• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与患者安全的动机:多视角、探索性调查。

Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.

机构信息

Institute for Patient Safety (IfPS), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x
PMID:39261814
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11391733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite increasing calls for more patient engagement in patient safety, limited knowledge remains on what actually motivates key stakeholders in healthcare to promote patient engagement. We therefore set out to survey key stakeholders of patient engagement in patient safety (i.e., patients, healthcare professionals, and managers). We aimed to identify and explore stakeholder's distinct and shared motives for patient engagement.

METHODS

A stepwise Delphi method was applied, utilizing semi-structured online interviews for determination of stakeholder motives for patient engagement in patient safety. In a subsequent online survey, statements were evaluated and identified. 34 subject-matter experts from all relevant stakeholder groups completed the online interviews and 33 the online survey. We used content analysis approaches for qualitative and descriptive analyses for quantitative measures. Further, we evaluated the consensus on distinct and shared motives across stakeholder groups.

RESULTS

Seven key motives for patient engagement in patient safety were identified. Major motives attributed to patients were: (1) To improve experiences and care outcomes for oneself, as well as (2) for future patients, (3) to express gratitude and appreciation, (4) to cope successfully with treatment-related emotions. A motive shared by patients and professionals was (5) to contribute actively to improved delivery of healthcare. To optimize patient safety, costs, and care processes (6) was shared by professionals and managers. Lastly, (7) to improve patient-provider relationships was jointly shared by all stakeholder groups. For four motives (1, 2, 6, 7) consensus was established.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to unlock the full potential of future interventions in patient engagement, a deeper understanding of stakeholder motives is essential. We identified a set of distinct and shared motives for patient engagement across relevant stakeholder groups. Our findings may inform future interventions in patient engagement that take account of the motivational foundations and aspirations of all stakeholders who are key for the success for collaborative patient safety and care improvements.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ID DRKS00031837 (Date May 8, 2023).

摘要

背景和目的

尽管越来越多的人呼吁让患者更多地参与患者安全,但对于医疗保健中的关键利益相关者推动患者参与的动机,我们的了解仍然有限。因此,我们着手调查患者安全中的患者参与的关键利益相关者(即患者、医疗保健专业人员和管理人员)。我们旨在确定和探讨利益相关者推动患者参与的不同和共同动机。

方法

采用逐步德尔菲法,利用半结构化在线访谈确定利益相关者推动患者参与患者安全的动机。在随后的在线调查中,对陈述进行评估和确定。来自所有相关利益相关者群体的 34 名主题专家完成了在线访谈,33 名完成了在线调查。我们使用内容分析方法进行定性和描述性分析,以及对定量措施进行分析。此外,我们评估了不同利益相关者群体对不同和共同动机的共识。

结果

确定了推动患者安全参与的七个关键动机。患者归因的主要动机是:(1)改善自身的体验和护理结果,以及(2)为未来患者,(3)表达感激和赞赏,(4)成功应对与治疗相关的情绪。患者和专业人员共同的动机是(5)积极为改善医疗保健服务做出贡献。为了优化患者安全、成本和护理流程(6)是专业人员和管理人员共同的动机。最后,(7)改善医患关系是所有利益相关者群体共同的动机。对于四个动机(1、2、6、7),达成了共识。

结论

为了充分发挥未来患者参与干预的潜力,必须深入了解利益相关者的动机。我们确定了一组不同和共同的患者参与动机,涉及相关利益相关者群体。我们的研究结果可以为未来的患者参与干预提供信息,这些干预措施考虑了所有利益相关者的动机基础和愿望,这对于成功改善合作患者安全和护理至关重要。

试验注册

DRKS00031837(日期为 2023 年 5 月 8 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0040/11391733/71a0799406fd/12913_2024_11495_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0040/11391733/71a0799406fd/12913_2024_11495_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0040/11391733/71a0799406fd/12913_2024_11495_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.患者参与患者安全的动机:多视角、探索性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x.
2
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
PARENTS 2 study: consensus report for parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review process.PARENTS 2 研究:围产期死亡评审过程中父母参与的共识报告。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):215-224. doi: 10.1002/uog.20139.
4
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
5
Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development.在核心结局和信息集开发过程中,针对德尔菲调查中仅同行或多利益相关者群体反馈进行的三项嵌套随机对照试验。
Trials. 2016 Aug 17;17(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1479-x.
6
Setting a research agenda for vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome using a patient and stakeholder engagement model.制定血管型埃勒斯-当洛斯综合征研究议程,采用患者和利益相关者参与模式。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1436-1444.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.043. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Selecting Core Outcomes for Randomised Effectiveness trials In Type 2 diabetes (SCORE-IT): a patient and healthcare professional consensus on a core outcome set for type 2 diabetes.选择 2 型糖尿病随机有效性试验的核心结局指标(SCORE-IT):2 型糖尿病核心结局集的患者和医疗保健专业人员共识。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 29;7(1):e000700. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000700. eCollection 2019.
8
Mapping Stakeholder Perspectives on Engagement in Concussion Research to Theory.将利益相关者对脑震荡研究参与的观点映射到理论中。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2020 Mar;47(2):202-209. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2019.324.
9
How Stakeholder Assessment of E-Prescribing Can Help Determine Incentives to Facilitate Management of Care: A Delphi Study.利益相关者对电子处方评估如何有助于确定激励措施以促进医疗保健管理:一项德尔菲研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Nov;23(11):1130-1139. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.11.1130.
10
Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.利益相关者参与共同制定与政策相关的知识,以促进发展性残疾人士的就业。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00548-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Patient Safety Through Patient Engagement at the Organisational Level: A Delphi-Based Needs Assessment Among Patient and Family Advisory Councils.通过组织层面的患者参与促进患者安全:患者及家属咨询委员会基于德尔菲法的需求评估
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70319. doi: 10.1111/hex.70319.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of meaningful patient participation at the collective level in healthcare organizations: A systematic review.医疗机构中集体层面有意义的患者参与的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Health Policy. 2023 Dec;138:104946. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104946. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
The future of engaging patients and families for patient safety.让患者及家属参与保障患者安全的未来发展。
Lancet. 2024 Mar 2;403(10429):791-793. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01908-6. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
Engaging patients in patient safety: a qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers' perspectives.
让患者参与患者安全:一项关于医疗管理者和提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 29;21(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01152-1.
4
[National health target on patient safety].[国家患者安全卫生目标]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Jan;66(1):92-97. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03636-6. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey.如何优化患者/家属参与医院规划和改进的共识:德尔菲调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e061271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271.
6
Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review.德尔菲技术在健康科学中的报告指南:方法学综述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
The role of health care organizations in patient engagement: Mechanisms to support a strong relationship between patients and clinicians.医疗机构在患者参与中的作用:支持患者与临床医生之间建立牢固关系的机制。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2023;48(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000346. Epub 2022 May 23.
8
Organizational capacity for patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: interviews with patient/family advisors, managers and clinicians.医疗机构中患者和家属参与规划和改进的组织能力:患者/家属顾问、管理人员和临床医生的访谈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 13;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab147.
9
Barriers and facilitators to patient engagement in patient safety from patients and healthcare professionals' perspectives: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.从患者和医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,患者参与患者安全的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和元综合。
Nurs Forum. 2021 Oct;56(4):938-949. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12635. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.探索患者和公众参与健康、社会关怀和患者安全的理论、障碍和促进因素:系统综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3.