Suppr超能文献

放射性淋巴细胞减少是食管癌放化疗后生存的一个因果中介因素。

Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia is a Causal Mediator of Survival After Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophagus Cancer.

作者信息

Chen Yiqing, Chu Yan, van Rossum Peter S N, Grassberger Clemens, Lin Steven H, Mohan Radhe, Hobbs Brian P

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 26;9(10):101579. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101579. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is common during chemoradiation therapy. Severe lymphopenia is associated with reduced survival. Proton beam therapy (PBT), with its substantially more compact dose distributions, spares circulating lymphocytes and immune organs at risk to a greater extent than photon therapy. Recent studies comparing PBT to photon radiation therapy, specifically intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer (EC), showed that the incidence of grade 4 RIL (G4RIL) is significantly reduced among patients receiving PBT for EC. However, whether the extent of this reduction has a direct causative link with improved survival is unknown. This study applies causal mediation analysis to answer this question.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively assessed 734 patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for biopsy-proven EC from 2004 to 2017. To address the potential for bias in the choice of radiation modality, propensity score analysis was used to evaluate and reduce imbalances between the PBT and IMRT cohorts. Causal mediation analysis was applied to decompose the total effect of radiation modality on overall survival (OS) into indirect (mediated through G4RIL) and direct effects.

RESULTS

We found that PBT was associated with a significantly lower incidence of G4RIL and prolonged OS compared with IMRT (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60; < .001). In the propensity-matched cohort of 506 patients (253 PBT, 253 IMRT), G4RIL risk reduction with PBT versus IMRT translated into a 5% reduction in the relative rate of death ( = .032). Mediation of G4RIL explained ∼14.5% of the difference in OS.

CONCLUSIONS

G4RIL was found to mediate survival; however, a statistically significant direct effect of PBT on survival was not observed. In other words, the statistical significance of survival benefit from protons over photons in this EC cohort was lost in the absence of G4RIL risk reduction.

摘要

目的

放化疗期间放射性淋巴细胞减少(RIL)很常见。严重淋巴细胞减少与生存率降低有关。质子束治疗(PBT)的剂量分布明显更紧凑,与光子治疗相比,能在更大程度上保护循环淋巴细胞和有风险的免疫器官。最近比较PBT与光子放射治疗,特别是用于食管癌(EC)的调强放射治疗(IMRT)的研究表明,接受EC的PBT治疗的患者中4级RIL(G4RIL)的发生率显著降低。然而,这种降低程度与生存率提高是否有直接因果关系尚不清楚。本研究应用因果中介分析来回答这个问题。

方法和材料

我们回顾性评估了2004年至2017年期间接受同步放化疗治疗经活检证实的EC的734例患者。为了解决放射治疗方式选择中潜在的偏倚,采用倾向评分分析来评估和减少PBT和IMRT队列之间的不平衡。应用因果中介分析将放射治疗方式对总生存期(OS)的总效应分解为间接效应(通过G4RIL介导)和直接效应。

结果

我们发现,与IMRT相比,PBT的G4RIL发生率显著降低,OS延长(优势比,0.41;95%CI,0.28 - 0.60;P <.001)。在倾向匹配的506例患者队列(253例PBT,253例IMRT)中,与IMRT相比,PBT降低G4RIL风险转化为相对死亡率降低5%(P =.032)。G4RIL的中介作用解释了OS差异的约14.5%。

结论

发现G4RIL介导生存;然而,未观察到PBT对生存有统计学显著的直接效应。换句话说,在没有降低G4RIL风险的情况下,该EC队列中质子治疗相对于光子治疗生存获益的统计学显著性消失了。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3099/11382310/4575a80f7397/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验