Miami University, USA.
University of South Florida, USA.
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Oct;106:101328. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101328. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
After a long journey in relative obscurity, qualitative research is being accepted in the field of school psychology. As more school psychology researchers and graduate students adopt it as part of their scholarly endeavors, we reflect on the qualitative research published in school psychology since 2006 in terms of what has been done so far and what can be improved going forward. This act of academic retrospection can strengthen qualitative research in school psychology by helping to identify areas of strength and weakness. We read all qualitative studies published in seven school psychology journals between 2006 and 2021 to understand their methodological character. In Section I, we discuss the methodological trends (e.g., approach to inquiry, data collection methods, data analysis strategies) we found. In Section II, we reflect upon this corpus and identify some common misconceptions about qualitative methodologies that stood out to us. We clarify these misconceptions and highlight some examples of 'good' practices in these articles that could be adopted by other researchers. Finally in Section III, we provide some general recommendations about developing school psychologists' understanding of and the ability to conduct qualitative research.
经过漫长的默默无闻之旅,定性研究在学校心理学领域逐渐得到认可。随着越来越多的学校心理学研究人员和研究生将其作为学术努力的一部分,我们反思了自 2006 年以来发表在学校心理学领域的定性研究,思考迄今为止已经完成的工作以及未来可以改进的地方。这种学术反思的行为可以通过帮助确定优势和劣势领域来加强学校心理学中的定性研究。我们阅读了 2006 年至 2021 年间在七本学校心理学期刊上发表的所有定性研究,以了解其方法论特征。在第一节中,我们讨论了我们发现的方法论趋势(例如,探究方法、数据收集方法、数据分析策略)。在第二节中,我们反思了这一文献,并确定了一些我们认为突出的关于定性方法的常见误解。我们澄清了这些误解,并强调了这些文章中一些可以被其他研究人员采用的“良好”实践的例子。最后,在第三节中,我们提供了一些关于发展学校心理学家对定性研究的理解和能力的一般建议。