Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Nov;44(11):2473-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05713-2. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
To investigate current practices, changes, and perceptions of rheumatologists regarding GC use in RA patients.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire between April and August 2023. Rheumatologists from 31 province-level regions of Mainland China were invited to participate. Chi-squared tests were adopted to investigate the differences by sociodemographic characteristics.
1,717 rheumatologists from 598 hospitals completed the survey with a response rate of 92%. Up to 60% of participants expressed currently infrequent initiation of GC co-therapy with csDMARDs (hardly ever 7.0%; occasionally 24.6%; sometimes 29.1%), accompanied by a decline of frequency over time reported in 64.2%. Regarding attitudes towards bridging therapy with GC, 604 (35.2%) participants supported this approach, 468 (27.3%) opposed it, and 645 (37.6%) remained inconclusive. Time to GC discontinuation in context of csDMARDs was commonly reported within 6 months in current practice which has been narrowed over time. Reasons for chronic GC use were mostly reported due to suboptimal disease control, followed by the need of RA complications, and pre-existing comorbidities. After failure of GC cessation, majority of respondents (84.4%) would escalate RA therapy (commonly by addition of JAK inhibitors, TNF inhibitors), which usually or often facilitated the GC cessation. The most frequently reported advantages and weaknesses of GC were rapid and strong efficacy, adverse events, respectively. Regarding long-term low-dose GC use for RA, the percentage of respondents who supported, opposed, or depended on the situation were 15.9%, 17.2%, and 66.9%, respectively.
The current data demonstrate that GC initiation for RA treatment is not as frequent as before and the awareness of GC discontinuation is growing in current practice. Attitudes towards GC co-therapy with csDMARDs vary considerably and long-term low-dose GC use remain situation dependent.
本研究旨在调查风湿科医生在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中使用糖皮质激素(GC)的当前实践、变化和认知。
本研究采用横断面调查方法,于 2023 年 4 月至 8 月期间使用结构化问卷对中国大陆 31 个省级地区的风湿科医生进行调查。采用卡方检验比较不同人口统计学特征医生间的差异。
共有 598 家医院的 1717 名风湿科医生完成了调查,应答率为 92%。高达 60%的参与者表示目前很少启动 GC 与 csDMARDs 的联合治疗(几乎不启动 7.0%;偶尔启动 24.6%;有时启动 29.1%),且报告的频率随时间呈下降趋势(64.2%)。在 GC 桥接治疗方面,604 名(35.2%)参与者支持该方法,468 名(27.3%)反对,645 名(37.6%)未明确表示。在当前实践中,GC 停药时间通常在 6 个月内,但随着时间的推移,该时间已缩短。慢性 GC 使用的原因主要是疾病控制不理想,其次是需要治疗 RA 并发症和合并症。在 GC 停药失败后,大多数受访者(84.4%)会升级 RA 治疗(通常是添加 JAK 抑制剂、TNF 抑制剂),这通常或经常有助于 GC 停药。GC 最常被报告的优点和缺点分别是起效迅速且疗效强、不良反应。对于 RA 的长期低剂量 GC 使用,支持、反对或视情况而定的受访者比例分别为 15.9%、17.2%和 66.9%。
目前的数据表明,RA 治疗中 GC 的起始使用频率不如以前高,且当前实践中 GC 停药意识正在增强。对于 GC 与 csDMARDs 的联合治疗,医生的态度差异较大,长期低剂量 GC 使用仍取决于具体情况。