Deschênes Marie-France, Dionne Éric, Robert-Boluda Laura
About the Authors Marie-France Deschênes, PhD, RN, is assistant professor, Faculty of Nursing Science, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada, and a regular researcher, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montréal, Canada. Éric Dionne, PhD, is professor, Faculty of Education Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, and research chair, Institut du Savoir de l'Hôpital Montfort, Ottawa, Canada. Laura Robert-Boluda, MSc, RNAm, is a doctoral student, Faculté des Sciences de l'Education et de la Formation, Université Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France. The first author received a postdoctoral fellowship scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. For more information, contact Dr. Deschênes, at
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2025;46(3):173-175. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Questions persist regarding the evaluation of cognitive processes related to clinical reasoning when resolving situations in a learning by concordance tool. This Delphi technique study aimed to validate a clinical reasoning assessment rubric based on script theory. Seventeen experts participated in the study. Two rounds of consultation were conducted to obtain a consensus on the accuracy and clarity of the rubric descriptors (clarity index and content validity index ≥ 0.9). The results inform future research procedures and the intended use of the rubric to facilitate evaluator inferences, provide student feedback, and support the development of learners' clinical reasoning.
在通过一致性工具解决问题的过程中，对于与临床推理相关的认知过程的评估仍存在疑问。这项德尔菲技术研究旨在验证基于脚本理论的临床推理评估量表。17名专家参与了该研究。进行了两轮咨询，以就量表描述符的准确性和清晰度达成共识（清晰度指数和内容效度指数≥0.9）。研究结果为未来的研究程序以及该量表的预期用途提供了参考，以促进评估者的推断、为学生提供反馈，并支持学习者临床推理能力的发展。
