• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新校准用于美国退伍军人的结直肠癌联盟遗传和环境风险评分的遗传学和流行病学。

Recalibrating the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium Environmental Risk Score for Use in US Veterans.

机构信息

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Million Veteran Program Coordinating Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Nov 1;33(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0791.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0791
PMID:39254429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk for colorectal cancer may accumulate through multiple environmental factors. Understanding their effects, along with genetics, age, and family history, could allow improvements in clinical decisions for screening protocols. We aimed to extend the previous work by recalibrating an environmental risk score (e-Score) for colorectal cancer among a sample of US veteran participants of the Million Veteran Program.

METHODS

Demographic, lifestyle, and colorectal cancer data from 2011 to 2022 were abstracted from survey responses and health records of 227,504 male Million Veteran Program participants. Weighting for each environmental factor's effect size was recalculated using Veterans Affairs training data to create a recalibrated e-Score. This recalibrated score was compared with the original weighted e-Score in a validation sample of 113,752 (n cases = 590). Nested multiple logistic regression models tested associations between quintiles for recalibrated and original e-Scores. Likelihood ratio tests were used to compare model performance.

RESULTS

Age (P < 0.0001), education (P < 0.0001), diabetes (P < 0.0001), physical activity (P < 0.0001), smoking (P < 0.0001), NSAID use (P < 0.0001), calcium (P = 0.015), folate (P = 0.020), and fruit consumption (P = 0.019) were significantly different between colorectal cancer case and control groups. In the validation sample, the recalibrated e-Score model significantly improved the base model performance (P < 0.001), but the original e-Score model did not (P = 0.07). The recalibrated e-Score model quintile 5 was associated with significantly higher odds for colorectal cancer compared with quintile 1 (Q5 vs. Q1: 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38-2.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple environmental factors and the recalibrated e-Score quintiles were significantly associated with colorectal cancer cases.

IMPACT

A recalibrated, veteran-specific e-Score could be used to help personalize colorectal cancer screening and prevention strategies.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌风险可能通过多种环境因素累积。了解这些因素以及遗传、年龄和家族史的影响,可能有助于改进筛查方案的临床决策。我们旨在通过对百万退伍军人计划(Million Veteran Program)中美国退伍军人参与者的样本进行重新校准,扩展之前关于环境风险评分(e-Score)的工作。

方法

从 2011 年至 2022 年,从 227504 名百万退伍军人计划男性参与者的调查回复和健康记录中提取人口统计学、生活方式和结直肠癌数据。使用退伍军人事务部培训数据重新计算每个环境因素影响大小的权重,以创建重新校准的 e-Score。在 113752 名(n 例=590)验证样本中比较重新校准的 e-Score 与原始加权 e-Score。嵌套多逻辑回归模型测试了重新校准和原始 e-Score 五分位数之间的关联。似然比检验用于比较模型性能。

结果

年龄(P < 0.0001)、教育程度(P < 0.0001)、糖尿病(P < 0.0001)、体力活动(P < 0.0001)、吸烟(P < 0.0001)、非甾体抗炎药使用(P < 0.0001)、钙(P = 0.015)、叶酸(P = 0.020)和水果摄入(P = 0.019)在结直肠癌病例和对照组之间存在显著差异。在验证样本中,重新校准的 e-Score 模型显著提高了基础模型的性能(P < 0.001),但原始 e-Score 模型没有(P = 0.07)。与五分位数 1 相比,重新校准的 e-Score 模型五分位数 5 与结直肠癌的发生显著相关(Q5 与 Q1:1.79;95%CI,1.38-2.33)。

