• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过一致性学习(LbC)来发展专业推理技能:AMEE 指南第 141 号。

Learning by concordance (LbC) to develop professional reasoning skills: AMEE Guide No. 141.

机构信息

Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Centre de pédagogie appliquée aux sciences de la santé (CPASS), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2021 Jun;43(6):614-621. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1900554. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1900554
PMID:33779476
Abstract

Developing effective clinical reasoning is central to health professions education. Learning by concordance (LbC) is an on-line educational strategy that makes learners practice reasoning competency in case-based clinical situations. The questions asked are similar to those professionals ask themselves in their practice and participant answers are compared to those of a reference panel. When participants answer the questions, they receive an automated feedback that is two-fold as they see (1) how the panelists respond and (2) justifications each panelist gives for their answer. This provides rich contextual knowledge about the situation, supplemented by a synthesis summarizing crucial points. As many educators in the health sciences are engaging in introducing innovative approaches, many consider building LbC learning modules. Elaborating, designing and implementing a LbC tool remain a challenge. This AMEE Guide describes the steps and elements to be considered when designing a LbC tool, drawing on examples from distinct health professions: medicine, nursing, physiotherapy, and dentistry. Specifically, the following elements will be discussed: (1) LbC theoretical underpinnings; (2) principles of LbC questioning; (3) goals of the concordance-based activity; (4) nature of reasoning tasks; (5) content/levels of complexity; (6) reference panel; (7) feedback/synthesis messages; (8) on-line learning platforms.

摘要

发展有效的临床推理能力是健康专业教育的核心。一致性学习(LbC)是一种在线教育策略,使学习者在基于案例的临床情境中练习推理能力。提出的问题与专业人员在实践中提出的问题相似,参与者的答案与参考小组的答案进行比较。当参与者回答问题时,他们会收到自动反馈,他们可以看到(1)小组成员的回答和(2)每位小组成员对其答案的理由,从而获得关于情况的丰富背景知识,并附有总结关键点的综合信息。由于许多健康科学教育工作者都在引入创新方法,因此许多人都在考虑构建 LbC 学习模块。精心设计、设计和实施 LbC 工具仍然是一个挑战。本 AMEE 指南介绍了设计 LbC 工具时要考虑的步骤和要素,借鉴了来自不同健康专业领域的示例:医学、护理、物理治疗和牙科。具体来说,将讨论以下要素:(1)LbC 理论基础;(2)LbC 提问原则;(3)基于一致性的活动目标;(4)推理任务的性质;(5)内容/复杂性水平;(6)参考小组;(7)反馈/综合消息;(8)在线学习平台。

相似文献

1
Learning by concordance (LbC) to develop professional reasoning skills: AMEE Guide No. 141.通过一致性学习(LbC)来发展专业推理技能:AMEE 指南第 141 号。
Med Teach. 2021 Jun;43(6):614-621. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1900554. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Using learning-by-concordance to develop reasoning in epistaxis management with online feedback: A pilot study.采用一致性学习并结合在线反馈来提高鼻衄管理中的推理能力:一项初步研究。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241274583. doi: 10.1177/00368504241274583.
3
What can Designing Learning-by-Concordance Clinical Reasoning Cases Teach Us about Instruction in the Health Sciences?设计基于一致性的临床推理案例能教给健康科学教学什么?
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 May 18;12(1):160-168. doi: 10.5334/pme.898. eCollection 2023.
4
Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE guide no. 75.脚本一致性测试:从理论到实践:AMEE 指南第 75 号。
Med Teach. 2013;35(3):184-93. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.760036. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
Learning-by-Concordance (LbC): introducing undergraduate students to the complexity and uncertainty of clinical practice.通过一致性学习(LbC):向本科生介绍临床实践的复杂性和不确定性。
Can Med Educ J. 2016 Oct 18;7(2):e104-e113. eCollection 2016 Oct.
7
Questioning Aid for Rich, Real-Time Discussion (QARRD): A Tool to Improve Critical Thinking in Clinical Settings.质疑辅助工具在丰富、实时讨论中的应用(QARRD):一种提高临床环境下批判性思维的工具。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Apr 1;17:11132. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11132.
8
Educators and practitioners' perspectives in the development of a learning by concordance tool for medical clerkship in the context of the COVID pandemic.教育工作者和从业者对在新冠疫情背景下为医学见习开发一致性学习工具的看法。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Dec 29;12(6):43-54. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72461. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Learning strategies used by undergraduate nursing students in the context of a digitial educational strategy based on script concordance: A descriptive study.基于脚本一致性的数字教育策略背景下本科护理学生使用的学习策略:一项描述性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Dec;95:104607. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104607. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
The Assessment of Reasoning Tool (ART): structuring the conversation between teachers and learners.推理评估工具(ART):构建教师与学习者之间的对话
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Nov 27;5(4):197-203. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0052.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning-by-Concordance Approach in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.卫生专业教育中的“基于一致性的学习”方法:一项范围综述
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jul 4;14(1):387-398. doi: 10.5334/pme.1658. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning by Concordance as a Tool for Paediatric Dental Traumatology Education.以语料库学习作为儿童牙外伤学教育的一种工具
Eur J Dent Educ. 2025 May;29(2):392-400. doi: 10.1111/eje.13079. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Preliminary Validation of a Clinical Reasoning Theory-Based Assessment Rubric: An e-Delphi Study.
基于临床推理理论的评估量表的初步验证:一项电子德尔菲研究。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2025;46(3):173-175. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001320. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
4
Using learning-by-concordance to develop reasoning in epistaxis management with online feedback: A pilot study.采用一致性学习并结合在线反馈来提高鼻衄管理中的推理能力:一项初步研究。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241274583. doi: 10.1177/00368504241274583.
5
Evaluating clinical reasoning in first year DPT students using a script concordance test.运用脚本一致性测验评价第一年物理治疗专业学生的临床推理能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05281-w.
6
Impact of an online learning by concordance program on reflection.基于一致性的在线学习对反思的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 1;23(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04799-9.
7
What can Designing Learning-by-Concordance Clinical Reasoning Cases Teach Us about Instruction in the Health Sciences?设计基于一致性的临床推理案例能教给健康科学教学什么?
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 May 18;12(1):160-168. doi: 10.5334/pme.898. eCollection 2023.
8
Educators and practitioners' perspectives in the development of a learning by concordance tool for medical clerkship in the context of the COVID pandemic.教育工作者和从业者对在新冠疫情背景下为医学见习开发一致性学习工具的看法。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Dec 29;12(6):43-54. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72461. eCollection 2021 Dec.