究,36156名参与者:RR 0.72,95%CI为0.66至0.79;I² = 39%;高确定性证据)、死亡(13项研究,34978名参与者:RR 0.83,95%CI为0.73至0.96;I² = 53%;高确定性证据)、心血管死亡(8项研究,19112名参与者:RR 0.77,95%CI为0.69至0.87;I² = 0%;高确定性证据)和心肌梗死(10项研究,9475名参与者:RR 0.55,95%CI为0.42至0.73;I² = 0%;中度确定性证据)。因心力衰竭住院的事件太少,无法确定他汀类药物是否有影响。他汀类药物可能对CKD非透析患者的中风(7项研究,9115名参与者:RR 0.64,95%CI为0.37至1.08;I² = 39%;中度确定性证据)和肾衰竭(3项研究,6704名参与者:RR 0.98,95%CI为0.91至1.05;I² = 0%;中度确定性证据)影响很小或无影响。由于缺乏系统报告,他汀类药物的潜在危害有限。与安慰剂相比,他汀类药物可能对肝酶升高(7项研究,7991名参与者:RR 0.76,95%CI为0.39至1.50;I² = 0%;低确定性证据)、因不良事件停药(13项研究,4219名参与者:RR 1.16,95%CI为0.84至1.60;I² = 37%;低确定性证据)和癌症(2项研究,5581名参与者:RR 1.03,95%CI为0.82至1.30;I² = 0%;低确定性证据)影响很小或无影响。然而,很少有研究报告横纹肌溶解或肌酐激酶升高;因此,由于证据确定性极低,我们无法确定其影响。他汀类药物可降低基线时无心血管疾病的CKD患者(一级预防)的死亡、主要心血管事件和心肌梗死风险。确定他汀类药物治疗类型的益处和危害的数据不足。
他汀类药物可降低约20%的死亡和主要心血管事件风险,对CKD非透析患者的中风或肾衰竭可能无影响。然而,由于报告有限,他汀类药物对肌酐激酶升高或横纹肌溶解的影响尚不清楚。他汀类药物在CKD非透析患者心血管事件和死亡的一级预防中具有重要作用。编辑说明:这是一篇动态系统评价。我们将每三个月搜索新证据,当识别到相关新证据时更新该评价。有关该评价的当前状态,请参考Cochrane系统评价数据库。