Garrow Donald, Miller Scott, Sinha Debajyoti, Conway Jason, Hoffman Brenda J, Hawes Robert H, Romagnuolo Joseph
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.027.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) achieves high-resolution images of the bile duct and pancreas, while avoiding the risks of ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography). It appears comparable to MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography), although its use is less widely disseminated. We aimed to summarize EUS test performance in suspected biliary disease with meta-analysis.
MEDLINE search (January 1987-September 2006), selected reference lists, external experts, and manual search of abstracts were used. Studies permitting (re)construction of 2 x 2 tables for EUS versus a gold standard were used. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity after adjusting for a number of potential confounders. Summary receiver operating characteristic analysis, with the sensitivity corresponding to the point on the receiver operating characteristic curve where sensitivity equals specificity (Q*) and area under the curve, was performed. The effects of sample size, quality, disease prevalence and spectrum, pancreatitis, echoendoscope type, and EUS era on diagnostic performance were assessed. Performance regarding presence of obstruction, choledocholithiasis, and malignancy was analyzed.
Thirty-six eligible, non-overlapping studies met inclusion criteria (3532 subjects). EUS had a high overall pooled sensitivity (88%; 95% confidence interval, 85%-91%) and specificity (90%; 87%-93%) for biliary obstruction (area under the curve = 0.97; Q* = 0.92). EUS had higher sensitivity (89%; 87%-91%) and specificity (94%; 91%-96%) for choledocholithiasis than for malignancy (sensitivity, 78%; 69%-85%; specificity, 84%; 78%-91%). Smaller studies and ones mainly studying patients with suspected strictures were associated with lower test performance.
There is excellent overall accuracy for EUS in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, with less impressive results for malignancy (when fine-needle aspiration is not used).
内镜超声(EUS)可获得胆管和胰腺的高分辨率图像,同时避免了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的风险。尽管其应用不如磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)广泛,但似乎与之相当。我们旨在通过荟萃分析总结EUS在疑似胆道疾病中的检测性能。
使用MEDLINE检索(1987年1月至2006年9月)、选定的参考文献列表、外部专家以及对摘要的手工检索。使用允许构建EUS与金标准对比的2×2表格的研究。在调整了一些潜在混杂因素后,使用随机效应模型估计合并敏感性和特异性。进行汇总受试者工作特征分析,敏感性对应于受试者工作特征曲线上敏感性等于特异性的点(Q*)以及曲线下面积。评估样本量、质量、疾病患病率和谱、胰腺炎、超声内镜类型以及EUS时代对诊断性能的影响。分析了关于梗阻、胆总管结石和恶性肿瘤存在情况的性能。
36项符合纳入标准的非重叠研究(3532名受试者)。EUS对胆道梗阻具有较高的总体合并敏感性(88%;95%置信区间,85% - 91%)和特异性(90%;87% - 93%)(曲线下面积 = 0.97;Q* = 0.92)。EUS对胆总管结石的敏感性(89%;87% - 91%)和特异性(94%;91% - 96%)高于对恶性肿瘤的敏感性(78%;69% - 85%)和特异性(84%;78% - 91%)。规模较小的研究以及主要研究疑似狭窄患者的研究与较低的检测性能相关。
EUS在诊断胆总管结石方面总体准确性极佳,而在诊断恶性肿瘤方面(不使用细针穿刺时)结果则不那么令人印象深刻。