Patel Trisha N, Yang Runhan, Steyvers Mark, Benjamin Aaron S
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Sep 9. doi: 10.1037/xap0000518.
Attention fluctuates over time and is prone to fatigue. Thus, maintaining sustained attention is difficult. The goal of this article is to evaluate the metacognitive penetrability of attention by examining whether dynamic control over the pacing of an ongoing attention-demanding task helps individuals maintain attention. In Experiments 1 and 2, breaks were found to provide a small localized benefit in performance, but self-administered breaks were no more beneficial than ones imposed by the experimenter. Experiment 3 and 4 provided subjects full control over the onset of each trial. Subjects who self-paced stimuli now outperformed yoked controls who experienced the stimuli at a fixed rate and also those who experienced the exact same schedule as the self-pacing subjects. Experiment 5 replicated this set of findings and demonstrated that the benefit of self-pacing was diminished under dual-task conditions. Taken together, it appears that providing workers control over the pace of work allows them to coordinate the occurrence of cognitively demanding events with moments of heightened attention. However, the improvement in performance is subject to important boundary conditions on the parameters of control, does not diminish the vigilance decrement associated with fatigue, and is reduced under conditions in which attention is divided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
注意力会随时间波动,且容易疲劳。因此,保持持续注意力很困难。本文的目的是通过研究对一项持续的高要求注意力任务的节奏进行动态控制是否有助于个体保持注意力,来评估注意力的元认知渗透性。在实验1和实验2中,发现休息能在表现上带来微小的局部益处,但自我安排的休息并不比实验者安排的休息更有益。实验3和实验4让受试者完全控制每个试验的开始。自行控制刺激节奏的受试者现在的表现优于以固定速率接受刺激的被控制组受试者,也优于经历与自行控制节奏的受试者完全相同时间表的受试者。实验5重复了这一系列发现,并表明在双重任务条件下,自行控制节奏的益处会减弱。综合来看,似乎给予工作者对工作节奏的控制权能使他们将认知要求高的事件的发生与注意力增强的时刻相协调。然而,表现的提高受制于控制参数的重要边界条件,不会减少与疲劳相关的警觉性下降,并且在注意力分散的条件下会降低。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)