Muñoz E, Regan D M, Margolis I B, Wise L
Ann Surg. 1985 Jul;202(1):119-25. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00019.
Surgical care is entering a new payment era for inhospital care using the diagnostic related group (DRG) mechanism for Medicare. A study at The Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center showed that a majority of its surgical DRGs would be unprofitable under the proposed reimbursement scheme. This study was undertaken to develop a method of allowing the hospital to group patients with each DRG that would show a difference in hospital charges and be clinically meaningful to surgeons. The study implementors tested the hypothesis that entities called identifiers, arbitrarily chosen as mode of admission [emergency (+ER vs. nonemergency (-ER)] and presence (+T) or absence (-T) of blood transfusion, would show a difference in charges (mean hospital charge exclusive of physician fees) within a DRG. Nine hundred five patients in nine DRGs encompassing general surgery, thoracic surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedics, urology, and head and neck surgery were studied. For ER identifier, eight of nine DRGs were found to be positive (greater than 20% difference in charges between positive and negative identifier); for T identifier, all DRGs (9) were positive. These findings demonstrate that these identifiers may enable teaching institutions to disaggregate each DRG and, in this way, propose more equitable reimbursement rates.
外科护理正进入一个新的住院护理付费时代,医疗保险采用诊断相关分组(DRG)机制。长岛犹太山边医疗中心的一项研究表明,根据拟议的报销方案,其大部分外科DRG将无利可图。开展这项研究是为了开发一种方法,使医院能够将患有每种DRG的患者进行分组,这些分组在医院收费方面会有所不同,并且对外科医生具有临床意义。研究实施者检验了这样一个假设:被称为标识符的实体,任意选择为入院方式[急诊(+ER与非急诊(-ER)]以及输血的存在(+T)或不存在(-T),在一个DRG内会在收费(不包括医生费用的平均医院收费)上显示出差异。对涵盖普通外科、胸外科、心脏外科、神经外科、骨科、泌尿外科以及头颈外科的9个DRG中的905名患者进行了研究。对于ER标识符,9个DRG中有8个呈阳性(阳性和阴性标识符之间的收费差异大于20%);对于T标识符,所有DRG(9个)均呈阳性。这些发现表明,这些标识符可能使教学机构能够对每个DRG进行细分,并以此提出更公平的报销率。