Suppr超能文献

伯氨喹用于减少恶性疟原虫传播。

Primaquine for reducing Plasmodium falciparum transmission.

作者信息

Graves Patricia M, Gelband Hellen, Garner Paul

机构信息

EpiVec Consulting, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD008152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008152.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mosquitoes become infected with malaria when they ingest gametocyte stages of the parasite from the blood of a human host. Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes are sensitive to the drug primaquine (PQ). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends giving a single dose or short course of PQ alongside primary treatment for people ill with P. falciparum infection to reduce malaria transmission. Gametocytes themselves cause no symptoms, so this intervention does not directly benefit individuals. PQ causes haemolysis in some people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency so may not be safe.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether a single dose or short course of PQ added to treatments for malaria caused by P. falciparum infection reduces malaria transmission and is safe.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to 10 April 2012 for studies: the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; EMBASE; LILACS; metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) and the WHO trials search portal using 'malaria*', 'falciparum', and 'primaquine' as search terms. In addition, we searched conference proceedings and reference lists of included studies, and we contacted likely researchers and organizations for relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials of mass treatment of whole populations (or actively detected fever or malaria cases within such populations) with antimalarial drugs, compared to treatment with the same drug plus PQ; or patients with clinical malaria being treated for malaria at health facilities randomized to short course/single dose PQ versus no PQ.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors (PMG and HG) independently screened all abstracts, applied inclusion criteria, and abstracted data. We sought data on the effect of PQ on malaria transmission intensity, participant infectiousness, the number of participants with gametocytes, and gametocyte density over time. We stratified results by primary treatment drug as this may modify any PQ effect. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for gametocyte density over time for comparisons for which data were available, and also sought data on haematologic and other adverse effects. We used GRADE guidelines to assess evidence quality, and this is reflected in the wording of the results: high quality ("PQ reduces ...."); moderate quality ("PQ probably reduces ..."); low quality ("PQ may reduce...."); and very low quality ("we don't know if PQ reduces....").

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 individually randomized trials, with a total of 1776 individuals. The 11 trials included 20 comparisons with partner drugs, which included chloroquine (CQ), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), mefloquine (MQ), quinine (QN), artesunate (AS), and a variety of artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs). For G6PD deficiency, studies either did not test (one study), tested and included all (one study), included only G6PD deficient (one study), excluded G6PD deficient (two studies), or made no comment (six studies).None of the trials we included assessed effects on malaria transmission (incidence, prevalence, or entomological inoculation rate (EIR)) in the trial area.With non-artemisinin drug regimens, PQ may reduce the infectiousness to mosquitoes of individuals treated, based on one small study with large effects (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.06 on day 8 after treatment, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0 to 0.89; low quality evidence). Participants who received PQ had fewer circulating gametocytes up to day 43 (log(10) AUC relative decrease from 24.3 to 27.1%, one study (two comparisons), moderate quality evidence); and there were 38% fewer people with gametocytes on day 8 (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.76, four studies (five comparisons), moderate quality evidence). We did not identify any study that looked for effects of the drug on haemolytic anaemia.With artemisinin-based drug regimens, we do not know if PQ influences infectiousness to mosquitoes, as no study has examined this directly. PQ probably reduces infectiousness, based on reduction in log(10) AUC (relative decrease range from 26.1% to 87.5%, two studies (six comparisons), moderate quality evidence); and reduces by 88% the number of participants with gametocytes on day 8 (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.20, four studies (eight comparisons), moderate quality evidence).When used with artemisinin-based regimens, we do not know if PQ results in haemolytic anaemia; one trial reported percent change in mean haemoglobin against baseline, and for the PQ group this indicated a significantly greater drop at day 8 in those given PQ (very low quality evidence). Overall, the safety of PQ used in single dose or short course was poorly evaluated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We do not know whether PQ added to treatment regimens for patients with P. falciparum infection reduces transmission of malaria. In individual patients, it reduces gametocyte prevalence and density. In practical terms, even if PQ results in large reductions in gametocytes in people being treated for malaria, there is no reliable evidence that this will reduce transmission in a malaria-endemic community, where many people are infected but have no symptoms and are unlikely to be treated. Since PQ is acting as a monotherapy against gametocytes, there is a risk of the parasite developing resistance to the drug. In terms of harms, there is insufficient evidence from trials to know whether the drug can be used safely in this way in populations where G6PD deficiency occurs.In light of these doubts about safety, and lack of evidence of any benefit in reducing transmission, countries should question whether to continue to use PQ routinely in primary treatment of malaria. Further synthesis of observational data on safety and new trials may help elucidate a role for PQ in malaria elimination, or in situations where most infected individuals are symptomatic and receive treatment.

