Division of Aging Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA.
Division of Cardiology Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e033111. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033111. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Frailty, a syndrome of physiologic vulnerability, increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Whether in person or automated frailty tools are ideal for identifying CVD risk remains unclear. We calculated 3 distinct frailty scores and examined their associations with mortality and CVD events in the Million Veteran Program, a prospective cohort of nearly 1 million US veterans.
Veterans aged ≥50 years and enrolled from 2011 to 2018 were included. Two frailty indices (FI) based on the deficit accumulation theory were calculated: the questionnaire-based 36-item Million Veteran Program-FI and 31-item Veterans Affairs-FI using claims data. We calculated Fried physical frailty using the self-reported, 3-item Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models examined the association of frailty by each score with primary (all-cause and CVD mortality) and secondary (myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure) outcomes. In 190 688 veterans (69±9 years, 94% male, 85% White), 33, 233 (17%) all-cause and 10 115 (5%) CVD deaths occurred. Using Million Veteran Program-FI, 29% were robust, 42% pre-frail, and 29% frail. Frailty prevalence increased by age group (27% in 50-59 to 42% in ≥90 years). Using the Million Veteran Program-FI, over 6±2 years, frail veterans had a higher hazard of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05 [95% CI, 2.95-3.16]) and CVD mortality (HR, 3.65 [95% CI, 3.43-3.90]). Findings were concordant for the Veterans Affairs-FI and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures frailty definitions, and remained significant even among younger veterans aged 50-59 years.
Irrespective of frailty measure, frailty is associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and adverse CVD events. Further study of frailty in veterans aged <60 years old is warranted.
衰弱是一种生理脆弱的综合征,会增加心血管疾病(CVD)的风险。无论是通过人工还是自动化的衰弱工具来识别 CVD 风险,目前仍不清楚哪种方法更为理想。我们计算了 3 种不同的衰弱评分,并在百万退伍军人计划中对其与死亡率和 CVD 事件的相关性进行了研究,该计划是一项近 100 万美国退伍军人的前瞻性队列研究。
纳入年龄≥50 岁且于 2011 年至 2018 年期间入组的退伍军人。根据缺陷积累理论计算了 2 种衰弱指数(FI):基于问卷调查的 36 项百万退伍军人计划-FI 和使用索赔数据的 31 项退伍军人事务-FI。我们使用自我报告的 3 项骨质疏松性骨折研究来计算 Fried 身体衰弱。多变量调整的 Cox 模型检查了每种评分的衰弱与主要(全因和 CVD 死亡率)和次要(心肌梗死、卒中和心力衰竭)结局的相关性。在 190688 名退伍军人(69±9 岁,94%为男性,85%为白人)中,发生了 33233 例(17%)全因和 10115 例(5%)CVD 死亡。使用百万退伍军人计划-FI,29%为健壮,42%为虚弱前期,29%为衰弱。衰弱的患病率随年龄组增加(50-59 岁为 27%,≥90 岁为 42%)。使用百万退伍军人计划-FI,在 6±2 年的时间里,衰弱的退伍军人全因死亡(危险比[HR],3.05[95%CI,2.95-3.16])和 CVD 死亡(HR,3.65[95%CI,3.43-3.90])的风险更高。退伍军人事务-FI 和骨质疏松性骨折衰弱定义的研究结果一致,即使在年龄在 50-59 岁的年轻退伍军人中,结果仍然显著。
无论采用哪种衰弱测量方法,衰弱与全因死亡率和不良 CVD 事件的风险增加相关。有必要进一步研究年龄<60 岁的退伍军人的衰弱情况。