Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences (NIAES), National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO).
Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University.
Microbes Environ. 2024;39(3). doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME24006.
Although microbial inoculation may be effective for sustainable crop production, detrimental aspects have been argued because of the potential of inoculated microorganisms to behave as invaders and negatively affect the microbial ecosystem. We herein compared the impact of rhizobial inoculation on the soil bacterial community with that of agricultural land-use changes using a 16S rRNA amplicon ana-lysis. Soybean plants were cultivated with and without five types of bradyrhizobial inoculants (Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens or Bradyrhizobium ottawaense) in experimental fields of Andosol, and the high nodule occupancy (35-72%) of bradyrhizobial inoculants was confirmed by nosZ PCR. However, bradyrhizobial inoculants did not significantly affect Shannon's diversity index (α-diversity) or shifts (β-diversity) in the bacterial community in the soils. Moreover, the soil bacterial community was significantly affected by land-use types (conventional cropping, organic cropping, and original forest), where β-diversity correlated with soil chemical properties (pH, carbon, and nitrogen contents). Therefore, the effects of bradyrhizobial inoculation on bacterial communities in bulk soil were minor, regardless of high nodule occupancy. We also observed a correlation between the relative abundance of bacterial classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Gemmatimonadetes) and land-use types or soil chemical properties. The impact of microbial inoculation on soil microbial ecosystems has been exami-ned to a limited extent, such as rhizosphere communities and viability. In the present study, we found that bacterial community shifts in soil were more strongly affected by land usage than by rhizobial inoculation. Therefore, the results obtained herein highlight the importance of assessing microbial inoculants in consideration of the entire land management system.
虽然微生物接种可能对可持续作物生产有效,但由于接种微生物可能表现为入侵者并对微生物生态系统产生负面影响,因此有人认为存在不利方面。在此,我们通过 16S rRNA 扩增子分析比较了根瘤菌接种对土壤细菌群落的影响与农业土地利用变化的影响。在 Andosol 的实验田中,种植了大豆植物,并在没有(不接种根瘤菌)和有(接种根瘤菌)五种类型的慢生根瘤菌(Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens 或 Bradyrhizobium ottawaense)的情况下进行了种植,通过 nosZ PCR 确认了根瘤菌接种的高结瘤占有率(35-72%)。然而,根瘤菌接种对土壤中细菌群落的 Shannon 多样性指数(α多样性)或变化(β多样性)没有显著影响。此外,土壤细菌群落受土地利用类型(常规耕作、有机耕作和原始森林)显著影响,其中β多样性与土壤化学性质(pH、碳和氮含量)相关。因此,无论结瘤占有率高与否,根瘤菌接种对土壤中细菌群落的影响都较小。我们还观察到细菌类群(α变形菌门、γ变形菌门和芽单胞菌门)的相对丰度与土地利用类型或土壤化学性质之间存在相关性。微生物接种对土壤微生物生态系统的影响已在一定程度上进行了研究,例如根际群落和生存能力。在本研究中,我们发现土壤细菌群落的变化受土地利用的影响大于根瘤菌接种的影响。因此,本研究结果强调了在考虑整个土地管理系统的情况下评估微生物接种剂的重要性。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024-7-18
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018-5-20
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021-4-13
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024-4-10
Microorganisms. 2022-1-12
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021-3-10
Trends Microbiol. 2021-4