结论

多种环境因素和重新校准的 e-Score 五分位数与结直肠癌病例显著相关。

影响

一个重新校准的、针对退伍军人的 e-Score 可以用于帮助个性化结直肠癌筛查和预防策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136b/11528197/d6f9841166c9/epi-24-0791_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136b/11528197/d6f9841166c9/epi-24-0791_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136b/11528197/d6f9841166c9/epi-24-0791_f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Recalibrating the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium Environmental Risk Score for Use in US Veterans.重新校准用于美国退伍军人的结直肠癌联盟遗传和环境风险评分的遗传学和流行病学。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Nov 1;33(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0791.
2
Determining Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Starting Age of Screening Based on Lifestyle, Environmental, and Genetic Factors.基于生活方式、环境和遗传因素确定结直肠癌风险和筛查起始年龄。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jun;154(8):2152-2164.e19. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
3
Low plasma adiponectin levels and risk of colorectal cancer in men: a prospective study.男性血浆脂联素水平低与结直肠癌风险:一项前瞻性研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Nov 16;97(22):1688-94. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji376.
4
The Structure of Relationships between the Human Exposome and Cardiometabolic Health: The Million Veteran Program.人类外显子组与心脏代谢健康之间关系的结构:百万退伍军人计划。
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 19;13(4):1364. doi: 10.3390/nu13041364.
5
Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system.共病对退伍军人医疗系统中结直肠癌筛查的影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;5(8):991-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
6
Lifetime prevalence and correlates of colorectal cancer screening among low-income U.S. Veterans.美国低收入退伍军人一生中结直肠癌筛查的流行率及相关因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Sep;35(9):1215-1231. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01881-5. Epub 2024 May 7.
7
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
8
Association of Dietary Inflammatory Potential With Colorectal Cancer Risk in Men and Women.饮食炎症指数与男性和女性结直肠癌风险的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):366-373. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4844.
9
Measuring Frailty Using Self-Report or Automated Tools to Identify Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: The Million Veteran Program.使用自我报告或自动化工具测量虚弱程度以识别心血管事件和死亡率风险:百万退伍军人计划。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e033111. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033111. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
10
The Association Between Primary Source of Healthcare Coverage and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among US Veterans.美国退伍军人医疗保健覆盖的主要来源与结直肠癌筛查之间的关联
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Aug;62(8):1923-1932. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4607-x. Epub 2017 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer.关键研究差距及建议,为结直肠癌更有效的预防和改善预后的研究优先级提供参考。
Gut. 2018 Jan;67(1):179-193. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315333.
2
The Cancer Epidemiology Descriptive Cohort Database: A Tool to Support Population-Based Interdisciplinary Research.癌症流行病学描述性队列数据库:一种支持基于人群的跨学科研究的工具。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Oct;25(10):1392-1401. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0412. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Educational Attainment and Nonwage Labor Market Returns in the United States.美国的教育程度与非工资劳动力市场回报
AERA Open. 2019 Jul-Sep;5(3). doi: 10.1177/2332858419874056. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Black-White disparities in colorectal cancer outcomes: a simulation study of screening benefit.黑人和白人在结直肠癌结局方面的差异:筛查获益的模拟研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023 Nov 8;2023(62):196-203. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad019.
4
Data Resource Profile: Self-reported data in the Million Veteran Program: survey development and insights from the first 850 736 participants.数据资源简介:百万退伍军人计划中的自我报告数据:调查开发及来自首批850736名参与者的见解
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):e1-e17. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac133.
5
Using cancer risk algorithms to improve risk estimates and referral decisions.使用癌症风险算法来改善风险评估和转诊决策。
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 10;2:2. doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00069-1. eCollection 2022.
6
Participation bias, self-selection bias, and response bias.参与偏倚、自我选择偏倚和应答偏倚。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.025.
7
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
8
Individual and Joint Associations of Genetic Risk and Healthy Lifestyle Score with Colorectal Neoplasms Among Participants of Screening Colonoscopy.个体和联合遗传风险与健康生活方式评分与筛查结肠镜检查参与者结直肠肿瘤的关系。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Jun;14(6):649-658. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0576. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
Calibration of polygenic risk scores is required prior to clinical implementation: results of three common cancers in UKB.多基因风险评分在临床实施前需要进行校准:UKB 中三种常见癌症的结果。
J Med Genet. 2022 Mar;59(3):243-247. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107286. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
10
Impact of Gene-Environment Interactions on Cancer Development.基因-环境相互作用对癌症发展的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;17(21):8089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218089.