Allen Peg, Fifolt Matthew, Crenshaw Andrew N, Erwin Paul C, Lang Britt, Belflower Thomas Amy, Kuehnert Paul, Brownson Ross C
Author Affiliations: Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (Allen and Crenshaw); Department of Health Policy and Organization, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (Fifolt); School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (Erwin); Research and Evaluation, Public Health Accreditation Board, Alexandria, Virginia (Lang, Belflower Thomas, and Kuehnert); and Lipstein Distinguished Professor of Public Health, Prevention Research Center, Brown School, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center and Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (Brownson).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(2):173-182. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002084. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
This paper describes experiences and views of leadership teams from 4 small local health departments (LHDs) seeking Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition using PHAB Standards & Measures Version 2022. The Pathways program launched in 2022 provides additional supports for improvement of public health practice.
Given the need to accelerate accreditation among small health departments, the purpose of this study is to share small health departments' strategies for overcoming accreditation challenges and actionable advice for use by other health departments.
In this descriptive qualitative study, the study team conducted 22 individual interviews with 4 small LHDs from January to March 2024.
Participating small health departments were located in the Midwestern and Western United States with staff sizes ranging from 3 to 47.
Interview participants included small health department leadership teams, a local board of health member, and a contracted external accreditation consultant.
We used a semi-structured interview guide to elicit participant experiences and views on accreditation processes, benefits, facilitators, strategies for overcoming challenges, and advice for other small health departments.
Participants suggested that accreditation benefits far outweighed the challenges. Perceived benefits included improved organizational procedures, equitable delivery of needed effective programs and services, and enhanced public perception. Key strategies to overcome staff capacity challenges were establishing a team approach and orienting and mentoring new staff in the "why" and "how" of accreditation. Advice included learning what is involved, taking the time to lay a foundation beforehand, and not waiting for a perfect time as accreditation is about improvement, not perfection.
Small health departments can achieve and maintain PHAB accreditation by strategically implementing strategies to overcome staff capacity and other challenges. The Pathways Recognition program is a supportive option for small health departments wanting to improve public health practice.
本文描述了4个小型地方卫生部门(LHD)的领导团队在使用《2022年公共卫生认证委员会(PHAB)标准与措施》寻求PHAB再认证或途径认可方面的经验和观点。2022年启动的途径计划为改善公共卫生实践提供了额外支持。
鉴于小型卫生部门需要加快认证进程,本研究的目的是分享小型卫生部门克服认证挑战的策略以及供其他卫生部门使用的可行建议。
在这项描述性定性研究中,研究团队于2024年1月至3月对4个小型LHD进行了22次个人访谈。
参与研究的小型卫生部门位于美国中西部和西部,员工规模从3人到47人不等。
访谈参与者包括小型卫生部门领导团队、地方卫生委员会成员和签约的外部认证顾问。
我们使用半结构化访谈指南,以了解参与者对认证过程、益处、促进因素、克服挑战的策略以及对其他小型卫生部门的建议的经验和看法。
参与者表示,认证的益处远大于挑战。感知到的益处包括改进组织程序、公平提供所需的有效项目和服务以及提升公众认知。克服人员能力挑战的关键策略是采用团队方法,并在认证的“原因”和“方式”方面对新员工进行指导和培训。建议包括了解所涉及的内容、提前花时间打好基础,不要等待完美时机,因为认证关乎改进,而非完美。
小型卫生部门可以通过战略性地实施克服人员能力和其他挑战的策略来实现并保持PHAB认证。途径认可计划是希望改善公共卫生实践的小型卫生部门的一个支持性选择。