• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教学活动学习乐趣量表的编制与应用。

Development and application of a learning enjoyment scale for pedagogical activities.

机构信息

Physiology, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, 11172, United Arab Emirates.

Physiology, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Jul 31;13:273. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147393.2. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.147393.2
PMID:39257449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11384189/
Abstract

The impact of learning enjoyment on motivation, enthusiasm, and overall learning experiences is significant. Previous studies, lacking an unbiased tool for measuring enjoyment and confronting various influencing factors, produced conflicting results regarding enjoyment levels in different instructional methods. Hence, we developed a learning enjoyment scale for evaluating both active and passive educational activities. We applied the developed scale to 112 first-year medical and dental students to assess their enjoyment during didactic physiology lectures and explored possible associated factors. Within this data note, we present students' responses to the developed LES. The LES encompasses six dimensions: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, concentration, and enjoyment. Students provided ratings for each dimension on a five-point Likert scale, spanning from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The cumulative scores across the six dimensions range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. These total scores can be categorized as excellent (> 24), acceptable (18-24), or low (< 18). The second section of the dataset examines specific factors influencing overall enjoyment, such as teacher proficiency, topic difficulty, active student participation, objectives fulfillment, low stress levels, and self-perceived acquisition of skills. In addition to objective measurement of students' enjoyment level, the LES can be utilized for quantitative cross-comparisons between different teaching activities. By employing this dataset, we will undertake an analysis to determine the internal consistency of the Learning Enjoyment Scale (LES), with the anticipation that the outcomes will be published in another venue.

摘要

学习乐趣对动机、热情和整体学习体验有重大影响。以前的研究缺乏衡量乐趣的公正工具,并且面临各种影响因素,导致不同教学方法中的乐趣水平产生冲突的结果。因此,我们开发了一种学习乐趣量表,用于评估主动和被动教育活动。我们将开发的量表应用于 112 名医学和牙科学一年级学生,评估他们在理论生理学讲座中的乐趣,并探讨可能的相关因素。在本数据说明中,我们展示了学生对开发的 LES 的反应。LES 包括六个维度:知识、理解、应用、分析、专注和乐趣。学生对每个维度的评价都在五点李克特量表上进行,范围从 1(强烈不同意)到 5(强烈同意)。六个维度的累积分数最低为 6,最高为 30。这些总分可分为优秀(>24)、可接受(18-24)或低(<18)。数据集的第二部分检查了影响整体乐趣的具体因素,例如教师水平、主题难度、学生积极参与、目标实现、低压力水平和自我感知技能的获得。除了客观衡量学生的乐趣水平外,LES 还可用于不同教学活动之间的定量交叉比较。通过使用此数据集,我们将进行分析以确定学习乐趣量表(LES)的内部一致性,预计结果将在另一个场所发布。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed1/11384197/b28543fbac3a/f1000research-13-169714-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed1/11384197/b28543fbac3a/f1000research-13-169714-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed1/11384197/b28543fbac3a/f1000research-13-169714-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and application of a learning enjoyment scale for pedagogical activities.教学活动学习乐趣量表的编制与应用。
F1000Res. 2024 Jul 31;13:273. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147393.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploration of mental health of health students: Dental and medical formations promote anhedonia.健康专业学生心理健康状况探究:牙科与医学专业易引发快感缺失。
Encephale. 2018 Apr;44(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.10.006. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
An appraisal of students' awareness of "self-reflection" in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education.对本科医学/牙科教育一年级病理学课程中学生“自我反思”意识的评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Sep 23;11:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-67.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
[Can medical students' motivation for a course of basic physiology education integrating into lectures some active learning methods be improved?].[将一些主动学习方法融入讲座的基础生理学教育课程能否提高医学生的学习动机?]
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Dec 26;28:315. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.315.10251. eCollection 2017.
7
Implementation of a Student-Teacher-Based Blended Curriculum for the Training of Medical Students for Nasopharyngeal Swab and Intramuscular Injection: Mixed Methods Pre-Post and Satisfaction Surveys.基于师生的混合式课程在医学生鼻咽拭子采集和肌内注射培训中的实施:混合方法前后测及满意度调查
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Mar 2;9:e38870. doi: 10.2196/38870.
8
Dental Hygiene Clinical Instructors' Pedagogical Beliefs and Described Practices About Student-Centered Education.口腔卫生临床教师关于以学生为中心教育的教学信念和描述性实践。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Sep;83(9):1019-1029. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.106. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Interactive Lecture in the Dissection Hall: Transforming Passive Lecture into a Dynamic Learning Experience.解剖教室互动式讲座:将被动讲座转变为生动的学习体验。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;12(2):191-199. doi: 10.1002/ase.1803. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
Self-determined motivation and associated factors among health professions students in distance learning: a cross-sectional study in Morocco.远程学习的卫生专业学生的自主激励及其相关因素:摩洛哥的一项横断面研究。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Mar;35(1):33-43. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.247. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-life scenario blended teaching approach for nurturing inquisitive learning of central nervous system in medical students.用于培养医学生对中枢神经系统探究性学习的真实情景混合式教学方法。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2023 Mar 1;47(1):124-138. doi: 10.1152/advan.00054.2022. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
2
Student engagement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 152.学生参与健康职业教育:AMEE 指南第 152 号。
Med Teach. 2023 Sep;45(9):949-965. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2137018. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Team-based learning versus interactive lecture in achieving learning outcomes and improving clinical reasoning skills: a randomized crossover study.
团队学习与互动讲座在实现学习成果和提高临床推理技能方面的比较:一项随机交叉研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 7;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03411-w.
4
The relationship between medical student engagement in the provision of the school's education programme and learning outcomes.医学生参与学校教育计划的提供与学习成果之间的关系。
Med Teach. 2022 Aug;44(8):900-906. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2047168. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Appraisal of a novel pedagogical approach to demonstrating neuromuscular transmission to medical students.评估一种向医学生演示神经肌肉传递的新教学方法。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Sep 1;45(3):580-588. doi: 10.1152/advan.00221.2020.
6
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan.基于问题的讲座与传统讲座在苏丹生理学教学中的效果比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 23;19(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1799-0.
8
Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom.测量实际学习与感觉学习,以回应在课堂上的积极参与。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 24;116(39):19251-19257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821936116. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
Learning styles of medical students - implications in education.医学生的学习风格——对教育的启示
Curr Health Sci J. 2014 Apr-Jun;40(2):104-10. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.40.02.04. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
10
The ELEPHANT criteria in medical education: can medical education be fun?医学教育中的 ELEPHANT 标准:医学教育可以有趣吗?
Med Teach. 2010;32(3):195-7. doi: 10.3109/01421591003614866.