Eck Institute for Global Health & Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Malar J. 2024 Sep 10;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05096-6.
Reactive case detection (RCD) aims to reduce malaria transmission stemming from asymptomatic carriers. Symptomatic individuals diagnosed with malaria at a health centre are followed to their households, where members of the index case and neighbouring households are tested and treated for malaria. An RCD programme was tested in the Ashanti region of Ghana in order to study diagnostic accuracy in the hospital and household settings, assess the prevalence of subclinical infections and possible clustering in index case households, and identify operational challenges for future RCD programmes. Currently, transmission in this region is high, but reactive interventions might become an option once transmission is reduced.
264 febrile individuals were enrolled at the Mankranso Government Hospital and tested for malaria using rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). From the pool of RDT-positive febrile index cases, 14 successful RCD follow-ups were conducted, and 233 individuals were enrolled from the index case, neighbour, and control households. The sensitivity of diagnostic tools for clinical and subclinical cases was compared, including RDT, expert microscopy by World Health Organization-certified microscopists, field microscopy, and qPCR.
Poor diagnosis and low receptivity to RCD-style follow-ups were major limitations to a successful and effective RCD programme. Field microscopy detected only 49% of clinical infections compared to RDT. 54% of individuals did not agree to a follow-up, and 66% of attempted follow-ups failed. The system effectiveness of RCD, calculated as the product of correctly diagnosed index cases, successful follow-ups, and proportion of asymptomatic infections detected by RDT, was very low at 4.0%.
Due to low system effectiveness and the endemic nature of the disease setting in which asymptomatic prevalence is high and infections are not clustered around index case households, RCD is currently not a feasible option for malaria control in this region. The operational challenges identified through this study may help inform future reactive intervention programme designs once transmission is reduced.
反应性病例检测(RCD)旨在减少无症状感染者引起的疟疾传播。在卫生中心被诊断患有疟疾的症状性个体被追踪到其家庭,对索引病例和邻近家庭的成员进行疟疾检测和治疗。在加纳阿散蒂地区测试了一项 RCD 计划,以研究医院和家庭环境中的诊断准确性,评估亚临床感染的流行率和索引病例家庭中可能的聚集情况,并确定未来 RCD 计划的运营挑战。目前,该地区的传播率很高,但一旦传播减少,反应性干预可能成为一种选择。
在曼克朗索政府医院招募了 264 名发热个体,并使用快速诊断测试(RDT)检测疟疾。从 RDT 阳性发热索引病例中,成功进行了 14 次 RCD 随访,并从索引病例、邻居和对照家庭中招募了 233 名个体。比较了诊断工具对临床和亚临床病例的敏感性,包括 RDT、世界卫生组织认证显微镜专家的显微镜检查、现场显微镜检查和 qPCR。
诊断不佳和对 RCD 式随访的低接受度是成功和有效的 RCD 计划的主要限制。现场显微镜检查仅检测到 49%的临床感染,而 RDT 则检测到 54%的个体不同意随访,66%的尝试随访失败。RCD 的系统有效性,计算为正确诊断的索引病例、成功的随访和 RDT 检测到的无症状感染比例的乘积,非常低,仅为 4.0%。
由于系统有效性低,以及疾病流行地区的性质,无症状流行率高,感染未集中在索引病例家庭周围,因此 RCD 目前不是该地区疟疾控制的可行选择。通过这项研究确定的运营挑战可能有助于在传播减少后为未来的反应性干预计划设计提供信息。