Fifolt Matthew, Allen Peg, Crenshaw Andrew, Erwin Paul C, Lang Britt, Thomas Amy Belflower, Brownson Ross C
Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Organization (Drs Fifolt and Erwin), School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Prevention Research Center (Dr Allen, Mr Crenshaw, and Dr Brownson), Department of Surgery, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center and Division of Public Health Sciences (Dr Brownson), Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; and Public Health Accreditation Board (Ms Lang and Ms Thomas), Alexandria, Virginia.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(2):183-189. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002062. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
This article focuses on 4 small local health departments (LHDs) that were in the process of seeking Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition using PHAB Standards & Measures Version 2022.
The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of 4 small LHDs related to Quality Improvement (QI) and Performance Management (PM) in their pursuit of PHAB reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition.
A team of researchers conducted 22 qualitative interviews with health department leaders and staff. Findings relative to QI/PM represent an embedded case study since they were part of a larger investigation.
The research team conducted interviews remotely with health departments located in the West and Midwest.
Participants included adults at least 18 years old and employed in 1 of 4 health departments.
Emergent themes from this qualitative investigation included using QI/PM tracking systems, building staff buy-in for QI/PM, integrating QI/PM into daily work, and advice for other health departments regarding QI/PM.
Participants suggested that tracking systems helped them manage QI/PM processes. Staff buy-in for QI/PM was strengthened by building a sense of ownership of the process and connecting improvement processes to outcomes. Health departments integrated QI/PM into daily work by leadership modeling and communicating expectations. Advice for other health departments included finding a QI system that was easy to follow and recognizing the role of QI/PM in improving performance to better support the wellbeing of the community.
QI/PM are important tools for health department effectiveness. Participants affirmed that the primary purposes of QI/PM are to enhance internal processes and improve community health outcomes. Study findings demonstrate how 4 small health departments integrated QI/PM into their public health practice.
本文聚焦于4个小型地方卫生部门(LHD),它们正在依据《2022年公共卫生认证委员会(PHAB)标准与措施》寻求PHAB再认证或途径认可。
本研究的目的是探讨4个小型LHD在追求PHAB再认证或途径认可过程中与质量改进(QI)和绩效管理(PM)相关的经验。
一组研究人员对卫生部门领导和工作人员进行了22次定性访谈。与QI/PM相关的研究结果代表了一个嵌入式案例研究,因为它们是一项更大规模调查的一部分。
研究团队通过远程方式对位于西部和中西部的卫生部门进行了访谈。
参与者包括至少18岁且受雇于4个卫生部门之一的成年人。
本次定性调查中出现的主题包括使用QI/PM跟踪系统、让工作人员支持QI/PM、将QI/PM融入日常工作以及就QI/PM向其他卫生部门提供的建议。
参与者表示,跟踪系统帮助他们管理QI/PM流程。通过建立对流程的主人翁意识并将改进流程与成果联系起来,增强了工作人员对QI/PM的支持。卫生部门通过领导示范和传达期望将QI/PM融入日常工作。给其他卫生部门的建议包括找到一个易于遵循的QI系统,并认识到QI/PM在提高绩效以更好地支持社区福祉方面的作用。
QI/PM是提高卫生部门效能的重要工具。参与者确认,QI/PM的主要目的是加强内部流程和改善社区健康成果。研究结果展示了4个小型卫生部门如何将QI/PM融入其公共卫生实践。