Zuqui-Ramírez Miguel A, Belalcazar-López Victor M, Urenda-Quezada Adelfia, González-Rebatu Y González Alejandro, Sander-Padilla José G, Lugo-Sánchez Laura A, Rodríguez-Vázquez Ileana C, Rios-Brito Kevin F, Arguedas-Núñez María M, Canales-Vázquez Emmanuel, González-Canudas Jorge
Ícaro Investigaciones en Medicina S.A. de C.V., Ignacio Allende 1011, 31000, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Mediadvance Clinical S.A.P.I. de C.V., Antonio de Montes 6900 Col. Panamericana, 31210, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Pain Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1511-1528. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00653-y. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
Pain and disability management are crucial for a speedy recovery. Combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action provides greater pain relief with lower doses, promoting efficient multimodal analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between two fixed-dose combinations (FDC): etoricoxib/tramadol compared to paracetamol/tramadol for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) in a 7-day treatment.
We conducted a phase IIIb, prospective, randomized, and multicenter study in patients with acute LBP treated with etoricoxib 90 mg/tramadol 50 mg (one packet of granules diluted in 100 ml of water, once a day [QD], for 7 days) or paracetamol 975 mg/tramadol 112.5 mg (one tablet of 325 mg/37.5 mg, three times a day [TID], for 7 days) to assess the efficacy (in terms of pain and disability improvement) and safety.
One hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to receive either etoricoxib/tramadol QD (n = 61) or paracetamol/tramadol TID (n = 63). From the magnitude of change in pain evaluations, differences were observed between the treatment groups at 3 [p = 0.054, CI 95% - 0.648 (- 0.010 to 1.306)] and 5 days (p = 0.041). The proportion of patients with a 30% reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was statistically significant when comparing the treatment groups on the third day of follow-up [p = 0.008, CI 95% 0.241 (0.061-0.421)]. An improvement in LBP's disability to perform activities of daily routine (Oswestry and Roland-Morris questionnaires) was observed in both treatment groups. A total of 79 adverse events (AEs) (38 [48.1%] with etoricoxib/tramadol and 41 [51.9%] with paracetamol/tramadol) were reported. The most frequent AEs were nausea (17.7%) and dizziness (16.4%).
The results show the clinical benefits of etoricoxib/tramadol FDC, such as the sparing effect of tramadol dose per day, early therapeutic response rate compared with paracetamol/tramadol; which translates into faster pain relief, better adherence, less tramadol drug dependency, and a reduction of related AEs incidence.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04968158.
疼痛和功能障碍管理对于快速康复至关重要。将具有不同作用机制的镇痛药联合使用,可在较低剂量下提供更好的疼痛缓解效果,从而促进有效的多模式镇痛。本研究评估了两种固定剂量组合(FDC):依托考昔/曲马多与对乙酰氨基酚/曲马多在7天治疗期内对急性下腰痛(LBP)的疗效和安全性。
我们对急性LBP患者进行了一项IIIb期、前瞻性、随机、多中心研究,这些患者接受依托考昔90毫克/曲马多50毫克(一包颗粒剂用100毫升水稀释,每天一次[QD],共7天)或对乙酰氨基酚975毫克/曲马多112.5毫克(一片325毫克/37.5毫克,每天三次[TID],共7天)治疗,以评估疗效(根据疼痛和功能障碍改善情况)和安全性。
124例患者被随机分为接受依托考昔/曲马多QD治疗组(n = 61)或对乙酰氨基酚/曲马多TID治疗组(n = 63)。从疼痛评估的变化幅度来看,治疗组在第3天[p = 0.054,95%CI -0.648(-0.010至1.306)]和第5天(p = 0.041)观察到差异。在随访的第三天比较治疗组时,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分降低30%的患者比例具有统计学意义[p = 0.008,95%CI 0.241(0.061 - 0.421)]。两个治疗组均观察到LBP患者进行日常生活活动的功能障碍(奥斯威斯和罗兰 - 莫里斯问卷)有所改善。共报告了79例不良事件(AE)(依托考昔/曲马多组38例[48.1%],对乙酰氨基酚/曲马多组41例[51.9%])。最常见的AE是恶心(17.7%)和头晕(16.4%)。
结果显示了依托考昔/曲马多FDC的临床益处,如每天曲马多剂量的节省效应、与对乙酰氨基酚/曲马多相比的早期治疗反应率;这转化为更快的疼痛缓解、更好的依从性、更少的曲马多药物依赖性以及相关AE发生率的降低。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT04968158。