Perfetto Kayley, Pozzobon Laura, Sears Kim, O'Hara Jane, Ross-White Amanda, Duhn Lenora
Health Quality Programs, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 Jan 1;23(1):150-157. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00066. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
The objective of this systematic review is to understand the experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level from the perspective of care partners, patients, and health care professionals.
Care partner engagement is a strategy for promoting patient safety in hospitals at the direct care level (ie, at the point where patient care is delivered). When present, care partners can increase safety by watching, listening, and taking action to protect admitted patients. To improve care partner presence policies and safety engagement strategies within hospitals, a comprehensive understanding of the current qualitative evidence about the breadth of experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety is required.
This review will include qualitative studies that consider the experiences of care partners, adult patients, and health care professionals. The engagement of care partners in patient safety within pediatric hospital settings will not be considered.
This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A preliminary literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and a full search strategy was developed for MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (all via Ovid), as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis . The JBI approach to study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis, and assessment of confidence will be followed. Two reviewers will test the screening criteria and data extraction protocol.
PROSPERO CRD42023476286.
本系统评价的目的是从照护伙伴、患者和医疗保健专业人员的角度,了解照护伙伴在直接护理层面参与患者安全工作的经历。
照护伙伴参与是在医院直接护理层面(即提供患者护理的点)促进患者安全的一项策略。当照护伙伴在场时,他们可以通过观察、倾听和采取行动来保护住院患者,从而提高安全性。为了改进医院内照护伙伴在场政策和安全参与策略,需要全面了解当前关于照护伙伴参与患者安全工作经历广度的定性证据。
本评价将纳入考虑照护伙伴、成年患者和医疗保健专业人员经历的定性研究。儿科医院环境中照护伙伴参与患者安全的情况将不予考虑。
本评价将遵循JBI定性证据系统评价方法。在MEDLINE中进行了初步文献检索,并为MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和PsycINFO(均通过Ovid)以及Cochrane系统评价数据库和JBI证据综合库制定了全面的检索策略。将遵循JBI的研究选择、批判性评价、数据提取、数据综合和可信度评估方法。两名评价人员将测试筛选标准和数据提取方案。
PROSPERO CRD42023476286。