摘要

背景

蚊子从人类宿主血液中摄取疟原虫的配子体阶段时会感染疟疾。恶性疟原虫配子体对药物伯氨喹(PQ)敏感。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在对恶性疟原虫感染患者进行初级治疗时,同时给予单剂量或短疗程的PQ,以减少疟疾传播。配子体本身不会引起症状,因此这种干预措施不会直接使个体受益。PQ会使一些葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)缺乏的人发生溶血,因此可能不安全。

目的

评估在恶性疟原虫感染引起的疟疾治疗中添加单剂量或短疗程的PQ是否能减少疟疾传播且安全。

检索方法

我们检索了以下数据库直至2012年4月10日的研究:Cochrane传染病小组专业注册库;发表于《Cochrane图书馆》的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL);MEDLINE;EMBASE;LILACS;对照试验元注册库(mRCT)以及WHO试验检索门户,使用“疟疾*”、“恶性疟原虫”和“伯氨喹”作为检索词。此外,我们检索了会议论文集和纳入研究的参考文献列表,并联系了可能的研究人员和组织以获取相关试验。

选择标准

对整个人群(或在此类人群中主动检测到的发热或疟疾病例)进行抗疟药物大规模治疗的试验,与使用相同药物加PQ的治疗进行比较;或在卫生设施中对临床疟疾病例进行疟疾治疗的患者,随机分为短疗程/单剂量PQ组与无PQ组。

数据收集与分析

两位作者(PMG和HG)独立筛选所有摘要,应用纳入标准并提取数据。我们寻求关于PQ对疟疾传播强度、参与者传染性、有配子体的参与者数量以及配子体密度随时间变化的影响的数据。我们按初级治疗药物对结果进行分层,因为这可能会改变PQ的任何效果。对于有可用数据的比较,我们计算了配子体密度随时间变化的曲线下面积(AUC),并寻求关于血液学和其他不良反应的数据。我们使用GRADE指南评估证据质量,这在结果的措辞中有所体现:高质量(“PQ降低……”);中等质量(“PQ可能降低……”);低质量(“PQ可能降低……”);以及极低质量(“我们不知道PQ是否能降低……”)。

主要结果

我们纳入了11项个体随机试验,共1776名个体。这11项试验包括与对照药物的20项比较,对照药物包括氯喹(CQ)、磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP)、甲氟喹(MQ)、奎宁(QN)、青蒿琥酯(AS)以及多种青蒿素联合疗法(ACTs)。对于G6PD缺乏,研究要么未进行检测(1项研究)、进行了检测并纳入了所有患者(1项研究)、仅纳入了G6PD缺乏患者(1项研究)、排除了G6PD缺乏患者(2项研究),要么未作说明(6项研究)。我们纳入的试验均未评估对试验地区疟疾传播(发病率、患病率或昆虫接种率(EIR))的影响。对于非青蒿素药物方案,基于一项有显著效果的小型研究,PQ可能会降低接受治疗个体对蚊子的传染性(治疗后第8天风险比(RR)为0.06,95%置信区间(CI)为0至0.89;低质量证据)。接受PQ的参与者在第43天前循环配子体较少(log(10) AUC相对下降24.3%至27.1%,1项研究(2项比较);中等质量证据);第8天有配子体的人数减少38%(RR 0.62,95%CI 0.51至0.76,4项研究(5项比较);中等质量证据)。我们未找到任何研究考察该药物对溶血性贫血的影响。对于基于青蒿素药物方案,我们不知道PQ是否会影响对蚊子的传染性,因为没有研究直接对此进行过考察。基于log(10) AUC的降低(相对下降范围为26.1%至87.5%,2项研究(6项比较);中等质量证据),PQ可能会降低传染性;第8天有配子体的参与者数量减少88%(RR 0.12,95%CI为0.08至0.20,4项研究(8项比较);中等质量证据)。当与基于青蒿素的方案一起使用时,我们不知道PQ是否会导致溶血性贫血;一项试验报告了平均血红蛋白相对于基线的百分比变化,对于PQ组,这表明在第8天接受PQ的患者中下降幅度显著更大(极低质量证据)。总体而言,单剂量或短疗程使用PQ的安全性评估不足。

作者结论

我们不知道在恶性疟原虫感染患者的治疗方案中添加PQ是否能降低疟疾传播。在个体患者中,它可降低配子体的患病率和密度。实际上,即使PQ能大幅减少正在接受疟疾治疗患者体内的配子体数量,也没有可靠证据表明这会降低疟疾流行社区的传播,在该社区中许多人被感染但无症状且不太可能接受治疗。由于PQ作为针对配子体的单一疗法,存在寄生虫对该药物产生耐药性的风险。就危害而言,试验中没有足够证据表明在发生G6PD缺乏的人群中以这种方式使用该药物是否安全。鉴于对安全性的这些疑虑以及缺乏减少传播方面任何益处的证据,各国应质疑是否继续在疟疾的初级治疗中常规使用PQ。进一步综合关于安全性的观察数据和新的试验可能有助于阐明PQ在消除疟疾或在大多数感染个体有症状并接受治疗的情况下的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验