van Dijk Rianne, Mastrotheodoros Stefanos, van der Valk Inge E, Branje Susan, Deković Maja
Department of Clinical Child & Family Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Youth & Family, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Feb;54(2):383-399. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02064-w. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
Boundary diffusion is a particular risk after divorce and has been associated with adolescents' adjustment problems. Yet, its potential impact on parent-adolescent relationship quality is less straightforward, as previous findings support both an alienation and conflict perspective. Therefore these associations (daily and half-yearly) were examined in recently divorced families, addressing both within-dyad changes and between-dyad differences. Data were collected among a sample of N = 133 (pre)adolescents (M = 11.76; 51.5% boys) from 76 divorced families, using a measurement burst design: Every six months, 14 consecutive days of daily diaries were collected, for 5 waves. Between dyads, adolescents who experienced more boundary diffusion than others, also reported more conflict with both their parents. Within dyads, when adolescents experienced more boundary diffusion than usual by one of their parents (actor), warmth decreased and conflict increased between this parent and the adolescent, that same and the following day. Adolescents also engaged in more conflict with the other parent that day. These findings mostly supported the conflict perspective: Post-divorce boundary diffusion appears to be a general risk factor for parent-adolescent conflict with both parents, and from day-to-day boundary diffusion was linked to a deteriorated parent-adolescent relationship quality, especially with the parent that triangulated or parentified them. There were no significant long-term associations, nor did any moderator (age, gender, living arrangement) explain heterogeneity in effects.
边界扩散是离婚后的一种特殊风险,并且与青少年的适应问题有关。然而,它对亲子关系质量的潜在影响并不那么直接,因为先前的研究结果既支持疏离观点,也支持冲突观点。因此,在最近离婚的家庭中研究了这些关联(每日和半年期),同时考虑了二元组内的变化和二元组间的差异。对来自76个离婚家庭的N = 133名(青春期前)青少年(平均年龄M = 11.76岁;51.5%为男孩)样本进行了数据收集,采用测量突发设计:每六个月收集连续14天的每日日记,共收集5次。在二元组之间,经历比其他人更多边界扩散的青少年,与父母双方的冲突也更多。在二元组内,当青少年经历某一方父母(行为者)比平时更多的边界扩散时,在当天及次日,该父母与青少年之间的温暖感下降,冲突增加。青少年在当天与另一方父母的冲突也更多。这些发现大多支持冲突观点:离婚后的边界扩散似乎是亲子冲突的一个普遍风险因素,并且从日常来看,边界扩散与亲子关系质量的恶化有关,尤其是与使他们卷入三角关系或将他们置于父母角色的一方父母。没有显著的长期关联,也没有任何调节因素(年龄、性别、居住安排)能够解释效应的异质性。