Suppr超能文献

26岁以下性别焦虑症患者的乳房切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析

Mastectomy for Individuals with Gender Dysphoria Younger Than 26 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Miroshnychenko Anna, Roldan Yetiani M, Ibrahim Sara, Kulatunga-Moruzi Chan, Dahlin Kristen, Montante Steven, Couban Rachel, Guyatt Gordon, Brignardello-Petersen Romina

机构信息

From the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact.

independent scholar.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jun 1;155(6):915-923. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011734. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gender dysphoria (GD) refers to psychological distress associated with the incongruence between one's sex and one's gender. In response to GD, birth-registered female patients may choose to undergo mastectomy. In this systematic review, the authors summarize and assess the certainty of the evidence about the effects of mastectomy.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Social Sciences Abstracts, LGBTQ+ Source, and Sociological Abstracts through June 20, 2023. We included studies comparing mastectomy to no mastectomy in birth-registered patients younger than 26 years with GD. Outcomes of interest included psychological and psychiatric outcomes, and physical complications. Pairs of reviewers independently screened articles, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias of the included studies. We performed meta-analysis and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 39 studies. Observational studies ( n = 2) comparing mastectomy to chest binding provided very low-certainty evidence for the outcome of GD. One observational study comparing mastectomy to no mastectomy provided very low-certainty evidence for the outcomes of global functioning and suicide attempts, and low-certainty evidence for the outcome nonsuicidal self-injury (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.97). Before-and-after ( n = 2) studies provided very low-certainty evidence for all outcomes. Evidence from case series ( n = 34) studies ranged from high to very low certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Case series studies demonstrated high-certainty evidence for the outcomes of death, necrosis, and excessive scarring; however, these are limited in methodologic quality. In comparative and before-and-after studies, the evidence ranged from low to very low certainty.

摘要

背景

性别焦虑(GD)是指与一个人的生理性别和心理性别不一致相关的心理困扰。针对性别焦虑,出生时登记为女性的患者可能会选择接受乳房切除术。在本系统评价中,作者总结并评估了关于乳房切除术效果的证据的确定性。

方法

我们检索了截至2023年6月20日的MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、社会科学文摘、LGBTQ + 资源库和社会学文摘。我们纳入了比较乳房切除术与未进行乳房切除术的研究,这些研究的对象为年龄小于26岁且患有性别焦虑的出生时登记的患者。感兴趣的结局包括心理和精神方面的结局以及身体并发症。由两位评审员独立筛选文章、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们进行了荟萃分析,并使用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价方法评估证据的确定性。

结果

我们纳入了39项研究。将乳房切除术与胸部束缚进行比较的观察性研究(n = 2)为性别焦虑结局提供了极低确定性的证据。一项将乳房切除术与未进行乳房切除术进行比较的观察性研究为整体功能和自杀未遂结局提供了极低确定性的证据,为非自杀性自伤结局提供了低确定性的证据(调整后的比值比,0.47;95%可信区间,0.22至0.97)。前后对照研究(n = 2)为所有结局提供了极低确定性的证据。病例系列研究(n = 34)的证据确定性从高到极低不等。

结论

病例系列研究为死亡、坏死和过度瘢痕形成结局提供了高确定性的证据;然而,这些研究在方法学质量上存在局限性。在比较性研究和前后对照研究中,证据确定性从低到极低不等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf1/12105977/e581f8d2aadf/prs-155-00915-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验